HTML5 failure / javascript console

2023-08-31 Thread Eller, Roger via use-livecode
My first try of saving a simple stack as HTML5... When it tries to run, it says to check the Javascropt console, which shows the following. As a LiveCode Script only developer, none of this gives me a clue. This is on Windows, using Chrome. Failed to load resource: the server responded with

html5 - javascriptHandlers

2022-03-18 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
With the Browser widget javascript can send messages to the parent app, triggering some Livecodescript in the parent. Is there an equivalent in a html5 deployment? It seems that in html5 deployment Livecodescript can call to the Javascript of the parent browser by "do somestuff() as Javas

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-18 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Hi Mark It turns out it is an anomaly due to CORS. There were so many steps involved in trying to isolate what was going on (juggling different deployments, different servers). Eventually I got there. https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23633 I wonder if there are a whole host of CORS

Re: debugging javascript in html5

2022-03-18 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2022-03-18 10:44, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode wrote: Considering the html5 enhancements might well be the biggest thing in LC 10, I can foresee a whole world of pain when it comes to us debugging Javascript interactions. Yes - this is somewhat painful at present - and we do hope to

Re: debugging javascript in html5

2022-03-18 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2022-03-18 11:19, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode wrote: Here's a peculiarity I haven't seen mentioned before. I am trying to test the viability of the idea of a function to call back to LC and provide debugging info. Assume you create a LC function lclog(pmsg,pval) and you put a breakpoin

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-18 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2022-03-17 13:07, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode wrote: So there is something else going on between LC's libUrlLastRHHeaders() and LC's interaction with the JS XMLHttpRequest(). This something is stripping out most of the headers. As I said, LC is not stripping anything - we are returnin

Re: debugging javascript in html5

2022-03-18 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Here's a peculiarity I haven't seen mentioned before. I am trying to test the viability of the idea of a function to call back to LC and provide debugging info. Assume you create a LC function lclog(pmsg,pval) and you put a breakpoint in the IDE inside that function body. Set the htmltext of a b

debugging javascript in html5

2022-03-18 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Considering the html5 enhancements might well be the biggest thing in LC 10, I can foresee a whole world of pain when it comes to us debugging Javascript interactions. Without access to all the development tools that come in modern browsers how is any interaction of any complexity between LC and

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-17 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Hi Mark Thank you for your response. However, I just tried in the Javascript console of Safari, Chrome and Firefox and the local test server to which I am POSTing is returning the headers (as LC does when running not as HTML5). Here's the JS I used. As you can see, it's a simple P

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-17 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2022-03-16 14:15, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode wrote: If one could get hold in Livecodescript of the Javascript Request object that was sent to the server, then one might be able to get hold of the Response headers. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XMLHttpRequest/getAllRes

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-16 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
If one could get hold in Livecodescript of the Javascript Request object that was sent to the server, then one might be able to get hold of the Response headers. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XMLHttpRequest/getAllResponseHeaders My guess is that the shim is getting hold of this

Re: 10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-16 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
trying to find the "HTML5 Deployment" guide, which supposedly lists the limitations. I can't find this HTML5 Deployment guide from a Google search nor within the IDE (where it supposedly lives) nor on livecode.com. Here's what the Release Notes say: For more information, p

10.0.0-dp-2 html5 and liburlLastRHHeaders()

2022-03-15 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
The only headers returned from a POST command are content-length content-type (in the IDE all the headers sent by the server are returned by this function). Seems a bit strange to me, as there may well be other important meta-information carried in headers (for example, Date:, at the very leas

AW: HTML5 Deployment

2021-11-09 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
ct "Deploying Your Application" and then "HTML5 Deployment settings". There you should find a bunch of information. Hope this helps. Matthias Am 10.11.2021 um 00:41 schrieb Paul Dupuis via use-livecode : I am trying to deploy and HTML app. Standalone building was

