Thank you!
Yes I do have some things in mind.
As I have said in other post I know
a little bit about c++ and objective-c
so I am not completely up to par on
using pointers and c etc. I will need
to go review lessons and code to even
correctly write the pointer but I have
used them in learning and
On 2015-08-18 23:39, JB wrote:
That looks really nice!
They have put a lot of work into it.
It sounds like you cannot use any
pointers yet or access everything in
Foundation.
You can use pointers -- but you can't dereference them.
You can use pretty much everything in libfoundation, but not e
That looks really nice!
They have put a lot of work into it.
It sounds like you cannot use any
pointers yet or access everything in
Foundation.
John Balgenorth
On Aug 18, 2015, at 5:43 AM, John Dixon wrote:
>
>
>> From: rolf.kocherh...@id.uzh.ch
>
>> Second question:
>>
>> The new Widgets
On 2015-08-18 14:57, Roger Eller wrote:
I recommend working through the step-by-step guide that Georgia wrote:
https://livecode.com/write-a-widget-in-8-steps/
It's quite easy to follow and it's a great intro to LiveCode Builder.
That is a great intro, but where are the details of the language
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Peter TB Brett
wrote:
> On 2015-08-18 11:17, Rolf Kocherhans wrote:
>
> The new Widgets and the new LiveCode Builder language, when and how do
>> we get more
>> information about how to use the Language ?
>>
>> I had a look at all the movies and blog posts, but to
On 2015-08-18 11:17, Rolf Kocherhans wrote:
The new Widgets and the new LiveCode Builder language, when and how do
we get more
information about how to use the Language ?
I had a look at all the movies and blog posts, but to be honest, for
me the present info is not
at all enough to feel confid
> From: rolf.kocherh...@id.uzh.ch
> Second question:
>
> The new Widgets and the new LiveCode Builder language, when and how do we get
> more
> information about how to use the Language ?
>
> I had a look at all the movies and blog posts, but to be honest, for me the
> present info is not
>
I didn’t wanna chime in into all those discussions, but I am totally confused by
the LiveCode mothership recently, and I have to now.
I am confused with the new BAF License and all the talk about SVN.
It is very clear to me that SVN does make a lot of sense to everyone. Therefore
I programmed a
On 26/10/14 20:06, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Friday, October 24, 2014, 2:36:16 AM, you wrote:
I've just installed 6.7 on linux and the about window does, indeed,
display the Livecode 7 details . . . something not quite right.
Confirmed here. Not a show-stopper, but weird. Maybe a result of
Richmond-
Friday, October 24, 2014, 2:36:16 AM, you wrote:
> I've just installed 6.7 on linux and the about window does, indeed,
> display the Livecode 7 details . . . something not quite right.
Confirmed here. Not a show-stopper, but weird. Maybe a result of
merging the develop and refactor bra
hrust upon
them." - William Shakespeare & Hugh Senior
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Confused-tp4684847p4684854.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-
I've just installed 6.7 on linux and the about window does, indeed,
display the Livecode 7 details . . . something not quite right.
Richmond.
On 10/24/2014 11:12 AM, Terence Heaford wrote:
Here’s mine.
This image may not show but it is the LIVECODE7 Logo
All the best
Terry
On 24 Oct
Here’s mine.
This image may not show but it is the LIVECODE7 Logo
All the best
Terry
> On 24 Oct 2014, at 08:18, Dave Kilroy wrote:
>
> The 'About' box for 6.7 gives me "6.7" (build 5012), and for 7 it displays
> "7.0.0" (build 10018)
___
use-
ssage in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Confused-tp4684847p4684849.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscri
Why does the about box for LC 6.7 say LC7?
All the best
Terry
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/li
Yes I was actually thinking about and had begun to make each card/form it's own
stack, but when I got to the place of thinking about all the variables and code
and message paths I had already set up and was deeply entrenched in, the hassle
of making it all work non-modally so to speak seemed too
Probably what will work is to make a stackrunner type of splash stack with
any libraries etc included. Then you can have your real stack with its
substacks be opened by the splash. As long as the right support stuff is
included the splash you can "go stack.." and it should be fine, and the
splashs
Correction. You cannot go to a card in a new window. The command will ignore
the new window and just go to the card in the existing window. That would be a
nice feature enhancement for having multiple windows open on a single stack.
Bob
> Thanks Devin I think I understand now. I am going to a
this it what you were asking.
>
> Devin
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I am a bit confused now. I created a new stack, saved it, made it a substack
>> of my splash stack. No problemo. I can see the substack on the
;
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I am a bit confused now. I created a new stack, saved it, made it a
>> substack of my splash stack. No problemo. I can see the substack on the
>> hard drive, I can see the substack
tacks into
individual stack files."
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am a bit confused now. I created a new stack, saved it, made it a
> substack of my splash stack. No problemo. I can see the substack on the
> hard drive, I can see the su
.
Bottom line: substacks are part of the same stack file of the mainstack.
Hope this it what you were asking.
Devin
On Nov 18, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am a bit confused now. I created a new stack, saved it, made it a substack
> of my splash stack.
Hi all.
I am a bit confused now. I created a new stack, saved it, made it a substack of
my splash stack. No problemo. I can see the substack on the hard drive, I can
see the substack in the application browser as a substack of my splash stack.
BUT THEN...
I right clicked my splash stack in
On 10/25/11 6:10 PM, Warren Samples wrote:
I don't get
any messages regarding an update when I open 5.0 under Linux. (I am a
member of the Developer Program as a result of the prior licensing
model.) I wonder if this is a bug.
