Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > >> Am 18.03.2022 um 17:39 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>: > >> > >> Tony B on the FB group said that the funding goal was reached, I don't > know > >

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Me,too. About 8 hrs ago. Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 18.03.2022 um 17:44 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode > : > > Hi Tom, > >> Am 18.03.2022 um 17:39 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode >> : >> >> Tony B on the FB group said that the fundin

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Hi Tom, > Am 18.03.2022 um 17:39 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode > : > > Tony B on the FB group said that the funding goal was reached, I don't know > how he knows that, but I doubt he is just making it up. > Does anyone know where we can confirm the status? yes, I r

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Tony B on the FB group said that the funding goal was reached, I don't know how he knows that, but I doubt he is just making it up. Does anyone know where we can confirm the status? On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:26 PM J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Anyone on the fence should decide pretty quick, as of now there are less than 6 hours left to contribute. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On March 17, 2022 8:11:29 PM Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote: Thanks Bob, I'm sur

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Thanks Bob, I'm sure it will be honored. This is pretty important for livecode itself, I hope a way will be found even if target is not met. On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:35 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I originally popped for $198, but I just paid for a y

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

I originally popped for $198, but I just paid for a year's subscription. If I do not get the $198 back, oh well. Bob S > On Mar 16, 2022, at 17:57 , Tom Glod via use-livecode > wrote: > > Well...I threw in $100 to help make it happen...fingers crossed. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 8:53 PM T

Re: Funding

ll time to support the project. No risk, you get your >>> money back if it doesn't fund. I personally hope it does, the benefits >>> would be big. >>> -- >>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com >>> HyperActive Software | http://www

Re: Funding

I personally hope it does, the benefits >>> would be big. >>> -- >>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com >>> <mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com> >>> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com >>> <http

Re: Funding

activesw.com >> On March 17, 2022 11:47:05 AM "R.H. via use-livecode" >> wrote: >> >>> I did not receive any letter regardings any funding. >>> >>> Roland >>> ___ >>>

Re: Funding

om > On March 17, 2022 11:47:05 AM "R.H. via use-livecode" > wrote: > > > I did not receive any letter regardings any funding. > > > > Roland > > ___ > > use-livecode mailing list > > use-live

Re: Funding

1:47:05 AM "R.H. via use-livecode" wrote: I did not receive any letter regardings any funding. Roland ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscriptio

Re: Funding

e any letter regardings any funding. > > Roland > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runr

Funding

I did not receive any letter regardings any funding. Roland ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Well...I threw in $100 to help make it happen...fingers crossed. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 8:53 PM Tom Glod wrote: > I see the page I had bookmarked has a "-page" at the end of slug. > > https://livecode.com/script-compiler-project-page/ > > Thank you. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:27 PM J. La

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

I see the page I had bookmarked has a "-page" at the end of slug. https://livecode.com/script-compiler-project-page/ Thank you. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:27 PM J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On 3/16/22 5:46 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote: > >

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

On 3/16/22 5:46 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode wrote: When I go ot the page I only see the 3 options how do I get to the $99 option? I see six options. Do you have any plugins that might disable some of the javascript, or similar? Try a different browser, maybe? -- Jacqueline Landman Gay

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Tom, I get it (at least, £79 ~~Usd99) at https://livecode.com/the-script-compiler-project/ But I suspect it’s doing something clever to see if you’ve visited the page before, or if you’re logged in, or ….. Alex Sent from my iPad > On 16 Mar 2022, at 22:47, Tom Glod via use-livecode > wrote:

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

Forwhatever reasons I do not get the emails in regards to this project wtf. When I go ot the page I only see the 3 options how do I get to the $99 option? Can someone hook me up with a link? On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:02 PM J. Landman Gay via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wr

Re: Compiler Funding Options Update

I really hope this gets funded, we need it. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On March 16, 2022 11:33:34 AM Rick Harrison via use-livecode wrote: This project really needs to be fully funded if LiveCode is to move forward.