Re: HTML5 Deployment

2021-11-09 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
Paul, if you open the Livecode Dictionary, then you can see 2 tabs in the left upper corner. One is labeled "API" and one is labeled "Guide". Click on "Guide" and then select "Deploying Your Application" and then "HTML5 Deployment settings". T

HTML5 Deployment

2021-11-09 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
I am trying to deploy and HTML app. Standalone building was straightforward and I now have a folder of stuff. MyApp.html standalone.zip standalone-commercial-9.6.3.html.mem standalone-commercial-9.6.3.js The HTML5 panel in the Standalone Builder says to see the "HTML5 Deployment Guide i

Re: HiDPI scaling on HTML5 works great !

2021-07-08 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Thats great news, thanks! On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:09 AM Rolf Kocherhans via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hello All > > For all doing HTML5 stuff, try the new 9.6.3 RC-1 Release, > finally it can now do HiDPI scaling ! > > The stacks on web

HiDPI scaling on HTML5 works great !

2021-07-07 Thread Rolf Kocherhans via use-livecode
Hello All For all doing HTML5 stuff, try the new 9.6.3 RC-1 Release, finally it can now do HiDPI scaling ! The stacks on webpages now look beautiful ! Thanks to all who made this happen ! Cheers Rolf ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode

WebAssembly and HiDPI scaling for HTML5 when ?

2021-04-03 Thread Rolf Kocherhans via use-livecode
Hello LiveCode Engineers I am very patiently waiting for HiDPI scaling and WebAssembly to be incorporated into HTML5 in LiveCode. Looking at the Git pages it seems to be already ready for a very long time ? https://github.com/livecode/livecode/milestone/193 Do you have an estimate when you

Re: Anyone willing to share a basic webpage template for LC HTML5 apps?

2020-05-15 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
Just asked the same question. Would love to figure that out? Could we share a Github project? On 14 May 2020, 03:40 +0100, Terry Judd via use-livecode , wrote: > Hi - I've got a couple of HTML5 apps that I want to deploy to students at my > uni and was wondering if anyone had a f

Help with HTML5 Livecode Site

2020-05-15 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
I would like to create a beautiful HTML5 Livecode based community site. The best examples I’ve found are by hh here on the list. I’m really looking to build on those great resources and work with some artists to make something neat. Can anyone advise how to do lazy loading of the engine, and

Re: Anyone willing to share a basic webpage template for LC HTML5 apps?

2020-05-13 Thread Terry Judd via use-livecode
Hi - I've got a couple of HTML5 apps that I want to deploy to students at my uni and was wondering if anyone had a fairly basic starting webpage that I could use rather than the one that LC generates automatically. If possible I'm looking to lose the elements in the top sectio

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
I have to correct myself. The script works when i call an url that is on the same server as the html5 app is called from. And more important parameters can also be used. And as Sean already posted about a HTML5 library, it´s possible to use an HTML5 app with an api layer using LC Server or PHP

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Hi Colin I have a library I’ve created for HTML5 and php for LiveCode Deployment. Pm me at s...@pidigital.co.uk Sean Cole Pi Digital Productions Ltd eMail Ts & Cs > On 29 Apr 2020, at 20:00, matthias rebbe via use-livecode > wrote: > > If "post... to url" an

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
.google.com <https://www.google.com/>" into tMyUrl load URL tMyUrl with message "myUrlDownloadFinished" END MOUSEUP on myUrlDownloadFinished answer "Download Complete" &return &return &the cachedURLS with "Okay" set the text of fld 1 to url t

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread Devin Asay via use-livecode
That’s good to know, Matthias. So it seems that what you’d have to do is, still do the MySQL I/O in LC Server scripts, but also dynamically construct the HTML output in your LC server scripts, so that the calling HTML5 app could make sense of it. Am I interpreting the situation correctly

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
I was also thinking about using LC Server or PHP scripts, but if i understand it correctly then "put URL" or "POST.. to URL" aren't currently supported in the LC HTML5 engine. Only "load URL" is supported and only for http / https. Matthias - Matthias Rebb

