Especially Clairvoyance. You want a way to not make typos in your code?
Clairvoyance baby!
Bob S
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 07:34 , Roger Eller wrote:
>
> I agree. In fact, I like the built-in SE, but to have some of the glx2
> features in the flagship product would be awesome. It can't be too
>
This also happened to me. Sorry for not reporting it. Since I am working on a
"live" project, I just removed GLX2 and went back to using the built in script
editor. I'll give the latest update another try.
Bob S
On Sep 23, 2016, at 17:44 , Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
mailto:bra...@hindu.org>>
I updated the readme file on bitbucket, so there's at least that level of
documentation online.
-
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708969.html
Sent
Indeed. I think that would be an excellent place to start.
-
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708948.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list
Sorry, I get all the threads jumbled. I had previously proposed a session
with Edinburgh to review the inyards of the IDE and the SE to make it
easier for more of us to get involved in working on it. This is a good
example of why that might be a good idea.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Richar
Mike Kerner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> For these reasons it may be helpful to consider a path forward
>> like the one Bernd chose: pick one feature, work with the core
>> team to implement it, and submit that pull request, then move
>> on to the next feat
It would be easier to answer the question after the session...
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Mike Kerner wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/24/2016 06:17 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
> >>
> >>> So what would it take to get a bunc
Mike Kerner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>> On 09/24/2016 06:17 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
>>
>>> So what would it take to get a bunch of glx2's features rolled into
>>> the SE so we have one SE instead of two? Theming, folding,
>>> breadcrumbs, folders, revisions a
The problem is that without understanding it, we're going to be at a
distinct time disadvantage. I just went through that trying to fix a
couple of things in the documentation rendering, this week. I spent a lot
of hours having to learn how it worked, because nobody else knew.
On Sat, Sep 24, 20
On 09/24/2016 06:17 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
So what would it take to get a bunch of glx2's features rolled into the SE
so we have one SE instead of two? Theming, folding, breadcrumbs, folders,
revisions all are things that would be good to add to the SE, and it would
make it more compelling to ha
exactly
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Roger Eller
wrote:
> I agree. In fact, I like the built-in SE, but to have some of the glx2
> features in the flagship product would be awesome. It can't be too
> paradigm-altering, but to allow optional features to to user-controlled in
> the preferen
I agree. In fact, I like the built-in SE, but to have some of the glx2
features in the flagship product would be awesome. It can't be too
paradigm-altering, but to allow optional features to to user-controlled in
the preferences would be value added for sure.
~Roger
On Sep 24, 2016 9:18 AM, "Mi
So what would it take to get a bunch of glx2's features rolled into the SE
so we have one SE instead of two? Theming, folding, breadcrumbs, folders,
revisions all are things that would be good to add to the SE, and it would
make it more compelling to have a single SE project.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016
On 09/23/2016 05:44 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
I close the tab in LC SE…save the stack… click on the GLX2 to switch to
GLX for editing.
Ah. I see what you did there.
From the "known issues" section of the release notes:
"Swapping back and forth between glx2 and the IDE's script edi
On 09/23/2016 10:20 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
I don't need it, but when you hit it, the GLX2 prefs window opens and then
immediately closes. It's the sequence that LC uses to open prefs, and I
think it's sort-of standard on macs. If you disable it, I don't think
anyone would complain, but check th
My guess would be that glx2 filters handlers starting with rev, as in the
case of reviewSelections. Just a guess though since I don't have glx2 set
up at the moment.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami <
bra...@hindu.org> wrote:
> Mark: Really
> curious about what's
Mark: Really
curious about what's going on with your system that's interfering with this
process.
...and no, the note about code folding is old and I should probably put it
to bed now.
BR: well I would be happy to screen share some time with Team Viewer (it's
free) email
I managed to turn up the current macOS HIG recommendation for Cmd-comma,
which suggest using it to open Preferences:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201236
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
__
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708862.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
05.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708860.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubsc
Mark Wieder wrote:
OK - admittedly I never thought about command-comma. That's a bizarre key
sequence. I'll add it to the next build if you really need it.
I have a vague recollection of Cmd-, being an established shortcut for
shifting focus to palettes, specifically those serving a sort of
I
Mark Wieder" wrote:
So far seems fine on El Capitan. You *do* have a way of pushing the
limits of things, though, so I await your experiences.