Compiler Funding Options Update

Hi LiveCoders, I just received a message from LiveCode Ltd., that stated the compiler has been 83% funded with just 1 day to go. This project really needs to be fully funded if LiveCode is to move forward. Quite often I find that our present version of LiveCode isn’t fast enough for me to be

Re: SGV and FE funding of widgets

On 2015-10-30 14:26, Matt Maier wrote: If it turns out that you can return a "normalized" SVG path does that mean we might be able to do some vector operations in script. Like separating/joining two different shapes/paths, or adjusting the control points of a shape? I meant to actually put a f

Re: SGV and FE funding of widgets

If it turns out that you can return a "normalized" SVG path does that mean we might be able to do some vector operations in script. Like separating/joining two different shapes/paths, or adjusting the control points of a shape? On Oct 30, 2015 04:32, "Mark Waddingham" wrote: > On 2015-10-30 10:35

Re: SGV and FE funding of widgets

On 2015-10-30 10:35, Frans Schoffelen wrote: So how do we get started? Well, on the SVG front things have already started: https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/3089 This still needs a bit more work (we're hoping to have it ready for LiveCode 8 DP9) but currently does the following:

Re: SGV and FE funding of widgets

> On 30 Oct 2015, at 04:50, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote: > > I just paid $7000 to get 64Bit Mic version of LC. I will pay $2500 to get > SVG started because it is important to me and the community. If LiveCode or > someone else wants to make it happen you know where to find me!!!

Re: HTML5 Pledge Campaign -- Funding Purchase Option

regards, >> >> Kevin >> >> Kevin Miller ~ ke...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ >> LiveCode: Everyone can code >> >> >> >> >> On 29/07/2014 19:09, "Ben Rubinstein" wrote: >> >>> Thanks for t

Re: HTML5 Pledge Campaign -- Funding Purchase Option

y just clicked into my last year of license from the last campaign; so if I do this funding purchase now, can it be applied when that ends, so that I'm covered for the next two years)? I'm guessing it will work like that, but it would be helpful to know for sure! Many thanks, Ben On 27/

Re: HTML5 Pledge Campaign -- Funding Purchase Option

er >this can be applied to extend an existing license (I've only just clicked >into >my last year of license from the last campaign; so if I do this funding >purchase now, can it be applied when that ends, so that I'm covered for >the >next two years)? > >I&

Re: HTML5 Pledge Campaign -- Funding Purchase Option

Thanks for this Brahmanathaswami - could someone from RunRev confirm whether this can be applied to extend an existing license (I've only just clicked into my last year of license from the last campaign; so if I do this funding purchase now, can it be applied when that ends, so that I'

HTML5 Pledge Campaign -- Funding Purchase Option

html5, we don't need that) from 2016-2019, $210.00 a year for just $630.00 This is called a "Funding Purchase" and goes to the campaign. What is the difference between a pledge and a Funding Purchase? A pledge gives you delivery of the new technology enabled by the camp

Re: Matching funding

On 7/19/2014, 12:11 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: It's a big incentive for people to donate, knowing that their donation is actually worth more than its cash value. Kevin sent out an email about this today. For those who haven't donated because they won't be using HTML5, it's to their advantage to

Re: Matching funding

Yes, there is a substantial chunk coming from multiple government bodies and some from other sources. The matching funding is very, very significant for us in that it extends our original Kickstarter runway. The grants get spent on development and do not impose any repayment burden on us in the

Re: Matching funding

.com/lcstackbrowser.html> and SQLiteAdmin <http://www.lcsql.com/sqliteadmin.html> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Mark Wilcox wrote: > The matched funding is in addition to the total. I don't know the exact > source but assume it's some government scheme, matched fun

Re: Matching funding

The matched funding is in addition to the total. I don't know the exact source but assume it's some government scheme, matched funding seems to be the preferred method in the UK. It's the main thing that makes the campaign worthwhile. They pre-sell licences people would need any

Matching funding

Reading the HTML5 FAQs in today's newsletter, there's mention of matching funds. I may have missed it in prior announcements but I didn't know about that. Any info available on where those matching funds will come form, if they are part of the $395k or in addition to, etc? Pete lcSQL Software

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

I have posted a message about the campaign "bring HTML5 to LiveCode" on the forum of the French site "01net" (forum: Logiciels/developpement) http://www.01net.com/ Jacques 2014-07-02 18:59 GMT+02:00 Dr. Hawkins : > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Mark Wilcox > wrote: > > > It's running in the

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Mark Wilcox wrote: > It's running in the browser, with the LiveCode engine compiled to > JavaScript. Compiling SQLite to JavaScript and running it locally in the > browser is not a great option - how will you reliably persist the data > and keep decent performance?