Re: Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread Devin Asay via use-livecode
Colin, I haven’t tried it myself, but I would think you’d have to write an API layer using LiveCode Server scripting. All of the MySQL reads and writes would take place in your .lc scripts on LC Server. Then it would be simple, RESTful http calls from your HTML5 app. Of course, this all

Livecode HTML5 and SQL

2020-04-29 Thread Colin Kelly via use-livecode
Anyone got any insightful ways of READING/WRITING to a mySQL table using web-apps developed with Livecode HTML5? Thanks Col. -- Colin Kelly M 07951 920680 ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

Re: Save stack in HTML5

2020-03-29 Thread Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
Colin, Sorry I didn't even notice your message til just now. For persistent data, you're going to need some form of storage. Usually, websites utilise cookies. This is the more security-conscious way of handling it, depending on the data of course. w3school.com/js/js_cookies.asp has good examples

Save stack in HTML5

2020-03-27 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
I made progress getting the basic stack going, the main hold ups were ‘wait' and 'the system date', neither of those work. What approach is needed if the stack has text entry that you want to persist when the page is reloaded? Save this stack seems not to work. _

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-26 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2020-03-25 21:07, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: I will make a note to double-check the macOS AppStore rules in the next day or so (this is assuming you are thinking about macOS AppStore submission), but from memory they are very much aligned with the iOS AppStore ones in this regard

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
via use-livecode > wrote: > > My apologies for the misunderstanding. I thought we were all still talking > about HTML5 deployment with a small digression question regarding iOS. > Somehow I missed the part where it got steered off into every other platform > :) >

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
My apologies for the misunderstanding. I thought we were all still talking about HTML5 deployment with a small digression question regarding iOS. Somehow I missed the part where it got steered off into every other platform :) Sean Cole Pi Digital > On 25 Mar 2020, at 23:34, William Proth

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
What I was thinking of was distributing a fairly basic educational application, then adding features and lessons as life goes on. Sounds like it would depend on how extensive the features were. Perhaps lessons would only trigger a problem if they required the addition of significant new features

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 3/25/20 1:58 PM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: However there are two rules which must be followed:   1) Downloaded code must not allow the app to access any more system provided APIs that it could before.   2) Downloaded code must not allow the app to 'morph' (as Richard put

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2020-03-25 20:52, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: But, what I really would need to verify before I go that way, is whether Catalina allows livecode script to be downloaded and executed by the engine. Richard, it looks like you say it will, but Sean says no. Catalina in general does

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2020-03-25 19:31, Pi Digital via use-livecode wrote: In an app on the AppStore this is definitely a security risk from Apple’s point of view. Devs could insert any nefarious code into their app. This has been true from iOS2. Only content like video and images, maybe some animation data and so

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Richard and Sean: My app is desktop. One of the actions is clicking on a map to specify a data (of various kinds) profile across a great circle path. You really need a mouse to accurately select a point (although there are ways of magnifying small area to get precise location). Anyway, it does

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
revering to HTML5 deployment where it is pretty much encouraged to dissect where possible. Sean Cole Pi Digital > On 25 Mar 2020, at 19:08, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > wrote: > > Bill Prothero wrote: > > Richard and Sean, > > Good ideas. I had considered deploying

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Bill Prothero wrote: > Richard and Sean, > Good ideas. I had considered deploying it as a standalone that has > sections that udate from a server, but worried that the new security > requirements from Apple, in particular, discouraged (prohibited?) > downloading code. Is that not true? Is this de

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Prothero-earthlearningsol via use-livecode
s-tips-creating-content.html. > It's main purpose has been shifted more towards animators but still > functions just like Flash and Director with ActionScript. And deploys for > HTML5 too. > https://helpx.adobe.com/animate/how-to/convert-flash-ads-to-html5.html > > Sean >

