Thanks for the kind words Andre. We are almost done with our v1 API. I will
get you a copy asap.
Best regards,
Mark Talluto
http://www.canelasoftware.com
On May 5, 2011, at 10:51 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
> I've seen SpiceKit during the conference and I Like It!
>
> You have my [LIKE] faceb
Hi William,
We have received inquires from a variety of software developers that cover the
gamut with unique needs. Our business modal is very accommodating and tailored
to work with the needs of our clients. The service is free to setup and try
out. We only charge a reasonable percentage on
Looks real interesting. The brochure doesn't mention your method of earning
money. I hope you have a plan for real small distribution at high per unit
cost (common method for custom vertical market software)
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
> I've seen SpiceKit during the conf
I've seen SpiceKit during the conference and I Like It!
You have my [LIKE] facebook thing!
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 2, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Todd Geist wrote:
> >
> > I have just started working with it as well, and I spoke with Trevor
> about
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 2, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Todd Geist wrote:
>
> I have just started working with it as well, and I spoke with Trevor about
> it. I think that the docs are bit out of date. So I would say yes that it
> is probably likely.
>
>
> However, I have managed to make some good progress
Marty,
Thanks again for helping me as well.
-- Tom McGrath III
http://lazyriver.on-rev.com
3mcgr...@comcast.net
On May 5, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Marty Knapp wrote:
> I've been using the GLX Framework for the past year or so and it is a great
> piece of software. Trevor has put a ton of work into t
I've been using the GLX Framework for the past year or so and it is a
great piece of software. Trevor has put a ton of work into this and
provides it to the community at no cost - a big thank you to Trevor. I
don't use it for all my projects, but it's a vital part of my toolkit.
Marty Knapp
As the OP I think that once you spend some time with GLX_Framework it meets all
of these needs and then some. It is very powerful and can be daunting if you
are not looking for 'all' of it's functionality at first. But once it is set up
and you get used to what is what then it "ain't that bad".
Todd Geist wrote:
Frameworks exist for many other languages. PHP, Java, Groovy, Ruby, Python,
all have multiple frameworks. Ruby simply would not be the big deal it is
today if it had not been for Rails.
It would be great if Live Code had one.
And here you are, using one. :)
Personally I pref
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Todd Geist wrote:
>
> When I say "App". I mean something far more than a Stack or a script. I
> mean a maintainable, deployable, updatable application, that uses a
> reasonable approximation of contemporary UI and Interaction. Something that
> has a chance of maki
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> I dunno I think it's pretty dam easy out of the box! I mean, I don't have
> to worry about creating windows or menus or buttons or fields from scratch,
> someone did that for me already. I don't even have to think about how to get
> text from
I dunno I think it's pretty dam easy out of the box! I mean, I don't have to
worry about creating windows or menus or buttons or fields from scratch,
someone did that for me already. I don't even have to think about how to get
text from the user, manage memory, etc it all just works. I didn't th
As a relatively new user (couple of years), I wholeheartedly agree with the
framework concept. LC touts itself as being easy to use because of its
English syntax but the reality is that its learning curve is extremely
steep. I'm pretty sure there's a large number of people out there who have
simpl
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:35 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> Just to play devil's advocate: I find that GLX is overkill for almost all
> the apps I create. I prefer to use only code that actually applies to my
> project. I have my own set of common handlers and functions that I insert as
> needed, whi
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:35 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> The final argument against an official framework is that people would tend
> to use it without understanding the underlying concepts involved. Once you
> have those, building an app isn't really that difficult.
>
Hi Jacque,
I am not real
On 5/4/11 2:17 PM, william humphrey wrote:
Tod - you're comments about Framework are excellent. I too wish that
LiveCode chose Framework as the fully supported way to work with
applications. I integrate a Valentina database into my application and find
it truely difficult to make stand-alone buil
Tod - you're comments about Framework are excellent. I too wish that
LiveCode chose Framework as the fully supported way to work with
applications. I integrate a Valentina database into my application and find
it truely difficult to make stand-alone builds for Windows and MacOS
although I find the
Hello,
I haven't needed to do updates yet. So I can't really tell you if that
works yet. I have a lot of other non Framework code to write, first :>)
But this thread makes me thing of a related topic. Why is it so hard to
build an application in Live Code? Not a stack, but an actual applicatio
Todd,
Have you gotten any further with the framework?
I am mostly concerned with the ability to auto check for updates. I am willing
to give up on the built-in undo and even most of the externals for now. But
with out the auto check for updates I can't really use this framework.
Q: Do you need
Remo is still an active, viable product and Jerry Daniels does provide
support. I use it every day.
On 2 May 2011 19:25, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>
> One thing is the altPlugins no longer update and Remo & (what ever else it
> has been called) still works but has no support.
>
>
> -- Tom McGrat
One good thing about attempting to use the GLXframework is that I "found" all
of my old plugins and started to use them again. It is like old friends come to
visit. Save and Archive, Auto Save, Layout Manager. tm|color, tm|gradient,
tm|audio, Inspection Gadget, etc.
One thing is the
I have corrupted the launcher.rev twice now trying to include externals int the
framework. I don't know what I will do when I need the externals, yet.
When I include them in the standalone builder they don't show up with the Mac
builds. THe windows builds do include the externals. So if I move t
I have just started working with it as well, and I spoke with Trevor about
it. I think that the docs are bit out of date. So I would say yes that it
is probably likely.
However, I have managed to make some good progress with it and I am pretty
out of shape LC wise having been gone since rev 2 s
I am going through the screensteps tutorial/documents on how to use this
framework and I notice that they reference some things that are not necessarily
happening in the process. Like add a stack does not produce a dialog "Is this a
window or a library?".
Is this normal or expected?
-- Tom Mc
24 matches
Mail list logo