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

Just had a look at my account page and all it says is: Keep me informed of LiveCode special offers & updates Subscribe to our newsletter A survey is neither of the above? Perhaps you should have posted on the list that people wanting to take the survey can find the link on their account pag

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

And what does Livecode do to your clothes ? (sorry, I couldn't resist)... jbv > > I wash with Livecode because I see what it does to my clothes. > > Richmond. > ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subs

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

It's not about who'm you email, it's about what you say. I'm sure I'm part of those 85%, which is misleading. Why? Because the poll asked "What technology would be nice to have? please select all that apply.". HTML5 was part of that list. Meanwhile "Less bugs, and a better coding experience" wa

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

If you didn't get a survey request from us, either you are not signed up to receive emails from us (you've opted out of both promotional and newsletter lists), you spam filtered or bounced our mail, or you joined the community after we sent the survey. We sent that survey to every email address

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

On 02/07/14 00:09, Terence Heaford wrote: On 1 Jul 2014, at 16:16, Heather Laine wrote: We surveyed our entire user base and a massive 85% of you want HTML5 deployment, ASAP. Nobody surveyed me? —Terry Nor me. "a massive 85%" ??? "our entire user base" That is not true: all the kid

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

On 1 Jul 2014, at 16:16, Heather Laine wrote: > We surveyed our entire user base and a massive 85% of you want HTML5 > deployment, ASAP. Nobody surveyed me? —Terry ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

> My concern is that it have local, in-memory SQLite wherever it happens to > be running, whether that be the browser or the server. > > > -- > Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. It's running in the browser, with the LiveCode engine compiled to JavaScript. Compiling SQLite to JavaScript and running i

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

gt; >> http://livecode.com/livecode-to-html5/ >> >> We surveyed our entire user base and a massive 85% of you want HTML5 >> deployment, ASAP.Today we are launching the Crowd Funding Campaign to make >> it happen. This is a project for making LiveCode the complete app >

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

HTML5 deployment, ASAP.Today we are launching the Crowd Funding Campaign to make it happen. This is a project for making LiveCode the complete app development solution that we all want, and to bring it to you faster. It’s a project to change the way we create and deliver apps. If you want t

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Richmond wrote: > > All I can offer you right now is my best wishes and a pious hope that the > HTML5 deployment will NOT > rely on a web-download as did the LC version 4 revPlayer widget. My concern is that it have local, in-memory SQLite wherever it happens to

Re: We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

Funding Campaign to make it happen. This is a project for making LiveCode the complete app development solution that we all want, and to bring it to you faster. It’s a project to change the way we create and deliver apps. If you want to see LiveCode deploying to the Web please get involved with the

We're Funding LiveCode For the Web

Dear List Folks, You told us we need to bring HTML5 Web Delivery to LiveCode. We listened: http://livecode.com/livecode-to-html5/ We surveyed our entire user base and a massive 85% of you want HTML5 deployment, ASAP.Today we are launching the Crowd Funding Campaign to make it happen. This is

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Sorry, I meant Richmond. Can I blame speel coreect? On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:23 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > Bob Sneidar wrote: > > > Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type > > in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I > > copied that from one o

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Bob Sneidar wrote: > Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type > in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I > copied that from one of Richards posts. There's your problem: the NSA has me blacklisted because I often write favorable things about

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I copied that from one of Richards posts. Bob On Mar 18, 2014, at 10:57 , Peter M. Brigham wrote: > On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > >> I’

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on > this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a > problem could they? "Cheese" ??? -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comc

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

On 17/03/14 17:44, Bob Sneidar wrote: I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a problem could they? Bob On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:11 , Richmond mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote: e