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
tionScript. And deploys for HTML5 too. https://helpx.adobe.com/animate/how-to/convert-flash-ads-to-html5.html Sean On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > William Prothero wrote: > > > I’m back working on an ed

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-25 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
William Prothero wrote: > I’m back working on an educational app teaching plate tectonics. > When I think of pitfalls of distributing an actual app, I fondly > look at web distribution, like I used to be able to do with Director > in shockwave. Shockwave made many things about deployment simpler

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-24 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
latively easy steps. What I’ve achieved > in about a year on and off is evidence that it is capable once the ‘caveats‘ > get ironed out. Watch this space. > > Sean Cole > Pi Digital > > >> On 23 Mar 2020, at 21:57, William Prothero via use-livecode >> w

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
wrote: > > Sean: > It looks really nice If HTML5 deployment didn’t look so quirky and require > such a variety of other than livecode skills, I’d give it a try. I hope it > will mature before I get too old to care. > Bill > > William A. Prothero > h

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Sean: It looks really nice If HTML5 deployment didn’t look so quirky and require such a variety of other than livecode skills, I’d give it a try. I hope it will mature before I get too old to care. Bill William A. Prothero https://earthlearningsolutions.org

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Thanks Colin. That’s definitely helpful. From that I discern that it is something in your code from the point where the first ‘on openCard’ happens to the next openCard. An excellent method I use in these cases are to create messages to the JS console in Chrome by using something like this: on

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
ur main page. >>> >>> So, I’m curious about the method you go through to get to this point of >>> error. Here are a series of questions that should get to the bottom of it. >>> >>> What platform are you running on? >>> What platforms are you build

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
I deselect everything in standalone application settings except for HTML5. I choose Save as Standalone Application, and when it is done I copy the files into a folder inside my home / Sites folder. I do rename the html to index.html because another approach I was trying required there to be an

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
>> error. Here are a series of questions that should get to the bottom of it. >> >> What platform are you running on? >> What platforms are you building for as set in the standalone settings? >> What browser are you running the HTML5 deployment in? >> How have

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-23 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
m curious about the method you go through to get to this point of > error. Here are a series of questions that should get to the bottom of it. > > What platform are you running on? > What platforms are you building for as set in the standalone settings? > What browser are you ru

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-22 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
Mac, only building for HTML5, tried different browsers, but mainly Safari, local server set up with: php -S localhost:8080 The graphics of the stack appear, but is covered by a gray box, that may or may not be something in the stack. I can tell from a field that shows the current date that

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-22 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
. Here are a series of questions that should get to the bottom of it. What platform are you running on? What platforms are you building for as set in the standalone settings? What browser are you running the HTML5 deployment in? How have you setup your localhost server? Finally What is your recipe

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-21 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
I have only used the standalone publishing, I’m not doing anything custom. Line 48 of standalone-community-9.5.1.js is what is talking to the stdio.html file. That part of the code says this: http.open("POST",”stdio.html" ___ use-livecode mailing li

Re: Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-21 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Hi Colin What is it that is requesting stdio.html. In your HTML is there any reference to it? I’m using HTML5 deployment daily but have not come across this. Sean Cole Pi Digital > On 21 Mar 2020, at 21:31, Colin Holgate via use-livecode > wrote: > > I’m trying to get a st

Getting HTML5 going

2020-03-21 Thread Colin Holgate via use-livecode
I’m trying to get a stack going in HTML5, and there is a 404 error about a file named stdio.html. Is that a file I’m supposed to get from somewhere else? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe

Re: HTML5 deployment

2020-02-01 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Sean wrote: > > 4. As with 3 also, emscripten itself has capabilities built in that will > allow for this so I will more likely utilise these rather than use JQuery. > The idea will be to handle as much as possible within the emscripten code > and have minimal stuff within the HTML output other

