Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Sorry, I meant Richmond. Can I blame speel coreect? On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:23 , Richard Gaskin wrote: > Bob Sneidar wrote: > > > Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type > > in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I > > copied that from one o

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Bob Sneidar wrote: > Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type > in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I > copied that from one of Richards posts. There's your problem: the NSA has me blacklisted because I often write favorable things about

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

Just pointing out that we need to be careful about the words we type in our emails if we want them to get past people’s spam filters. I copied that from one of Richards posts. Bob On Mar 18, 2014, at 10:57 , Peter M. Brigham wrote: > On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > >> I’

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on > this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a > problem could they? "Cheese" ??? -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comc

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

On 17/03/14 17:44, Bob Sneidar wrote: I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a problem could they? Bob On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:11 , Richmond mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote: e

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements - Found word(s) cum in the Text body

I’m not sure what kinds of words or phrases might trigger a spam filter on this list. Words in a phrase like this could not POSSIBLY be causing a problem could they? Bob On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:11 , Richmond mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote: environment-cum-language ___

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/15/14, 2:11 PM, Richmond wrote: This doesn't stop me thinking that, perhaps, other things are more urgent right now. Which is why I haven't entered it as a feature request in the database. It's a minor enhancement that can easily wait. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hype

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

will be further criticisms which may be accurate, and detract from sales, uptake, and so forth. - The title of this thread is "Crowd Funding Enhancements"; and as the vast majority of us 'here' on the Use-list are very keen on that sort of thing, we should let the RunRev team

RE: Crowd Funding Enhancements

ecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On > Behalf Of J. Landman Gay > Sent: den 15 mars 2014 18:44 > To: How to use LiveCode > Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements > > On 3/15/14, 12:16 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:43 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Exactly. It seems so natural that even though I've been using xtalk since > 1987, I still inadvertently try to use that structure occasionally. I > suspect new users will too. But as Richmond says, it's a trivial feature > request, and ther

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/15/14, 12:16 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. 1) Precedents for this structure already exist in the language, so it's not a departure:

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 15/03/14 19:16, Scott Rossi wrote: We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. I wouldn't deny that it wouldn't be welcome. However, as there IS a way of getting that s

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

We have all been doing what you suggest for years, which is precisely the point. There are several reasons why having "repeat for each Š" would be extremely welcome. 1) Precedents for this structure already exist in the language, so it's not a departure: repeat for each item x in "a,b,c". 2) The

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 15/03/14 17:50, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: That'd be nice. And as long as we're dreaming, how about: repeat for each card c in this stack repeat for each button b of this card I had to do that for myself way back in hypercard . . . it was

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > That'd be nice. And as long as we're dreaming, how about: > > repeat for each card c in this stack > repeat for each button b of this card > I had to do that for myself way back in hypercard . . . it was absolutely necessary for what I wa

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

+1 On Mar 10, 2014, at 19:15 , J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 3/10/14, 9:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: >> Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk >> expressions. For example: >> >> delete item 4 of each line of tVar >> >> put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSa

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I also like expanding the reach of each. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Terence Heaford wrote: > Here's one I'd like to see. > > "Native controls in the Cocoa Port". > > Oh dear, I thought we were already getting that one. > > > All the best > > Terry > > >

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Here’s one I’d like to see. “Native controls in the Cocoa Port”. Oh dear, I thought we were already getting that one. All the best Terry ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 3/10/14, 9:04 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk expressions. For example: delete item 4 of each line of tVar put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSave replace word 1 of each item of each line with "xyz" in tVar Maybe eve

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Here's one I'd like to see: the use of "each" in conjunction with chunk expressions. For example: delete item 4 of each line of tVar put item 1 to 3 of each line of tVar into tSave replace word 1 of each item of each line with "xyz" in tVar Maybe even: put tArray[each key]["LastName"] & retur

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hmm. Thanks, Mark. I might try that. It's undoable, which is great for when I'm not staring at 9 or 10 point... On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > Mike- > > Saturday, March 8, 2014, 1:12:50 PM, you wrote: > > > OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been invol

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Mike- Saturday, March 8, 2014, 1:12:50 PM, you wrote: > OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been involved with > several development tools where developers requested that antialiasing be > removed in the IDE. At smaller sizes, it definitely makes the text harder > to read. If i

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

OSX 10.9.2, and I'm a little surprised, because I've been involved with several development tools where developers requested that antialiasing be removed in the IDE. At smaller sizes, it definitely makes the text harder to read. On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 07/03/14 22:2

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 07/03/14 22:23, stephen barncard wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... Why? Go back to jaggy text? That does seem to be a backward step; and I cannot quite see why Mike is objecting to it. I wonder if he is having a

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: > because it can make the text harder to read. It makes the text blurry. that's an opinion. I think it make fonts look like the characters they are supposed to look like and expect it. I guess if its a feature it should be switchable. *--* *St

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

The antialiased text is a problem in script editors on multiple IDE's because it can make the text harder to read. It makes the text blurry. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner >wrote: > > > ge

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: > get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... Why? Go back to jaggy text? *--* *Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words* ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

get rid of antialiasing in the script editor... On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: > Hide the *&@^@!~)_# dollar-sign variables > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Richmond wrote: > >> If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a >> "revvariablewatcher.