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a problem could they? Bob On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:11 , Richmond mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote: environment-cum-language ___

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/15/14, 2:11 PM, Richmond wrote: This doesn't stop me thinking that, perhaps, other things are more urgent right now. Which is why I haven't entered it as a feature request in the database. It's a minor enhancement that can easily wait. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hype

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

will be further criticisms which may be accurate, and detract from sales, uptake, and so forth. - The title of this thread is "Crowd Funding Enhancements"; and as the vast majority of us 'here' on the Use-list are very keen on that sort of thing, we should let the RunRev team

RE: Crowd Funding Enhancements

ecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On > Behalf Of J. Landman Gay > Sent: den 15 mars 2014 18:44 > To: How to use LiveCode > Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements > > On 3/15/14, 12:16 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:43 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Exactly. It seems so natural that even though I've been using xtalk since > 1987, I still inadvertently try to use that structure occasionally. I > suspect new users will too. But as Richmond says, it's a trivial feature > request, and ther

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/15/14, 12:16 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. 1) Precedents for this structure already exist in the language, so it's not a departure:

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 15/03/14 19:16, Scott Rossi wrote: We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. I wouldn't deny that it wouldn't be welcome. However, as there IS a way of getting that s

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. 1) Precedents for this structure already exist in the language, so it's not a departure: repeat for each item x in "a,b,c". 2) The

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 15/03/14 17:50, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: That'd be nice. And as long as we're dreaming, how about: repeat for each card c in this stack repeat for each button b of this card I had to do that for myself way back in hypercard . . . it was

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > That'd be nice. And as long as we're dreaming, how about: > > repeat for each card c in this stack > repeat for each button b of this card > I had to do that for myself way back in hypercard . . . it was absolutely necessary for what I wa

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

+1 On Mar 10, 2014, at 19:15 , J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 3/10/14, 9:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: >> Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk >> expressions. For example: >> >> delete item 4 of each line of tVar >> >> put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSa

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I also like expanding the reach of each. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Terence Heaford wrote: > Here's one I'd like to see. > > "Native controls in the Cocoa Port". > > Oh dear, I thought we were already getting that one. > > > All the best > > Terry > > >

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Here’s one I’d like to see. “Native controls in the Cocoa Port”. Oh dear, I thought we were already getting that one. All the best Terry ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/10/14, 9:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk expressions. For example: delete item 4 of each line of tVar put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSave replace word 1 of each item of each line with "xyz" in tVar Maybe eve

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk expressions. For example: delete item 4 of each line of tVar put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSave replace word 1 of each item of each line with "xyz" in tVar Maybe even: put tArray[each key]["LastName"] & retur

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hmm. Thanks, Mark. I might try that. It's undoable, which is great for when I'm not staring at 9 or 10 point... On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Mike- > > Saturday, March 8, 2014, 1:12:50 PM, you wrote: > > > OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been invol

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Mike- Saturday, March 8, 2014, 1:12:50 PM, you wrote: > OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been involved with > several development tools where developers requested that antialiasing be > removed in the IDE. At smaller sizes, it definitely makes the text harder > to read. If i

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been involved with several development tools where developers requested that antialiasing be removed in the IDE. At smaller sizes, it definitely makes the text harder to read. On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 07/03/14 22:2

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 07/03/14 22:23, stephen barncard wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... Why? Go back to jaggy text? That does seem to be a backward step; and I cannot quite see why Mike is objecting to it. I wonder if he is having a

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: > because it can make the text harder to read. It makes the text blurry. that's an opinion. I think it make fonts look like the characters they are supposed to look like and expect it. I guess if its a feature it should be switchable. *--* *St

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

The antialiased text is a problem in script editors on multiple IDE's because it can make the text harder to read. It makes the text blurry. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner >wrote: > > > ge

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: > get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... Why? Go back to jaggy text? *--* *Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words* ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: > Hide the *&@^@!~)_# dollar-sign variables > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Richmond wrote: > >> If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a >> "revvariablewatcher.