Re: HTML5 deployment

2020-02-01 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
. wheel) and modifier keys. > > Then one could use native fields so that the browser does the keyboard job > and executes all shortcuts for fields. > To get/set field values is easy. A native styled field is also possible > (see my demo at hyperhh.de/html5). > > My techniqu

Re: HTML5 deployment

2020-02-01 Thread hh via use-livecode
also possible (see my demo at hyperhh.de/html5). My technique is to use ordinary LC fields, hide these (and optionally use them as container). Then adjust the native field rects to these hidden field rects in the movestack/resizestack handlers. * For 3 it would be enough to define ONE 'window&#

Re: HTML5 deployment

2020-01-31 Thread Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 22:14, hh via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Sean C. wrote (in thread 'Brave'): > > ... can you put together a priority list of items that need to > > be fixed in HTML5 deployment as I am currently adjusting the code. >

HTML5 deployment

2020-01-31 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Sean C. wrote (in thread 'Brave'): > ... can you put together a priority list of items that need to > be fixed in HTML5 deployment as I am currently adjusting the code. > I mean things that should just work without running external > JS workarounds like most of the key

HTML5: Native PlainText Fields

2019-12-12 Thread hh via use-livecode
We already have HTML5: Native RichText Field https://hyperhh.de/html5/HTML5Field_v106-9.5.0X.html This is now a bit simpler (and simpler to implement): HTML5: Native PlainText Fields (basic example) The stack, downloadable from http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?p=186081#p186081 has a

Livecode field htmlText to HTML5/CSS

2019-12-12 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
Does anyone have a library  to  - as fully as possible - convert LC9 Livecode htmlText to HTML5/CSS that I could use, beg, borrow, steal, or nominally license? I have bits and pieces - a handler to convert the tag to a style="..."> for font face, size, etc. and some other bit

Re: html5-IDE v100_alpha

2019-11-27 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Tom G. wrote: > Is it to have an easier time testing html 5 features?. is it to turn it > into a product? The SE and the messaging between the standalones is already basically done in earlier parts of my html5 samples. To improve the scriptEditor (which is 80% codeMirror) and

Re: html5-IDE v100_alpha

2019-11-27 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
I should left out the world "defense"... A big compliment for making this. This project shows the potential of the HTML5 LiveCode builder beside all your other contributions related to HTML5 LiveCode which is a great help for others. On 27/11/2019, 00:03, "use-livecode on b

Re: html5-IDE v100_alpha

2019-11-26 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
se of the HTML5 standalone builder: > > Enjoy html5IDE v100_alpha. A LC-playground with 'integrated' > propertyInspector, dictionary, scriptEditor and tools. > > http://hyperhh.de/html5/html5IDE.html > > You can create objects, edit their properties and their script. &

html5-IDE v100_alpha

2019-11-26 Thread hh via use-livecode
A few more words in defense of the HTML5 standalone builder: Enjoy html5IDE v100_alpha. A LC-playground with 'integrated' propertyInspector, dictionary, scriptEditor and tools. http://hyperhh.de/html5/html5IDE.html You can create objects, edit their properties and their script. More

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-20 Thread Riko Abadi via use-livecode
If you don't mind, can you provide an encryption library for html5. Thanks Sean. Pada tanggal Rab, 20 Nov 2019 pukul 11.28 Pi Digital via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> menulis: > What specific help do you need Riko? > > Sean Cole > Pi Digital Prod Ltd >

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
ivecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> menulis: > >> I’ve made an aes encryption library for HTML5 deployment for handling the >> data I pull from our server via php and js. But AES is not as robust as I >> would like for the kind of sensitive data we are dealing with so

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Riko Abadi via use-livecode
@Pi Digital I will gladly accept your help. Thanks Pada tanggal Rab, 20 Nov 2019 pukul 10.14 Pi Digital via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> menulis: > I’ve made an aes encryption library for HTML5 deployment for handling the > data I pull from our server via php and js

