On 7/6/13 8:20 AM, Warren Samples wrote:
On 06/25/2013 09:52 AM, Roger Eller wrote:
I tried setting the textfont of this stack to the textfont of stack
"home".
Still it returned empty when I put the textFont of any field in my stack.
I didn't see this until it showed up as a quote in the next
Thank you for confirming and filing a bug report. What I had to do was case
the platform, and loop through all the fields and buttons, explicitly
setting the font according to the Windows version standard. I have NEVER
had to do this prior to LC 5.5.x and 6.x.x.
~Roger
On Jul 6, 2013 9:21 AM, "War
On 06/25/2013 09:52 AM, Roger Eller wrote:
I tried setting the textfont of this stack to the textfont of stack "home".
Still it returned empty when I put the textFont of any field in my stack.
I have users on XP and 7, so I think I will just loop through all the
fields in preOpenStack and set th
I tried setting the textfont of this stack to the textfont of stack "home".
Still it returned empty when I put the textFont of any field in my stack.
I have users on XP and 7, so I think I will just loop through all the
fields in preOpenStack and set the appropriate textFont. I'll report back
if
; An: How to use LiveCode
> Betreff: Re: Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0
>
> Another weirdness is that patterns that I used in Rev 4.0 don't display
> anymore. However, if I add the revPatterns.rev or something like that to
> the Stacks section of the
Another weirdness is that patterns that I used in Rev 4.0 don't display
anymore. However, if I add the revPatterns.rev or something like that to
the Stacks section of the standalone builder, suddenly the fonts are OK.
What's going on? That shouldn't even be related. Patterns then appear
correctly t
On 6/24/13 9:14 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
This isn't for mobile. I'm seeing this difference on the same machine. It's
just IDE -vs- standalone for Windows.
Oops. That's pretty odd then. It could be the font size, maybe. I know
some Windows fonts look scrawny at a different size than the IDE uses.
This isn't for mobile. I'm seeing this difference on the same machine. It's
just IDE -vs- standalone for Windows.
~Roger
On Jun 24, 2013 10:07 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> On 6/24/13 3:43 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
>
>> In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I
>> a
On 6/24/13 3:43 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I
am moving forward, but text is becoming extremely bitmapped in appearance.
I have tried LiveCode 5.5.4, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2, all with the same results.
In all cases, the stacks look
In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I
am moving forward, but text is becoming extremely bitmapped in appearance.
I have tried LiveCode 5.5.4, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2, all with the same results.
In all cases, the stacks look fine in the IDE, but as a standalone they
g
10 matches
Mail list logo
