On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/03/2017 02:58 PM, Dr. Hawkins via use-livecode wrote:
>
> tsk, tsk.
>>
>> Alcohol and math don't mix: don't drink and derive!
>>
>
> They do, but then you end up with fuzzy logic.
>
> Or t
On 08/03/2017 02:58 PM, Dr. Hawkins via use-livecode wrote:
tsk, tsk.
Alcohol and math don't mix: don't drink and derive!
They do, but then you end up with fuzzy logic.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livec
Erdős is considered one of the most prolific mathematicians of the 20th century.
His most famous quote is 'a mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into
theorems'.
He drank a lot of coffee.
He also took a lot of amphetamines.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Aug 2017
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:38 PM, hh via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > Monte wrote:
> > ... G&T drinking holiday ;-)
>
tsk, tsk.
Alcohol and math don't mix: don't drink and derive!
[*duck*]
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
_
Now we know how new math came to be.
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 13:53 , Monte Goulding via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4 Aug 2017, at 6:38 am, hh via use-livecode
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Monte wrote:
>>> ... G&T drinking holiday ;-)
>>
>> Practising Geometry & Trigonometry and drinking??
>
> Ye
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 6:38 am, hh via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>> Monte wrote:
>> ... G&T drinking holiday ;-)
>
> Practising Geometry & Trigonometry and drinking??
Yeah I know… crazy mathematicians! What can you do.
Cheers
Monte
___
use-livecode mai
> Monte wrote:
> ... G&T drinking holiday ;-)
Practising Geometry & Trigonometry and drinking??
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http:/
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 6:16 am, Monte Goulding via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> They probably should be deprecated.
I have started some internal discussion about this. There’s mouseStillDown as
well. I think they shouldn’t be in the handler list as they may not be
deprecated but are certainly not
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> A better mouseWithin would be something like this:
>
> local sMouseWithin = false
>
> on mouseEnter
>put true into sMouseWithin
> end mouseEnter
>
that would take some serious work on m
> On 3 Aug 2017, at 10:54 pm, dunbarx via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Note: If there is no mouseWithin handler in the target object's script, no
> mouseWithin message is sent, even if there is a mouseWithin handler in an
> object that's further along the message path.
>
> Why this should be so i
track
down issues like you did.
Craig
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/MouseDown-sent-to-button-in-group-but-MouseUp-sent-to-card-tp4717935p4717959.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at
to track
down issues like you did.
Craig
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/MouseDown-sent-to-button-in-group-but-MouseUp-sent-to-card-tp4717935p4717959.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 AM, dunbarx via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Note: If there is no mouseWithin handler in the target object's script, no
> mouseWithin message is sent, even if there is a mouseWithin handler in an
> object that's further along the message path
to remove that manually...
> Craig Newman
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.
> 278305.n4.nabble.com/MouseDown-sent-to-button-in-
> group-but-MouseUp-sent-to-card-tp4717935p4717949.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list
f the button. Such a construct is included
as a head start for the most common handler in button scripts.
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/MouseDown-sent-to-button-in-group-but-MouseUp-sent-to-card-tp4717935p4717949.html
Sent from t
along the message path.
Why this should be so is a mystery, but maybe someone from the team will
chime in.
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/MouseDown-sent-to-button-in-group-but-MouseUp-sent-to-card-tp4717935p4717947.html
Sent fro
I feel a bit dumb. yes, there was an empty mouseup handler in the buttons.
So that is fixed.
Now for mousewithin...
Having mousewithin in the stack script does not work unless I put:
on mousewithin
pass mousewithin
end mousewithin
in the button.
What is the explanation for that?
On 3 August
I’d start by double-checking that there is a mouseUp handler in the button. If
there isn’t, then the mouseUp will move to the group… if no mouseUp in the
group it will move to the card.
be well,
randy
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Kaveh Bazargan via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I have buttons i
I have buttons in a group. When I click any button, the mousedown message
is received by the button correctly but mouseup is received by card. Also I
believe mousewithin.
How can I get the button to be the target for all?
My script is in the stack
Thanks.
--
Kaveh Bazargan
Director
River Val
19 matches
Mail list logo