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
I’ve made an aes encryption library for HTML5 deployment for handling the data I pull from our server via php and js. But AES is not as robust as I would like for the kind of sensitive data we are dealing with so I’m going to make an RSA soon. AES cyphers are easy to create and require very

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Richard G. wrote: > That said, password protection only applies to the on-disk > representation of a stack. Once in memory, the algorithms of > any program made with any tool can be dumped and disassembled. Little Criminals, I like this song by Randy Newman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MD

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Riko A. wrote: > How do i protect my application with a password? I use livecode business. In the File/Standalone Application Settings go to Tab "Stacks". At bottom right you find a check and a field for the password. ___ use-livecode mailing list use

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Riko Abadi via use-livecode
Thanks hh for your respon, How do i protect my application with a password? I use livecode business. Thanks Pada tanggal Rab, 20 Nov 2019 01.08, hh via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> menulis: > > Riko A. wrote: > > Is it possible to encrypt a standalone htm

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Riko Abadi wrote: > is it possible to encrypt a standalone html5 file. So it can't be > downloaded and unzipped. So other people can see our logic script. > for example: http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2X.html > http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2.zip > > I can

Re: encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Riko A. wrote: > Is it possible to encrypt a standalone html5 file. > So it can't be downloaded and unzipped. So other > people can see our logic script. for example: > http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2X.html > http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2.zip I did

encrypt a standalone html5

2019-11-19 Thread Riko Abadi via use-livecode
Helllo, is it possible to encrypt a standalone html5 file. So it can't be downloaded and unzipped. So other people can see our logic script. for example: http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2X.html http://hyperhh.de/html5/CopyPaste-8.0.2.zip I can see the stack card and copy the logic. I

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-19 Thread kee nethery via use-livecode
> On Nov 19, 2019, at 12:01 AM, hh via use-livecode > wrote: > > TMHO there are so few license holders in HTML5 that > there is nearly no step forward in that field -- sadly > a downward spiral. Interesting. And I was waiting for it to be production ready before paying

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-19 Thread hh via use-livecode
A few words in defence of the LC HTML5 standalone builder. 1. > Pi wrote: > To answer your subject heading, I did some calculating based on the > current state of HTML5 deployment and my own experience in doing the > fixes single-handed for it. I work it out in the region of £15k.

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-19 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
Hi Alain I truly feel your pain. To answer your subject heading, I did some calculating based on the current state of HTML5 deployment and my own experience in doing the fixes single-handed for it. I work it out in the region of £15k. It’s an effing mess. Go to quality.livecode.co.uk and

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-19 Thread hh via use-livecode
r. I have shown that already long ago with some of my HTML5 examples (available incl. source code). TMHO there are so few license holders in HTML5 that there is nearly no step forward in that field -- sadly a downward spiral. Sadly, because there are already a *lot* of features implemented --

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-18 Thread Tom Glod via use-livecode
Yeah.. I hear you. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM Alain Vezina via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I gave up regular LC to get interested in HTML5 from LiveCode a year ago. > My intention was to transform my apps to get me out of Apple's tyran

Re: How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Alain Vezina wrote: > I gave up regular LC to get interested in HTML5 from LiveCode a year > ago. My intention was to transform my apps to get me out of Apple's > tyranny. I was first enchanted by this product, but I quickly became > disillusioned when I realized that b

How much do we have to pay to get a minimum of efficiency from HTML5

2019-11-18 Thread Alain Vezina via use-livecode
I gave up regular LC to get interested in HTML5 from LiveCode a year ago. My intention was to transform my apps to get me out of Apple's tyranny. I was first enchanted by this product, but I quickly became disillusioned when I realized that basic commands and functions in LC like read from

Re: HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread hh via use-livecode
Possibly the server of your webpage is very slow. I need here at most 9-10 seconds to load a standalone the first time from http://hyperhh.de/html5 . You could load one of the latest (9.5.0 created) there and compare. Or you have conflict with SOP (same origin policy). Is your standalone trying