I'm wondering the same thing, because 5.0 has just reintroduced
aut
Tim, don't worry about it. I am sure maintenance upgrades are included in your
agreement, and until they come out with one for non-developers, you can just
ignore that dialog. I think it is probably a mistake and you were never
intended to see it.
If you want to know what the latest version yo
On 10/25/2011 05:44 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:
She seemed to suggest that the upgrade to 5.0.1 is for developers only, but
that doesn't sound right.
Please advise.
Tim Miller
Any upgrades you are entitled to will be available from the Store at
runrev.com. Select that link and sign in. 5.0 s
I keep getting this message, too. I don't know what to think. I never
subscribed to the developers' program. Don't know what it is. (Well... I think
it's some kind of a program for developers, but that's just a guess.)
I am a registered owner of 5.0 for the Mac desktop. That's all I need or want
Yeah that threw me too, but since I have a license that goes into 2014, I
realized it was a faux pas. I never click the Buy button if I already bought
something.
Bob
On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Admin wrote:
>
>
> Here we go.
>
> It seems Runrev wants more of my money.
>
> I upgraded
>
Your timetable may be a little out. 4.6 was out near the end of March, 4.6.1
in May, 4.6.2 in June, 4.6.3 in July, 4.6.4 in September, and 5.0 in October.
Each of those had several test builds that you could have access to if you had
one of the more costly deals with LiveCode, and if you're u
Here we go.
It seems Runrev wants more of my money.
I upgraded
to 5.0 and they offered me a very good deal, so I took it.
However,
now (1 day later) I get a message (from some kind of small app loaded
into my startup) saying that my version of LiveCode 5.0 is obsolete (it
literally said t
; bit
> >>>> fussy about the data definition and the supported size.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan Schenkel.
> >>>> =
> >>>> Quartam Reports & PDF Library for LiveCode
> >>>> www.quartam.com
> >>>
l.
>>>> =
>>>> Quartam Reports & PDF Library for LiveCode
>>>> www.quartam.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =
>>>> "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same
>> time."
>> Jan Schenkel.
> >> =
> >> Quartam Reports & PDF Library for LiveCode
> >> www.quartam.com
> >>
> >>
> >> =
> >> "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same
> time."
> >&
row both wiser and more foolish at the same time."
>> (La Rochefoucauld)
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Pete
>> To: How to use LiveCode
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: Confused about
for LiveCode
> www.quartam.com
>
>
> =
> "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time."
> (La Rochefoucauld)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Pete
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August
2, 2011 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Confused about storing arrays in a custom property
Hi Jan,
The base64Encode worked great, thanks for the tip! I didn't need to store
it as a CLOB type actually, just as regular text.
Pete
Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
___
.com
>
>
> =
> "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time."
> (La Rochefoucauld)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Pete
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re:
ser and more foolish at the same time."
> (La Rochefoucauld)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Pete
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Confused about storing arrays in a custom property
>
> I do s
=
"As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." (La
Rochefoucauld)
- Original Message -
From: Pete
To: How to use LiveCode
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: Confused about storing arrays in a custom property
I do store i
, the resulting line would be "abcdefxyz". This
> was
> > the cause of my other recent posts about what happens when the last item
> in
> > a string is empty. Provided some interesting recursion opportunities!
> >
> > Pete
> > Molly's Revenge &
> the cause of my other recent posts about what happens when the last item in
> a string is empty. Provided some interesting recursion opportunities!
>
> Pete
> Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:49 AM, A
en the last item in
a string is empty. Provided some interesting recursion opportunities!
Pete
Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Kluthe wrote:
> It sounds to me like binary is the data type you want here.
>
> --
> View
It sounds to me like binary is the data type you want here.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Confused-about-storing-arrays-in-a-custom-property-tp3757539p3760664.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I wonder if you shouldn't be using binary?
Bob
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Pete wrote:
> Thanks Richard, writing to a file (an sqlite database actually) is exactly
> what I want to do.
>
> However, I'm running into a problem with this. I believe I have written the
> data correctly to the da
[mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Pete
Sent: Sunday, 21 August 2011 5:46 AM
To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Confused about storing arrays in a custom property
I read in the LC manual that it isn;t possible to store an array in a single
custom property, yet I have done that
Thanks Richard, writing to a file (an sqlite database actually) is exactly
what I want to do.
However, I'm running into a problem with this. I believe I have written the
data correctly to the database as a BLOB column, but when I read it back
from the database and use arraydecode to make it into
Pete wrote:
Next issue is using combine and split with multidimensional arrays. It
seems like they only work for a single dimension array. I guess to use them
with multidimensional arrays, you have to apply them to each level of array
key? Maybe a recursive function of some sort?
Split and c
Great, thanks.
Next issue is using combine and split with multidimensional arrays. It
seems like they only work for a single dimension array. I guess to use them
with multidimensional arrays, you have to apply them to each level of array
key? Maybe a recursive function of some sort?
Pete
Molly'
Hi Pete,
This part of the documentation is probably from the time before
multidimensional arrays. When multidimensional arrays were introduced, we also
got a way to store them as custom properties. Don't worry.
--
Kind regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk
Http://economy-x-talk.com
Share t
I read in the LC manual that it isn;t possible to store an array in a single
custom property, yet I have done that and it seems to work fine. The
Inspector doesn't show the value, just a greyed out message about it being
an array.
Before I go any further down that path, is this a safe thing to do
50 matches
Mail list logo