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hide the *&@^@!~)_# dollar-sign variables On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Richmond wrote: > If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a > "revvariablewatcher.rev" file. > > If you move that into your plug-ins folder it might prove useful. > > What I don't understand is

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

If you look in the 'Toolset' directory of Livecode 6.6 you will find a "revvariablewatcher.rev" file. If you move that into your plug-ins folder it might prove useful. What I don't understand is why that file is there in the Toolset' directory when there seems to be no way to call it up from w

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 01/03/14 12:13, Mark Schonewille wrote: Mike, It used to be like that, along time ago. There was a window, called Variable Watcher, which was probably inherited from HyperCard. The Message Watcher, also inherited from HyperCard, still exists in a separate window. http://forums.runrev.c

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Mike, It used to be like that, along time ago. There was a window, called Variable Watcher, which was probably inherited from HyperCard. The Message Watcher, also inherited from HyperCard, still exists in a separate window. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and So

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 01/03/14 01:04, J. Landman Gay wrote: You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" crowd. This is why there needs to be a "choices" script-editor, where the multiple windows people can have multiple windows, and the Russell and Carnap crowd can have everything i

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

There are times when one window to rule them all is great, and there are times, like today, when it is so not so great. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" > crowd. But anyway, I asked for a detachable v

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'm all for backing another crowd sourcing, as long as the features are attainable within X amount of time and there's a list of said features before hand. I like some of the ideas put forth before me. +1 On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > You'll have to fight with the "

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

You'll have to fight with the "why isn't everything in a single window" crowd. But anyway, I asked for a detachable variable watcher a long time ago. I think I may have put in a feature request for it but I may have just talked to someone about it. It was a long time ago. On 2/28/14, 3:53 PM,

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

+1 from me on that one. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: > here's another one: when debugging, how about putti

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

here's another one: when debugging, how about putting variables in a separate window so they aren't competing for scarce vertical space with the script? On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > GLX2 used to do this if I recall, and so did Remo. I wonder if the code is > still ther

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

GLX2 used to do this if I recall, and so did Remo. I wonder if the code is still there somewhere? Bob On Feb 16, 2014, at 13:38 , Richmond wrote: > On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: >> I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how >> about split screen (hori

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Thanks for that Jacque. I knew about the prefs setting but not moving a tab into another window. My split pane suggestion was to see separate parts of the same script, one above the other. With that, right clicking on a handler name and going to its definition would show both the original handl

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

And as per previous, I'd like to be able to have two columns for reading scripts (like pages of a book) for these extra-wide monitors. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:31 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 2/16/14, 3:38 PM, Richmond wrote: > >> On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: >> >>> I'd vote for th

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 2/16/14, 3:38 PM, Richmond wrote: On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. It would be very useful if one could see two scripts, e

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 16/02/14 23:17, Peter Haworth wrote: I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. It would be very useful if one could see two scripts, either side-by-side or above each othe

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'd vote for that one. And while we're talking Script editor changes, how about split screen (horizontally) display and perhaps the ability to move tabs around. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Another: When I'm in a script, and I select a handler/function and pick "Go To Definition", I'd like to be able to have a "go back", like in a browser, that takes me back to where I was in the script I just left. If the code is in a different script it's not a big deal, because a different tab ope

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > > > The only downside with that visualization is that it takes a large screen to really see what's going on. Might be nice to also have some other automated graphic view - what else is floating around in the Git world for that? > Thanks Ri

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Trevor DeVore wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Kevin Miller wrote: Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A long time with heads down and only internal dps so far. But in terms of actual throughput its been massive. The other goal

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Kay C Lan wrote: It's too late to start now, but I'm sure it would make for an interesting info-graphic, one that continually recorded and then displayed the man hours and Kickstarter £ spent on the various 'areas' that the Runrev team is focusing on as they move LC forward. I'm sure refactor and

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Kevin I'm not sure how far you are internally with your Agile / FOSS processes, but wouldn't it be a good idea to share more data regarding the work actually being done? On 10 February 2014 16:19, Kevin Miller wrote: > Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A >

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

=== > "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." > (La Rochefoucauld) > > > On Mon, 2/10/14, Tim Selander wrote: > > Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements > To: "How to use Live

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

l. > > = > Quartam Reports & PDF Library for LiveCode > www.quartam.com > > = > "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time."  (La Rochefoucauld) > > > On Mon,

