On 09/04/2012 08:08 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 9/4/12 11:39 AM, Richmond wrote:
On 09/04/2012 06:38 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 9/4/12 1:29 AM, Richmond wrote:
I really wonder if anyone can clarify the situations re both 'old' and
'new' RevOnlines?
And, if they have been hosed completely,
On 9/4/12 11:39 AM, Richmond wrote:
On 09/04/2012 06:38 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 9/4/12 1:29 AM, Richmond wrote:
I really wonder if anyone can clarify the situations re both 'old' and
'new' RevOnlines?
And, if they have been hosed completely, whether there is a repository
somewhere of all
On 09/04/2012 06:38 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 9/4/12 1:29 AM, Richmond wrote:
I really wonder if anyone can clarify the situations re both 'old' and
'new' RevOnlines?
And, if they have been hosed completely, whether there is a repository
somewhere of all the
wonderful stacks they once contai
On 9/4/12 1:29 AM, Richmond wrote:
I really wonder if anyone can clarify the situations re both 'old' and
'new' RevOnlines?
And, if they have been hosed completely, whether there is a repository
somewhere of all the
wonderful stacks they once contained?
The "new" RevOnline is working fine now.
I really wonder if anyone can clarify the situations re both 'old' and
'new' RevOnlines?
And, if they have been hosed completely, whether there is a repository
somewhere of all the
wonderful stacks they once contained?
Richmond.
___
use-livecode ma
