Re: Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 3/4/11 2:18 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote: If I have this in a button script: on mouseUp checkBack end mouseUp and this in a stack script: on checkBack put "" wait 20 put random(99) end checkBack and then insert that stack script into back, I still only get > one random number.

Re: Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 3/4/11 8:51 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: Somebody preserve my sanity here... Sorry, you've been talking to associating with all of us here for too long... there is now no way to preserve sanity :-) I'm afraid you may be right... I've b

Re: Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread Sarah Reichelt
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Somebody preserve my sanity here... Sorry, you've been talking to associating with all of us here for too long... there is now no way to preserve sanity :-) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-live

Re: Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread Bob Sneidar
get two? > > > And by the way, answers are what we expect from you, not questions. > > > Craig > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: J. Landman Gay > To: LiveCode Mailing List > Sent: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 3:04 pm > Subject: Backscript

Re: Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread dunbarx
eant, that you might get two? And by the way, answers are what we expect from you, not questions. Craig -Original Message- From: J. Landman Gay To: LiveCode Mailing List Sent: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 3:04 pm Subject: Backscript behavior Somebody preserve my sanity here...if a stack

Backscript behavior

2011-03-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
Somebody preserve my sanity here...if a stack script is inserted into the back, and you happen to be working in that stack, are called handlers executed twice? I'm getting some weird results. The message watcher says they aren't, and lists only one call for each handler. But the debugger steps