does everyone make it so difficult to get admin privileges? ;)
>
> Regards,
> Fraser
>
>
> Further "entertainment":
>
> I successfully installed the 7.0.0 DP 5 'second attempt' with the "All Users"
> option.
>
> When I launched
does everyone make it so difficult to get admin privileges? ;)
Regards,
Fraser
Further "entertainment":
I successfully installed the 7.0.0 DP 5 'second attempt' with the "All Users"
option.
When I launched it [Livecode 7.0.0 dp 5] it
At Richard's suggestion, I've submitted an enhancement request for this.
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12558
On 28 May 2014, at 15:40, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Phil Jimmieson wrote:
>
>> Currently, if you save a stack with version 7 of LiveCode and try and open
>> it with version 6
[ possibly
because I'm quite
good and being seamy against-the-grain, LOL ].
But, just now, when I decided to install 7.0.0 dp 5, I clicked on "All
Users", was asked
for my password, and everything installed 'seamlessly', insofar as that
was all I has to
do and Liveco
Fraser Gordon wrote:
> All LiveCode does during the install is to re-launch itself using
> gksu:
>
> gksu --preserve-env /path/to/installer.x86 $MAGIC_INSTALLER_OPTIONS
>
> The installer relies on the gksu programme to do the authentication
> and authorisation magic; it can't really influence how
lacement so things stopped
working.
Why does everyone make it so difficult to get admin privileges? ;)
Regards,
Fraser
Further "entertainment":
I successfully installed the 7.0.0 DP 5 'second attempt' with the "All
Users" option.
When I launched it [Livecode 7.0.
Exactly what happened to me, but I've never seen it. That's what makes me
think there's a difference between the commercial and community notifications.
On May 28, 2014 8:54:10 AM CDT, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
>
>I had a client recently refer to a "stable" build of 7.0, but
>everything
>I can
The file format has changed, so stacks saved in 7.0 can't be opened again in
previous versions. Is that what happened?
This is the second time I've heard someone say that 7.0 was stable. I thought
we were still at dp. I wonder if the community edition is reporting incorrectly
in the updater
On 28 May 2014, at 15:01, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> The "You Only" requirement when installing under a non-admin account seems an
> unnecessary drag. When I install any .deb file I'm prompted to enter an
> admin password, but the LC installer only prompts for the current account and
> requir
Phil Jimmieson wrote:
Currently, if you save a stack with version 7 of LiveCode and try and open it
with version 6.6.1 (for example) you get the message:
"Unable to open stack: Stack is corrupted, check for ~ backup file."
Could Rev not get LiveCode to read the version number off the stack wh
I'd be willing to bet it wasn't a corrupted stack, merely the result of
the scary message you get when LC tries to load a stack saved with a
later version - e.g. if it is saved with 7.0 and later you try to load
it with 6.6
-- Alex.
On 28/05/2014 14:54, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Paul Foraker wro
Currently, if you save a stack with version 7 of LiveCode and try and open it
with version 6.6.1 (for example) you get the message:
"Unable to open stack: Stack is corrupted, check for ~ backup file."
Could Rev not get LiveCode to read the version number off the stack when it
tried to open it a
Richmond wrote:
On 27/05/14 12:06, Fraser Gordon wrote:
Hi all,
There have been a number of problems reported with the Linux builds of LiveCode
7.0.0-DP-5. As far as I've been able to tell, these were due to a build problem
that resulted in DP4 being re-packaged as DP5. I've now re
Paul Foraker wrote:
When I opened a couple of large stacks I use every day in the "stable"
version of 7.0 CE, both stacks got corrupted on the first save. This
happened twice in a row, so I've now gone back to 6.5.2.
I had a client recently refer to a "stable" build of 7.0, but everything
I ca
On 27/05/14 12:06, Fraser Gordon wrote:
Hi all,
There have been a number of problems reported with the Linux builds of LiveCode
7.0.0-DP-5. As far as I've been able to tell, these were due to a build problem
that resulted in DP4 being re-packaged as DP5. I've now re-built and
re-up
When I opened a couple of large stacks I use every day in the "stable"
version of 7.0 CE, both stacks got corrupted on the first save. This
happened twice in a row, so I've now gone back to 6.5.2.
-- Paul
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.
On 27/05/14 23:43, Mike Kerner wrote:
Or you're that other personality of his that keeps logging in and
commenting on different threads...
None of my personalities are responsible for any comments made by any of
the other personalities.
Notwithstanding, at least one of my personalities, like
Or you're that other personality of his that keeps logging in and
commenting on different threads...
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> I suppose this means Richmond and I think alike…
>
> On May 25, 2014, at 10:29 , Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Some of u
I suppose this means Richmond and I think alike…
On May 25, 2014, at 10:29 , Richmond
mailto:richmondmathew...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Some of us are wanting to get deeper into the pool (and I don't mean the brown,
smelly one),
but are waiting on some PPC waterwings . . .
__
Richmond refuses to use the water wings.
Bob S
On May 25, 2014, at 09:52 , Mark Wieder
mailto:mwie...@ahsoftware.net>> wrote:
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 9:26:57 AM, you wrote:
It shows the same build number in the "About" screen. You have to wonder
exactly where the mixup is.
If you're g
Can you give any idea how long for the 64 bit version? If we are talking 6
months or less, I will wait for it, if its more, I'll install the 32 bit
version.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/LiveCode-7-0-0-DP-5-Linux-tp4680016p4680026.html
On 26 May 2014, at 18:12, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Fraser-
>
> Monday, May 26, 2014, 3:55:29 AM, you wrote:
>
>> DP4 and DP5 have been officially released.
>
> Is that you speaking in an official capacity or just noting the fact?
Both DP4 and DP5 were released on Friday the 23rd of May. DP4 was
Hi all,
There have been a number of problems reported with the Linux builds of LiveCode
7.0.0-DP-5. As far as I've been able to tell, these were due to a build problem
that resulted in DP4 being re-packaged as DP5. I've now re-built and
re-uploaded the Linux installers for DP5 to the
Fraser-
Monday, May 26, 2014, 3:55:29 AM, you wrote:
> DP4 and DP5 have been officially released.
Is that you speaking in an official capacity or just noting the fact?
> The downloads web page doesn't show any versions which we haven't
> deliberately made publicly available.
The release notes
On 26/05/2014 08:27, Colin Holgate wrote:
> During Kevin's thing he did tell us all to go try the new build that had just
> been posted. I'm guessing that was dp4. If you do a check for updates now, or
> even just open LiveCode, you’ll see you can install dp5.
DP4 and DP5 have been officially re
During Kevin's thing he did tell us all to go try the new build that had just
been posted. I'm guessing that was dp4. If you do a check for updates now, or
even just open LiveCode, you’ll see you can install dp5.
One slightly confusing thing is that the installer is now just replacing the
chang
On 05/26/2014 12:53 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
That's what I thought. This urban legend has been batted around
lately.
Um, what is it you thought? I didn't say "I once heard somebody say
their friend's uncle told them about a neighbor..." urban legend style.
It was my own (recent) observation. I
I’m coming in late in this and might be putting my foot into my mouth.
I just looked at the download page and I see 7.0 dp4 and 7.0 dp5. I guess they
were part of the LiveCode Jam weekend activities.
Dar
On May 25, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Warren-
>
> Sunday, May 25, 2014,
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 9:05:33 PM, you wrote:
> There was recently a version announced on one list which I did not see
> announced on the other. It struck me as odd. I don't remember which
That's what I thought. This urban legend has been batted around
lately. Time to put it to rest. Here
On 05/25/2014 11:35 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
That's what the "dp" and "rc" designations are for, but it would probably be
more clear if there was a statement on the page explaining what those mean, along with appropriate
caveats. Final releases should be clearly marked as stable.
We're dis
That's what the "dp" and "rc" designations are for, but it would probably be
more clear if there was a statement on the page explaining what those mean,
along with appropriate caveats. Final releases should be clearly marked as
stable.
On May 25, 2014 11:05:33 PM CDT, Warren Samples wrote:
On 05/25/2014 10:20 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 12:31:34 PM, you wrote:
With so many parallel versions and more than one place to track
announcements, it's hard to be sure exactly what is current.
Ah, ok... maybe I missed something here. You're saying there was a
ver
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 12:31:34 PM, you wrote:
> With so many parallel versions and more than one place to track
> announcements, it's hard to be sure exactly what is current.
Ah, ok... maybe I missed something here. You're saying there was a
version that was released but wasn't announced
If you are reading ‘until empty’, try a timeout. The timeout is probably fixed.
On May 25, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Camm wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> Serial Communications seems to be broke in 7.0.0 dp 5 , noticed this was
> listed as bug fix ?
>
>
With write fixed, I’m hoping we can do some loop-back tests. That is easier
for us and easier for creating test stacks to illustrate the bug.
Dar
On May 25, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Camm wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> Serial Communications seems to be broke in 7.0.0 dp 5 , noticed thi
On 05/25/2014 01:58 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
...which was also not announced...
With so many parallel versions and more than one place to track
announcements, it's hard to be sure exactly what is current. The fact
that there is a public link on the LiveCode site to downloads of
versions which
On 25/05/14 21:55, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 10:29:02 AM, you wrote:
Kevin made the release announcement for 7.0.0 dp 5 in his pre Q & A blurb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq2BNghE9yc
so the cat is out of the bag.
Without wanting to spend a Sunday watchin
On 25/05/14 21:16, Fraser Gordon wrote:
On 25/05/2014 16:29, Richmond wrote:
Problems:
1. The menubar (Linux) states it it dp 4.
Mea cupla! As we spent Friday working on bugfixes for the Global Jam, we
wanted to get out a new release of 7 as soon as possible as quite a few
bugs were resolved. U
Fraser-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 11:16:51 AM, you wrote:
> We also intend to supply 64-bit Linux builds in the near future.
I look forward to being able to build those again.
--
-Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National
Security
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 10:56:30 AM, you wrote:
> If we assume this is a mislabeled dp4,
...which was also not announced...
--
-Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National
Security Agency (NSA) in secret. The parties to th
Richmond-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 10:29:02 AM, you wrote:
> Kevin made the release announcement for 7.0.0 dp 5 in his pre Q & A blurb:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq2BNghE9yc
> so the cat is out of the bag.
Without wanting to spend a Sunday watching an hour of Kevin in orde
On 25/05/2014 16:29, Richmond wrote:
> Problems:
> 1. The menubar (Linux) states it it dp 4.
Mea cupla! As we spent Friday working on bugfixes for the Global Jam, we
wanted to get out a new release of 7 as soon as possible as quite a few
bugs were resolved. Unfortunately, coming at the end of the
On 25/05/14 20:56, Warren Samples wrote:
On 05/25/2014 11:52 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
or wait for an actual release announcement.
Mark,
If we assume this is a mislabeled dp4, I suppose it's possible there
are problems resolved in the actual dp5 that we can't experience just
yet, but the issu
Hi ,
Serial Communications seems to be broke in 7.0.0 dp 5 , noticed this was
listed as bug fix ?
Regards
Camm
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
On 05/25/2014 11:52 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
or wait for an actual release announcement.
Mark,
If we assume this is a mislabeled dp4, I suppose it's possible there are
problems resolved in the actual dp5 that we can't experience just yet,
but the issues he's talking about here have plagued hi
or dual boot, Mac OS 10.4.11 and Xubuntu PPC.
Kevin made the release announcement for 7.0.0 dp 5 in his pre Q & A blurb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq2BNghE9yc
so the cat is out of the bag.
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode
Warren-
Sunday, May 25, 2014, 9:26:57 AM, you wrote:
> It shows the same build number in the "About" screen. You have to wonder
> exactly where the mixup is.
If you're going to follow Richmond into the deep end of the pool, you
might want to build the source from the development branch. Either
t
On 05/25/2014 10:29 AM, Richmond wrote:
Problems:
1. The menubar (Linux) states it it dp 4.
2. Still unable to put an insertion point into the search fields in
the Dictionary and RevOnline.
3. Double-clicking on a control in the toolbar does nothing.
4. Unable to switch back and forth between
Problems:
1. The menubar (Linux) states it it dp 4.
2. Still unable to put an insertion point into the search fields in
the Dictionary and RevOnline.
3. Double-clicking on a control in the toolbar does nothing.
4. Unable to switch back and forth between Browse and Point except via
the menubar
49 matches
Mail list logo