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hide the *&@^@!~)_# dollar-sign variables On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Richmond wrote: > If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a > "revvariablewatcher.rev" file. > > If you move that into your plug-ins folder it might prove useful. > > What I don't understand is

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a "revvariablewatcher.rev" file. If you move that into your plug-ins folder it might prove useful. What I don't understand is why that file is there in the Toolset' directory when there seems to be no way to call it up from w

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 01/03/14 12:13, Mark Schonewille wrote: Mike, It used to be like that, along time ago. There was a window, called Variable Watcher, which was probably inherited from HyperCard. The Message Watcher, also inherited from HyperCard, still exists in a separate window. http://forums.runrev.c

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Mike, It used to be like that, along time ago. There was a window, called Variable Watcher, which was probably inherited from HyperCard. The Message Watcher, also inherited from HyperCard, still exists in a separate window. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and So

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 01/03/14 01:04, J. Landman Gay wrote: You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" crowd. This is why there needs to be a "choices" script-editor, where the multiple windows people can have multiple windows, and the Russell and Carnap crowd can have everything i

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

There are times when one window to rule them all is great, and there are times, like today, when it is so not so great. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" > crowd. But anyway, I asked for a detachable v

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'm all for backing another crowd sourcing, as long as the features are attainable within X amount of time and there's a list of said features before hand. I like some of the ideas put forth before me. +1 On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > You'll have to fight with the "

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" crowd. But anyway, I asked for a detachable variable watcher a long time ago. I think I may have put in a feature request for it but I may have just talked to someone about it. It was a long time ago. On 2/28/14, 3:53 PM,

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

+1 from me on that one. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: > here's another one: when debugging, how about putti

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

here's another one: when debugging, how about putting variables in a separate window so they aren't competing for scarce vertical space with the script? On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > GLX2 used to do this if I recall, and so did Remo. I wonder if the code is > still ther

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

GLX2 used to do this if I recall, and so did Remo. I wonder if the code is still there somewhere? Bob On Feb 16, 2014, at 13:38 , Richmond wrote: > On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: >> I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how >> about split screen (hori

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Thanks for that Jacque. I knew about the prefs setting but not moving a tab into another window. My split pane suggestion was to see separate parts of the same script, one above the other. With that, right clicking on a handler name and going to its definition would show both the original handl

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

And as per previous, I'd like to be able to have two columns for reading scripts (like pages of a book) for these extra-wide monitors. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:31 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 2/16/14, 3:38 PM, Richmond wrote: > >> On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: >> >>> I'd vote for th

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 2/16/14, 3:38 PM, Richmond wrote: On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. It would be very useful if one could see two scripts, e

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. It would be very useful if one could see two scripts, either side-by-side or above each othe

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Another: When I'm in a script, and I select a handler/function and pick "Go To Definition", I'd like to be able to have a "go back", like in a browser, that takes me back to where I was in the script I just left. If the code is in a different script it's not a big deal, because a different tab ope

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > > > The only downside with that visualization is that it takes a large screen to really see what's going on. Might be nice to also have some other automated graphic view - what else is floating around in the Git world for that? > Thanks Ri

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Trevor DeVore wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Kevin Miller wrote: Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A long time with heads down and only internal dps so far. But in terms of actual throughput its been massive. The other goal

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Kay C Lan wrote: It's too late to start now, but I'm sure it would make for an interesting info-graphic, one that continually recorded and then displayed the man hours and Kickstarter £ spent on the various 'areas' that the Runrev team is focusing on as they move LC forward. I'm sure refactor and

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Kevin I'm not sure how far you are internally with your Agile / FOSS processes, but wouldn't it be a good idea to share more data regarding the work actually being done? On 10 February 2014 16:19, Kevin Miller wrote: > Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A >

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'd be happy to support a crowd funding initiative for the LiveCode community. Monte's suggestion for an organised RunRev supported FOSS "bounty" site is the way to go in my opinion. I'm happy to put work into this from March 1st? On 11 February 2014 08:26, Jan Schenke

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

- On Mon, 2/10/14, Tim Selander wrote: Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements To: "How to use LiveCode" Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 5:30 PM Hi Jan, I have on two occassions (pre-open source and post-open source) downloaded and tried Quartam Reports. But both times it

  1   2   >