Re: HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
quicker than the download itself). I use the developer tools in Chrome to throttle the network speed to 8Mbps (1MByte/s) and it downloads in 10seconds and has the whole app displayed 15seconds after full reload. look in the guide in the dictionary under HTML5 deployment and Advanced: Speeding Up

HTML5

2019-10-03 Thread Alain Vezina via use-livecode
How come when I test my app in the developement test using my browser, everything is ok. and when I test the same app as standalone in my web site, nothing appear after 3 or 4 minutes? My standalone-commercial-9.0.2.js is 28.5 Mo. I guess that is the reason... Alain Vezina logilangue.com __

HTML5: MultiWindows and GoStackURL v155

2019-09-22 Thread hh via use-livecode
This is my last HTML5-contribution for a while (I'm waiting for LC input to HTML5). This is now more javascript than intended. But the LC mouse coordinates computation has a bug (was reported by Bernd). You can now grab and resize all windows and reorder the layers of them (incl. the main w

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-09-01 Thread hh via use-livecode
all you need from substacks and write a reset handler to the mainstack. • use go stack url (urls use SOP) from that mainstack. • load script only stacks from a local filesystem Then the engine is loaded only once. See my HTML5 samples TestInStandalone (button insert local li

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-09-01 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
a.org/2017/02/a-cartoon-intro-to-webassembly/ On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, 21:43 William Prothero via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Folks: > I’m considering making a web site that will use livecode’s html5 engine. > Is this practical? > > What I want to cre

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Is there a way to force a reload of the bit you want (need) to reload, > without reloading the engine ? A reload doesn't reload the engine at any rate. To the contrary, it usually just resets the standalone if the engine is (also on server) identical. So reloading a standalone or loading anothe

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
On 31/08/2019 14:52, Pi Digital via use-livecode wrote: I absolutely agree with everything else Hermann states though. You must set up your server to speed up download. But if you reload the page manually you are effectively forcing it to ignore the cache and download everything again. If you

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
I would mainly only use HTML5 deployment for Web Apps rather than web pages. Much better to use some pre-made web template, Wordpress or learn and use native HTML5 & CSS3. I’m converting for my client two of his commercial desktop apps being used by sales agents over to Web Apps as h

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread Rick Harrison via use-livecode
Hi hh, I’m glad you are happy, and have found LC HTML5 useful for what you are doing. For my needs it was not up to the task, or simply just not the correct tool for the job. I can see how it can be good for small quick programs for learning examples, and I’m glad it works for you. Sorry, I do

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread Rick Harrison via use-livecode
t; On Aug 31, 2019, at 10:14 AM, William Prothero via use-livecode > wrote: > > Folks, > Thanks for your thoughts on LC HTML5 for web pages. I use LC increasingly > only for my own projects, even though I own a commercial license. I’m retired > and give away any education appl

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread JJS via use-livecode
I always like it when you give these well thought replies, Richard. Opposed to me, i flap some things out sometimes too quick. Op 31-8-2019 om 19:19 schreef Richard Gaskin via use-livecode: William Prothero wrote: > ...I’m wondering whether it might be easier and better to just use > the engi

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
William Prothero wrote: > ...I’m wondering whether it might be easier and better to just use > the engine as a cgi and do everything in css and html. Yes. On the sever, LC makes as good a choice for CGIs as nearly anything else. On the client there are many options, including browser-native HT

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Rick H. wrote: > LC HTML5 engine in my opinion isn’t practical for many of the > reasons other’s have stated... > ... What does work for making websites/webpages is: > Apache 2.x, LC Server, databases such as PostgreSQL, > non-LC HTML5, and CSS. I have made with nearly eve

Re: Is HTML5 really practical?

2019-08-31 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Folks, Thanks for your thoughts on LC HTML5 for web pages. I use LC increasingly only for my own projects, even though I own a commercial license. I’m retired and give away any education applications that I create. For simple web page projects, though, I start with WordPress. There is a lot of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >