...but that would might be a kernel problem...
Best,
Keith..
On 14 Feb 2012, at 20:35, Marty Knapp wrote:
> And when they don't work, it's the pits . . .
>
> Marty K
>> On 2/14/12 1:16 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>>> I just tried it and it works a peach!
>>
>> I always wondered how peaches work. Fuz
And when they don't work, it's the pits . . .
Marty K
On 2/14/12 1:16 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I just tried it and it works a peach!
I always wondered how peaches work. Fuzzy logic probably.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.
On 2/14/12 1:16 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I just tried it and it works a peach!
I always wondered how peaches work. Fuzzy logic probably.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
Oic. That is awesome thanks! I just tried it and it works a peach! I had the
mindset that the function form of a command is identical to the command form,
and so never looked any further into the documentation.
Bob
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:27 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 2/14/12 11:47 AM, Bob
On 2/14/12 11:47 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
If however, I reference a function that is in the
script of the current card, then it fails with a cannot find handler
error.
You need to use this syntax:
get value("myFunction()",card 1)
See "value" in the dictionary.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay
Hi all.
I came across an oddity with the message path and using get the value of. I am
not sure if I can be concise in my description but I will do my best. I have a
validation system which puts properties in the fields I am validating, that
contain the information necessary to perform the val
