Richard: I have cc’d this to Max.
Max: Your Wiki site looks really great and could become a very valuable
community documentation resource. What we’re thinking, in this thread, is that
as a long term investment it would be more optimum to host the wiki on a site
that has no (or much less) adver
William Prothero wrote:
> Richard:
> Tnx for the info on the ad blockers.
>
> Thinking for the long run, though, getting a wiki on a site without
> so many ads, in a version of Wiki that can be exported easily to
> another site, seems a good idea.
Agreed. Feel free to discuss it with the Max, t
Richard:
Tnx for the info on the ad blockers.
Thinking for the long run, though, getting a wiki on a site without so many
ads, in a version of Wiki that can be exported easily to another site, seems a
good idea.
Best,
Bill
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Richard Gaskin
> wrote:
>
> William
Firefox and Adblock Plus, no ads.
2015-10-14 9:06 GMT+03:00 Richard Gaskin :
> William Prothero wrote:
>
> > I use Safari because it synchronizes all my bookmarks between my
> > devices. I know there is a Firefox plugin that does that. I used
> > it, but there was an issue I can't remember when I
William Prothero wrote:
> I use Safari because it synchronizes all my bookmarks between my
> devices. I know there is a Firefox plugin that does that. I used
> it, but there was an issue I can't remember when I upgraded to
> Yosemite, so I switched. Firefox is a very good option, tho.
There's a
Richard,
That sounds like a great offer! I think it would be a much more friendly site
if we didn't have to download all the ads.
I use Safari because it synchronizes all my bookmarks between my devices. I
know there is a Firefox plugin that does that. I used it, but there was an
issue I can'
Kay C Lan wrote:
> What advertising?
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/vqfr5p2acpomkeh/lcwiki.png?dl=0
>
> Firefox + the NoScript addon
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/
>
> Wouldn't visit any website without it :-)
Amen. NoScript is great not only for web sites whose owne
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:31 AM, William Prothero
wrote:
> Only downside is all the massive advertising.
What advertising?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vqfr5p2acpomkeh/lcwiki.png?dl=0
Firefox + the NoScript addon
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/
Wouldn't visit any websi
On 10/13/2015 12:29 PM, Heather Laine wrote:
The lessons site is not the be-all and end-all. A users wiki might be a good thing to
add to it. However, I am also in favour of improving what we have, rather than
attempting to replace it wholesale because its not perfect. A great way to ensure
th
Only downside is all the massive advertising. I guess, for free, we can put up
with it. “Beggards can’t be choosers”.
One thing, thinking ahead, is how hard it will be to export and transfer the
content to a different wiki site when we want to.
Bill
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Richard Gaski
Richard:
Just what I was thinking! Great resource.
Bill
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Richard Gaskin
> wrote:
>
> William Prothero wrote:
> > I’m wondering if a possible approach might be if one of the users set
> > up a wiki as a trial, then if it became popular and useful, it could
> > be in
William Prothero wrote:
> I’m wondering if a possible approach might be if one of the users set
> up a wiki as a trial, then if it became popular and useful, it could
> be incorporated into the lessons and livecode site? A wiki is a
> pretty different beast from the lessons site. It’s pretty easy
hurdle and I
>>>>> haven’t accomplished that yet, as I’ve been tryin got use AppWrapper 3
>>>>> and it won’t work. Some kind of cookbook, that could be updated as Apple
>>>>> adds new hurdles and requirements, would be marvelous.
>>>>>
headings I
>>>> use currently are shown below. There are sub-headings with specific code
>>>> and for different applications. It is just a collection, saved from the
>>>> email list over the last two years for my own use and not refined for mass
>>>
istribution.
>>>
>>> Array handling
>>> Behaviors
>>> Calling handlers, out of path hierarchy
>>> CEF Browser
>>> Code signing
>>> Color-mouse-at loc
>>> Date
>>> DataGrid
>>> Debugger use and tricks
>>&
Hi,
William Prothero, Your list would make a great addition to the existing
wiki pages.
Mike asked about asking LiveCode to host a wiki. I think it would be better
to host the wiki on Wikia.com and not suck up bandwidth and energy from the
folks at LiveCode.
The wikia system is robust and comes
Michael Doub wrote:
Would it be reasonable to ask Livecode to host a wiki site for
documentation and examples? I kind of like the idea of having the
ability to add information or update when I see something that it out of
date or unclear.
The problem is always organization and searching. This
> CEF Browser
>> Code signing
>> Color-mouse-at loc
>> Date
>> DataGrid
>> Debugger use and tricks
>> Detect if app is running and user is "on" it.
>> DNS mysteries
>> Drag and Drop
>> Email thru livecode server
>> Encry
ion in iOS
Graphic effects
Groups
Images
iOS mobile stuff
Learning materials links
Memory monitoring
MobGui
Mobile Copying stacks and using them as libraries
Number precision
PHP and databases
Playing sound in SA and Mobile
Playing sounds
Printing
Product version from script
Scientific notation conver
play
Files and directories
Find out if some program is running
Get Mac camera image
Get Version in iOS
Graphic effects
Groups
Images
iOS mobile stuff
Learning materials links
Memory monitoring
MobGui
Mobile Copying stacks and using them as libraries
Number precision
PHP and databases
Playing sound
William Prothero wrote:
I said we need a dictionary focussed on tasks, not on commands,
but obviously we need both. I know Richard has been leading a
group taking this on. Richard, is this happening?
The focus of an API reference like the LiveCode Dictionary will always
have the language toke
Steven,
Thank you. That seems quite fair.
Regards,
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
> On Oct 10, 2015, at 4:23 AM, "Steven Crighton"
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your messages on the new learning course.
>
> We are constantly working on improving our lear
Thanks for your messages on the new learning course.
We are constantly working on improving our learning materials. Create it V1
was a good start but as you pointed out it did come with some issues.
With this version we have decided to focus our efforts by creating a course
with less apps but
I honestly am not sure what LC are thinking or where they get their marketing
advice but I am failing to see a positive in this unless you are completely new
to the platform.
Why?
Simply because if what has happened with the create-it course is indicative of
how LC does things one has to be con
ice of a new series of learning materials from the
> mothership, for $75. These materials are derived from the Create-IT course
> for which I paid about $300. Since I got a year of Indy license, I figured it
> really cost me $30.
>
> Anyway, the CreateIt course was pretty bugg
Folks:
I just got the notice of a new series of learning materials from the
mothership, for $75. These materials are derived from the Create-IT course for
which I paid about $300. Since I got a year of Indy license, I figured it
really cost me $30.
Anyway, the CreateIt course was pretty buggy
26 matches
Mail list logo