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Miller wrote: > > We're deep into planning for the next phase at the moment. So I'll write > you guys a more extensive post and/or a newsletter article with an update > on things within the next couple of weeks. > > I always get a kick out of the fact that

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote: > It is fun to see what the team is working on and follow along with features > you are interested in. > A-V - player progress! Yes! *--* *Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words* _

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Kevin Miller wrote: > > Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A >> long time with heads down and only internal dps so far. But in terms of >> actual throughput its been massive. The other goals aren't of th

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

PDF Library for LiveCode >> www.quartam.com >> >> = >> "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." >> (La Rochefoucauld) >> >> >> On Mon, 2/10/14, Tim Selander wrote: >

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

im Selander wrote: Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements To: "How to use LiveCode" Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 7:14 AM I'm originally from Chicago... so in the tradition of that great city, I'm stuffing the virtual ballot box with votes for this one!! Ti

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

on and experimentation outside of the project development environment. Maybe that could be possible in On-Rev.com? Brian Duck The DuckWorks bd...@duckworks.biz Begin forwarded message: > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:20:24 -0700 > From: Vaughn Clement > To: How to use Live

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Kevin Miller wrote: Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A long time with heads down and only internal dps so far. But in terms of actual throughput its been massive. The other goals aren’t of the same scope and as such aren’t as far away as it may seem. That

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hi Folks I haven't read this whole thread so please excuse me if I'm duplicating someone else's ideas. My suggestion would be for RunRev or an interested third party to setup a crowd funding site that allowed people to flesh out specs for changes and then offer funding for them. So the funding

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On 10/02/14 23:34, Trevor DeVore wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ender Nafi Elekcioglu < endern...@keehuna.com> wrote: On February 10, 2014 at 17:56:39, Andrew Kluthe (and...@ctech.me) wrote: Any kind of timelines or updates on any of the stretch goals other than theming/res indepen

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ender Nafi Elekcioglu < endern...@keehuna.com> wrote: > > On February 10, 2014 at 17:56:39, Andrew Kluthe (and...@ctech.me) wrote: > > Any kind of timelines or updates on any of the stretch goals other than > theming/res > independence would be great. ... it is a

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

The things I'm thinking of are generally not on the road map, which is how this thing got started in the first place. Some of them are on a wishlist that I gave to Kevin after our Pro meeting. I also don't want to unnecessarily fork LC just to get what I want (e.g. all items are created equal).

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On February 10, 2014 at 17:24:35, Kevin Miller (ke...@runrev.com) wrote: The only thing we could do would be to speed things up by  further expanding our dev team, which could bring delivery forward for  ³pet² features. I guess we could crowd fund that.  So - here is an open question I don¹t know

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Andrew Kluthe wrote: > Any kind of > timelines or updates on any of the stretch goals other than theming/res > independence would be great. While I understand that is probably the > hardest stretch goal you have had to deliver, it is also the least > important t

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

, Tim Selander wrote: Subject: Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements To: "How to use LiveCode" Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 7:14 AM I'm originally from Chicago... so in the tradition of that great city, I'm stuffing the virtual ballot box with votes for this one!! Tim Selan

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Actually its the core refactor / Unicode that was the really tough bit. A long time with heads down and only internal dps so far. But in terms of actual throughput its been massive. The other goals aren’t of the same scope and as such aren’t as far away as it may seem. We’re deep into planning for

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Since we all work on software too, some of us professionally, we understand it takes a while sometimes to deliver on a road map. I also understand that many kickstarter projects might add stretch goals that are indeed a bit of a stretch to deliver on to try and build/keep excitement. But progress

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

We¹re definitely interested. The potential issue I have is that this stuff was (mostly) promised from Kickstarter and indeed either planned and specced or even being worked on. Mostly it will be delivered this year at various points. You guys already backed us on Kickstarter and we can & will be de

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

Hi Awhile back I proposed a (How to) to offer a LC Codebook for all users to use online to manage their scripts and several other types of LC content. I only got a minimal interest. I am still learning LiveCode like so many other developers. I found the LiveCode has a rather good Dictionary if yo

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

I'm originally from Chicago... so in the tradition of that great city, I'm stuffing the virtual ballot box with votes for this one!! Tim Selander Tokyo, Japan On 2/11/14 12:02 AM, Mike Kerner wrote: * A real report editor/designer ___ use-livecode

Re: Crowd Funding Enhancements

> > 1) Feature: reworked networking library (libURL is a bit dated), which > would elevate IPv6 support and goodies like SFTP and * A real report editor/designer Seem like really feasible projects, and would change the game for just about every thing I do with livecode. I'd sell a piece of my

Crowd Funding Enhancements

I started this thread on the other list, but it's time to bring it over here. Now that LC is OSS, I'm thinking of starting a "fund" to get other things done in LC. For example, * code folding * stack-level setting for giving equal rights to all items, especially the last one * macros in the scrip