BR: seems I spoke too soon. Now I'm experiencing the exact same issue I had
years ago: compiled scripts are not actually saved into th
Mark Wieder" wrote:
So far seems fine on El Capitan. You *do* have a way of pushing the limits
of things, though, so I await your experiences.
BR:
OK, so far so good in a fairly complex environment where we load a lot of
binary LC stacks in front and also backscripts and behavior… so far n
erly.
> Seems to work and then unwork. Can you report these things as issues on
> bitbucket so that I can track them properly? Thanks.
>
>
>
> -
> --
> Mark Wieder
> ahsoftw...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.
> 2
> Mark Wieder
> ahsoftw...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.
> 278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-
> line-tp4708283p4708845.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
ly? Thanks.
-
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708847.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at
OK - admittedly I never thought about command-comma. That's a bizarre key
sequence. I'll add it to the next build if you really need it.
-
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-
ok, next thing:
italicizing comments for font SourceCodePro doesn't seem to happen (but it
does for InputMonoLight).
Bolding folder names don't seem to work, but I can't tell which direction
it doesn't work. Folder names look bold, but hitting the checkbox and then
unchecking doesn't do anything,
yep. and I just found out something interesting that I probably should
have mentioned: how you bring up the prefs matters. I was trying to
command-comma it. If I just try to bring it up from the File menu, it
seems to stick.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 09/22/2016
On 09/22/2016 12:09 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
It doesn't appear to be hiding. I thought that, too. It also doesn't
appear in the list of windows, but I haven't checked the PB to see if it's
just misbehaving in multiple ways. And we're talking about OSX el cap or
whatever 11 is
Interesting. Did
-
> Mark Wieder
> ahsoftw...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.2783
> 05.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-
> tp4708283p4708789.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708789.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
that doesn't seem to fix it for me.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Mark Talluto
wrote:
>
> > On Sep 22, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Mike Kerner
> wrote:
> >
> > 2) I'm trying to edit the prefs for GLX2, but the prefs window only
> flashes
> > and disappears, again.
>
> I noticed that too. I found a wor
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
>
> 2) I'm trying to edit the prefs for GLX2, but the prefs window only flashes
> and disappears, again.
I noticed that too. I found a workaround.
1. Edit some code in GLX2.
2. Go to LiveCode/preferences
This will bring up the GLX2 preferences
A couple of things:
1) The Everything under "blogroll" on the wordpress site points to
wordpress things, not Marky things
2) I'm trying to edit the prefs for GLX2, but the prefs window only flashes
and disappears, again.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 09/21/2016 12:10
On 09/21/2016 12:10 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
I'll give it a go again.. thanks Mark! I see you uploaded a version 3 hours
ago…
Yeah... I finally had time to clear out some longstanding bugs, so I put
a 3.0.20 build online.
cross fingers for compatilibity on 8.1 OS X
So far se
I got GLX from Jerry "eons" ago, but had challenges…
I'll give it a go again.. thanks Mark! I see you uploaded a version 3 hours
ago… cross fingers for compatilibity on 8.1 OS X
where are the docs?
BR
On 9/20/16, 12:37 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Bob Sneidar"
wrote:
On Sep 10
..@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-new-glx2-script-editor-now-on-line-tp4708283p4708707.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode maili
False alarm. I was misremembering that GLX2 had clairvoyance for variable
names, but that was a feature of another script editor now long defunct.
Bob S
On Sep 20, 2016, at 15:37 , Bob Sneidar
mailto:bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com>> wrote:
Clairvoyance no workie... I can have a look and see if I
Clairvoyance no workie... I can have a look and see if I can tell what is going
wrong.
Bob S
On Sep 10, 2016, at 19:34 , ahsoftware
mailto:ahsoftw...@sonic.net>> wrote:
Zombie alert: the dead glx2 script editor has come back to life.
>From the release notes:
2016.09.10 GLX2 3.0.19
My beloved GLX2! I thought I had lost you!!! ;-)
Bob S
On Sep 10, 2016, at 19:34 , ahsoftware
mailto:ahsoftw...@sonic.net>> wrote:
Zombie alert: the dead glx2 script editor has come back to life.
>From the release notes:
2016.09.10 GLX2 3.0.19
___
Zombie alert: the dead glx2 script editor has come back to life.
From the release notes:
2016.09.10 GLX2 3.0.19
Fraser Gordon and I sat down for half an hour at the LiveCode 16
conference in Edinburgh and figured out what was causing the problem
with taking up the CPU cycles. The engine pro
42 matches
Mail list logo
