hope
it turns out a fruity conserve but there is NO excuse for the new Sqlite
framework not getting done at all. I won't even mention the HTML
which is charged as the same as Indy and is still not ready for prime time
(if I read between the lines of Hermann's posts).
Box2D was in testing o
Now Software, a stellar company in it's day, made promises it couldn't keep,
and when they tried to keep them anyway, they went belly up because of lack of
funds. That was a dark day for me because I had the whole organization running
on the public calendar and contacts.
Bob S
> On Jun 9, 20
That is not the point , it seems that they are adding other stuff before
implementing what was paid for
the new sqlite api/framework for instance.
People keep on asking about sound and there is zilch.
just cos nobody is asking about box2d doesn't mean it's not wanted -what
are the chan
he
> market of users, or you become useless.
>
> I don't see a lot of people asking for 2d physics.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:35 AM Richmond via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
>> Box2D
>>
ing a platform is challenging because you have to respond to the
market of users, or you become useless.
I don't see a lot of people asking for 2d physics.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:35 AM Richmond via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Box2D
>
>
>
Box2D
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts/415346
Promises
Fundraisers
Trust
Physics Engine
Babble, babble, babble . . .
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
ll,
>
> On the forum, ClipArtGuy wrote:
>> FWIW, the Box2D Physics Engine goal
>> was also met and has also been dropped
>> from the roadmap.
>
> http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=28290&p=148671#p14831
Hi All,
On the forum, ClipArtGuy wrote:
> FWIW, the Box2D Physics Engine goal
> was also met and has also been dropped
> from the roadmap.
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=28290&p=148671#p148314
Which LiveCode version in
Box2d is definitely fun to play with but it's really only good for games that
inherently need physics simulation - Angry Birds is a good example. (BTW, box2d
is also the physics engine in Sprite Kit, which is basically Apple's cocos2d
Lite - since the cocos2d developers started focuss
(Use the arrow keys (or A,W,S,D) to control the buggy and the return key
to switch camera angle)
On 21/08/2013 12:26, John Craig wrote:
I'm also interested in creating games with LiveCode and looking
forward to box2d integration. I've been checking out Corona and (more
recently) -
I'm also interested in creating games with LiveCode and looking forward
to box2d integration. I've been checking out Corona and (more recently)
- Unity (3D), to familiarize myself with physics stuff. It makes a
massive difference having a physics engine taking care of collisions
"Even in the article you linked, the author had to give up the convenience of
Objective-C and drop down to C++ to get that level of optimization."
Touché :-)
Btw, I'll give a shot to QT Creator; it looks interesting.
And I definitely, definitely have to learn writing externals.
Thank you Mark…
I wrote an extensive response to your original mail on this thread but sadly
lost it to rubbish Yahoo! webmail + the 15k limit on the list. (FWIW,
JavaScript is not 50 times slower than C++ but with modern JS engines like
Google's v8 more like 5 times + that amazing Citadel demo with the unreal
Yes, I'm aware of Box2D integration and I'm very excited about it.
I can't wait to see the possibilities.
But, I'm not sure how much performance boost it will give us.
I've stumbled on an article tonight about algorithm optimizations.
It's kind of a case study.
*
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Richmond wrote:
> To illustrate this consider a possible future scenario:
>
> 2030:
>
> Desktop computers are largely a thing of the past.
>
> A large array of handheld devices run on successor systems to Android,
> Linux and Mobile versions of
> Mac and Windows, a
Ender-
Tuesday, August 20, 2013, 1:11:12 AM, you wrote:
> Still, I wish to see a really cool game or an app with
> mind-blowing effects done via LiveCode.
> It would be a great showcase, don't you think?
You *are* aware that a new physics engine is one of the Kickstarter
stretch goals, right? It
Lynn Fredricks: "This is something that they should stay away from. … An
investment that cannot work on all supported platforms and not leverage
the natural productivity of LiveCode isn't a good investment for Runtime."
Well put, indeed.
I'm quite convinced about this.
Taking a platform-specific
On 08/18/2013 01:18 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
An investment that cannot work on all supported platforms and not
leverage the natural productivity of LiveCode isn't a good investment
for Runtime.
Very well put.
There is a danger of getting distracted by these sorts of things.
I don't know
eek animations.
> It probably will do a lot of damage to Cocos2D, Box2D,
> Sparrow and in time maybe a possible threat to gaming
> consoles {see link #1 at the bottom of the post}.
>
> What do you think RunRev's approach will be to this move?
> Are we going to continue wit
fects and sleek animations.
It probably will do a lot of damage to Cocos2D, Box2D, Sparrow
and in time maybe a possible threat to gaming consoles {see link #1 at the
bottom of the post}.
What do you think RunRev's approach will be to this move?
Are we going to continue with Box2D which i
20 matches
Mail list logo
