Doc-
Monday, July 23, 2012, 7:41:05 AM, you wrote:
> This stack has a lengthy script (thousands of lines), but openCard &
> closeCard are empty (to intercept before the main stack).
Aha! This is a substack? Sounds like something in the mainstack is
getting triggered. Any pre-xxx handlers in the
Dr. Hawkins wrote:
This stack has a lengthy script (thousands of lines), but openCard &
closeCard are empty (to intercept before the main stack).
This stack starts with a simple placeholder card, which is removed o ce a
"real" card is created (this is the output stack).
I forget whether I saved
On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> Sunday, July 22, 2012, 7:05:38 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Thwo thirds of a seconding messages to create an empty card???
>
> You're doing something wrong. On a not-particularly-fast machine I can
> create 100 cards in 300 milliseconds. If I lock messages *
Dr Hawkins,
I have stacks with about 3000 cards and I don't see any performance issue
(except when I am looping all 3000 cards processing 20 fields in each of
them). Are you using a background group that is too heavy?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Sunday, July 22, 201
Doc-
Sunday, July 22, 2012, 7:05:38 PM, you wrote:
> Thwo thirds of a seconding messages to create an empty card???
You're doing something wrong. On a not-particularly-fast machine I can
create 100 cards in 300 milliseconds. If I lock messages *and
especially if I lock screen* I can create 1000
On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Chipp Walters wrote:
>
> Try it in a standalone. Don't forget neither SuperCard's nor HC's IDE was
> written using their language. There's overhead in the IDE which doesn't
> exist in standalones.
this particular one had similar times in the standalone.
but, as mentioned
Try it in a standalone. Don't forget neither SuperCard's nor HC's IDE was
written using their language. There's overhead in the IDE which doesn't
exist in standalones.
Use multiple break points and 'run' from one to the next (instead of step
in/over) if you're having problems with the debugger. It
On 7/22/12 9:05 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
Thwo thirds of a seconding messages to create an empty card???
How big is your stack? It's instantaneous in a new stack.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_
Ivelong figured ther was a bottleneck, especially after learning about
locking messages while deleting cards.
But for crying out loud . . .
Single stepping,and getting frustrated with the debugger. Step ore a
"create card," and the debugger leaps about five lines. Step into,and face
both empty
