Exactly: the key word in my posting was "hook".
Obviously an online version of LiveCode would have to be a cut-down version;
but it should be sufficient to generate interest in the whole shebang.
I have had conversations with many people who "cannot be a*sed" to download
LiveCode and install it
Tom Glod wrote:
I think the premise was for new users to discover it in that. I may look
into it when there is more time .. i wouldn't have much use for it
myself though.
Exactly.
I've found it useful to go through the Bugzilla request queue a couple
times a year and see what folks are
I think the premise was for new users to discover it in that. I may look
into it when there is more time .. i wouldn't have much use for it
myself though.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> With LC's main benefits being
With LC's main benefits being rapid deployment of GUI apps, this sort of
CLI can be useful for some things but not a key value driver for the
company.
But I agree it wouldn't be hard to do. For those who want it, why not
just make it?
- rg
Tom Glod wrote:
i can't see it being too hard to
i can't see it being too hard to make a sandbox on the server
its a good idea. thanks richmond. should we file this as feature request?
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I was "over here" just now:
>
> https://www
I was "over here" just now:
https://www.techsupportalert.com/content/dozens-free-online-programming-environments.htm
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/codingground.htm
and thought that a version of LiveCode (7.1.4 perhaps) available as an
online
thing might be a good 'hook'.
Richmond.
__
