Dan Brown wrote:
> The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time
> business in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership
> with one of the top existing aggregators and creating a widget to
> display the ads I could see being a winner.
>
> For apps made in lc communit
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Dan Brown via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business
> in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top
> existing aggregators and creating a widge
That would work for me.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 22, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Dan Brown via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business
> in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top
> existing aggregators and
The logistics of operating an ad aggregator would be a full time business
in itself I'd imagine. However lc forming a partnership with one of the top
existing aggregators and creating a widget to display the ads I could see
being a winner.
For apps made in lc community they could take a percentage
When you sign up with an ad aggregator, a portion of the revenue goes to the
aggregator. This would be no different. Basically, I am suggesting something
like MobFox for LiveCode. Voluntary, of course.
We need a realistic and practical as solution for ads.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 21, 201
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to
> have ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more
> than the cost of hiring extra staff to m
I did not mean inside the IDE.
I was suggesting that perhaps providing a start to finish way for us to have
ads in the apps we make could provide extra income to RunRev - more than the
cost of hiring extra staff to make that happen.
I don't want to sound like I know what is best for them - I do
No he said apps MADE in Livecode. But I think it's a bad idea for RunRev
(livecode whatever) to get sidetracked. I really like the progress they are
making with new features and bug fixes. I want this long train to keep on
moving. After all, without love, where would you be right now? (hmmm... t
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I
> suggested LC take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds
> for apps made with LC. It could be a source of
Ouch.
On 7/21/17 11:58 pm, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode wrote:
My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC
take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with
LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for developer
My suggestion might be terrible, but I put it in for discussion. I suggested LC
take on the role of ad aggregator for providing in-app adds for apps made with
LC. It could be a source of revenue for the company and for developers, and it
could attract more developers looking for easy solutions t
11 matches
Mail list logo
