Re: AW: failing snapshot when system textsize > 100%

liche Nachricht- Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von Tiemo Hollmann TB via use-livecode Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019 11:14 An: LiveCode User Liste senden Cc: Tiemo Hollmann TB Betreff: failing snapshot when system textsize > 100% Hello, working

AW: failing snapshot when system textsize > 100%

Liste senden Cc: Tiemo Hollmann TB Betreff: failing snapshot when system textsize > 100% Hello, working with LC 9.0.2 on windows 10 I take snapshots of parts of my stack, which works fine as long as the system display setting is set to 100% text size. When you set the system text size to &g

failing snapshot when system textsize > 100%

Hello, working with LC 9.0.2 on windows 10 I take snapshots of parts of my stack, which works fine as long as the system display setting is set to 100% text size. When you set the system text size to > 100% the export snapshot function grabs wrong rectangles (which are located topleft to

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

. >> >> and I use the "on Startup" message to print out a welcome message" >> >> thats all I have so far. >> >> But my executable process is using up 100% of the core . continuously. >> >> what is it doing ? what am I doing wrong

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

s all I have so far. But my executable process is using up 100% of the core . continuously. what is it doing ? what am I doing wrong? v9 .0 on windows 7. Hmmm - this is potentially a bug - in -ui mode the engine falls back to using simpler event handling and such. It doesn't creat

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

great news for me thank you. on top of that I can run 1 of these services on each core listening to a different port. thanks for the links to the benchmarks. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Tom Glod wrote: > > > What

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

Tom Glod wrote: > What are the chances I will get similar performance using a stack and > httpd to process http requests . as i would using lc server .. > if the performance is similar, i feel more confident building using > this form . i'm not producing HTML code . just passing >

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

Mark Wieder wrote: > On 04/05/2018 08:46 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> You may try running the standalone with strace to see the system >> calls it's making: >> >>strace ./mystandalone > > I don't think strace is on Windows. I'd recommend Process Lasso for > seeing what's go

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

What are the chances I will get similar performance using a stack and httpd to process http requests . as i would using lc server .. if the performance is similar, i feel more confident building using this form . i'm not producing HTML code . just passing encrypted arrays back and f

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

it was my goal to benchmark httpd ..but didn't get that far since it maxed out the cpu and didn't let up...then i took out httpd..still did that...and thats how i got to testing an entirely blank new stack. must be a windows thing. i will be running it on digital ocean ubuntu...so i',m no

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

Tom Glod wrote: > hi richard... the standalone opens fine when i don't use the -UI > parameter. it opens up the blank stack and does nothingas its > supposed to since there is no code anywhere doing anything. no library > was modified...or even used. If you're not using any libraries how

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

thanks for those tools Mark. I just tested it again on a plain blank stack . make standalone .run with -ui flag .and its using going full tiltmaybe you can reproduce it? On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

On 04/05/2018 08:46 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: You may try running the standalone with strace to see the system calls it's making:   strace ./mystandalone I don't think strace is on Windows. I'd recommend Process Lasso for seeing what's going on. https://bitsum.com/ But

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

> create a command line server application. > > > > I run it using "-ui" command ... > > > > and I use the "on Startup" message to print out a welcome message" > > > > thats all I have so far. > > > > But my executable pr

Re: commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

l I have so far. > > But my executable process is using up 100% of the core . > continuously. > > what is it doing ? what am I doing wrong? > > v9 .0 on windows 7. I don't know what that library is doing, but I use standalones in nearly every server system I make s

commandine standalone using 100% of core on doing what?

Hi folks, I wanted to benchmark the httpd library and decided to create a command line server application. I run it using "-ui" command ... and I use the "on Startup" message to print out a welcome message" thats all I have so far. But my executable process is

[ANN] This Week in LiveCode 100

Hi all, Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #100 here: https://goo.gl/Gw6qie This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been go

Re: [ANN] mergExt RunRevLive Special $100 off

This will be year! -- M E R Goulding Software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! On 03/05/2013, at 11:21 PM, Nicolas Cueto wrote: > A question, about the potential of mergExt for Android, now that LC is OSS, > and now that there's those Kickstarter "Stretch Goals" in

Re: [ANN] mergExt RunRevLive Special $100 off

Generously tempting sales offer there, Monte. Thanks. A question, about the potential of mergExt for Android, now that LC is OSS, and now that there's those Kickstarter "Stretch Goals" in sight. Perhaps this'll be the year... Cheers. -- Nicolas Cueto _

[ANN] mergExt RunRevLive Special $100 off

Hi LiveCoders I'm leaving for the conference in a few days and won't be able to offer much support to mergExt customers (apart from in person at the conference) until I'm back at my desk in the week of the 27th of May. To make up for my absence I'm announcing a special price until the end of Ma

RE: 100%

ruary 26, 2013 6:12 PM To: How to use LiveCode Subject: Re: 100% Sure can. There's stretch goals now! On 27/02/2013, at 10:05 AM, Ralph DiMola wrote: > If we are at 100% can I still get in? I am still a little fuzzy on how > this all works. -- M E R Goulding Software development

Re: 100%

Alleluia !! ;-) Le 27 févr. 2013 à 13:48, Roger Eller a écrit : > After all, Kevin Miller is a master of risk assessment. A man who saw > something that even the late great Steve couldn't see in HyperCard. A man > who not only invested in a development environment, and grew a strong > company wi

Re: 100%

After all, Kevin Miller is a master of risk assessment. A man who saw something that even the late great Steve couldn't see in HyperCard. A man who not only invested in a development environment, and grew a strong company with it; He invested in us, the life breath of the community. It is that comm

Re: 100%

J. Landman Gay wrote: > Me too, I didn't really believe it would happen. Amazing! Too cool. an amazing "sprint final" ;-) I thought that "the bar was too high"... ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

Re: 100%

I think one thing that is seriously lacking in LC is for it to be able to take advantage of multiple processors. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Monte Goulding wrote: > > On 27/02/2013, at 3:54 PM, Kay C Lan wrote: > > > What goes with Cocoa? A Lifetime supply of Wensleydale and crackers ;-) >

Re: 100%

On 27/02/2013, at 3:54 PM, Kay C Lan wrote: > What goes with Cocoa? A Lifetime supply of Wensleydale and crackers ;-) I think if we get to Cocoa he should be required to also shave a something into the side of his head Vanilla Ice style... -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespo

Re: 100%

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Monte Goulding < mo...@sweattechnologies.com> wrote: > Er... I think there's more past Cocoa that Kevin is holding back. > Hopefully in the last hours the total will be high enough that he feels > confident telling us the next one. > > What goes with Cocoa? A Life

Re: 100%

People often bundle Cocos3D and Box3D. Cocos2D is the sprite engine, Box2D is the 2D physics engine. On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > OK,.. haven't used any of them but the samples I've seen look like physics > with objects falling etc to me... __

Re: 100%

OK,.. haven't used any of them but the samples I've seen look like physics with objects falling etc to me... On 27/02/2013, at 3:12 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: > Yes, hence Box2D or Nape. Cocas2D is just 2D sprites, not physics. -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application

Re: 100%

Yes, hence Box2D or Nape. Cocas2D is just 2D sprites, not physics. On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > I was thinking of physics ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubs

Re: 100%

I was thinking of physics On 27/02/2013, at 3:07 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: > Cocas2D, I think, really only gets you what you have in LiveCode when doing > the special iOS graphics modes. What would be neat would be either Box2D or > Nape (which would have to get a new acronym, because A stands f

Re: 100%

Cocas2D, I think, really only gets you what you have in LiveCode when doing the special iOS graphics modes. What would be neat would be either Box2D or Nape (which would have to get a new acronym, because A stands for ActionScript). On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > >A co

Re: 100%

On 27/02/2013, at 2:22 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote: > I could have used this several times over the last couple years. > > - a proper browser control > > > Definitely. > > I would add to this list a graphics library capable of doing roughly what > Codea does -- us

Re: 100%

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > a high level rest client I could have used this several times over the last couple years. - a proper browser control Definitely. I would add to this list a graphics library capable of doing roughly what Codea

Re: 100%

On 27/02/2013, at 12:58 PM, Mark Smith wrote: > At this pace they are going to comfortably meet all > of their stretch goals Er... I think there's more past Cocoa that Kevin is holding back. Hopefully in the last hours the total will be high enough that he feels confident telling us the next o

Re: 100%

ark -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661339.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vis

RE: 100%

Ralph DiMola wrote > If we are at 100% can I still get in? I am still a little fuzzy on how > this > all works. Absolutely. Go pledge... we are working on stretch goals now. -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661338.html

Re: 100%

going to comfortably meet all of their stretch goals. Kudos to all the people who kept the campaign rolling until the final week. -- Mark -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661337.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list ar

Re: 100%

Judging from the luminaries already contacted by some here, I thought maybe you were BCCing Ray Kurzweil. ;-) Phil Davis On 2/26/13 3:37 PM, tbodine wrote: Sorry, Ralph (not Ray). -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100

RE: 100%

Sorry, Ralph (not Ray). -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661324.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use

RE: 100%

that will put more LiveCode advances on a fast track. Here's a summary of those goals: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661323

Re: 100%

And I'd sure like to see the Cocoa one met at $405! Onward! Well played, everybody. .Jerry On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: > Sure can. There's stretch goals now! > > On 27/02/2013, at 10:05 AM, Ralph DiMola wrote: > >> If we are at 100% can

Re: 100%

Sure can. There's stretch goals now! On 27/02/2013, at 10:05 AM, Ralph DiMola wrote: > If we are at 100% can I still get in? I am still a little fuzzy on how this > all works. -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application development for vertical marke

RE: 100%

If we are at 100% can I still get in? I am still a little fuzzy on how this all works. Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay Sent

Re: 100%

On 2/26/13 3:37 PM, tbodine wrote: Woohoo! I have done a 180 on this campaign from pessimist to optimist. Me too, I didn't really believe it would happen. Amazing! Too cool. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperac

Re: 100%

From: Jacques Hausser To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:41 PM Subject: Re: 100% Well, and now I have to check if my credit card is provisioned enough… ;-) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vis

Re: 100%

Well, we're already 4,000 pounds above the 100% point so there is already some room for play, should someone be such a scumbucket. On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: > Hopefully nobody will reduce their pledge in the next

Re: 100%

Well, and now I have to check if my credit card is provisioned enough… ;-) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mai

Re: 100%

Woohoo! I have done a 180 on this campaign from pessimist to optimist. -- Tom Bodine -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/100-tp4661281p4661287.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: 100%

On 02/26/2013 11:34 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: Hopefully nobody will reduce their pledge in the next 35 hours! That would be sinking about as low as one could get. Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit thi

100%

Hopefully nobody will reduce their pledge in the next 35 hours! ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listi

Re: PreOrder FieldTrip (100%)

Howdy FieldTrip Supporters, Sorry about the silence! A health issue flared up again at the busiest moment and slowed me down, together with some urgent client tasks, and I've been catching up gradually. Thanks for making FieldTrip possible. I'll have a prerelease ready very soon so that you

Re: PreOrder FieldTrip (100%)

(100%) Just curious if there's any news, updates on progress, expected release dates? Paul On 2012-06-21, at 9:25 PM, Curry Kenworthy wrote: We now have reached over 100% of what I estimated was the critical funding necessary to ensure the birth of FieldTrip

Re: ANN: PreOrder FieldTrip (100%)

Just curious if there's any news, updates on progress, expected release dates? Paul On 2012-06-21, at 9:25 PM, Curry Kenworthy wrote: > We now have reached over 100% of what I estimated was the critical funding > necessary to ensure the birth of Fie

ANN: PreOrder FieldTrip (100%)

Thank You LiveCoders, We now have reached over 100% of what I estimated was the critical funding necessary to ensure the birth of FieldTrip! Yay! Among many entry level purchasers, that also includes 7 FieldTrippers, 2 BigFans, and 1 awesome RichTextHero! For these ten special people who

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Hi Peter, I am interested in your printing script but does it work on iOS? greetings, William 2012/5/10 Thomas McGrath III : > With the rreHardcopy external you also gain access to any local Drop Box > accounts as well as AirPrint printers etc. > > -- Tom McGrath III > http://lazyriver.on-rev

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

With the rreHardcopy external you also gain access to any local Drop Box accounts as well as AirPrint printers etc. -- Tom McGrath III http://lazyriver.on-rev.com 3mcgr...@comcast.net On May 10, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote: > On May 8, 2012, at 2:57 PM, William de Smet wrote: >

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

On May 8, 2012, at 2:57 PM, William de Smet wrote: > Now searching the forum for a way to use AirPrint (but that one seems > sort of impossible at the moment). I have a set of handlers that sends a print job from within LC to whatever the currently available printer is, whether a USB-connected p

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Hi William You can use rreHardcopy or mergDoc for AirPrint. mergDoc allows printing via the document preview which will also allow your users to send to other apps etc. if you just want print then rreHardcopy is the way to go. Cheers -- Monte Goulding On 09/05/2012, at 4:57 AM, William de Sme

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

To print using AirPrint you can use the rreHardCopy external from Livecode which is included with you external examples: Together with a script like this: on AirPrint if not rreHardcopyIsAvailable() then answer "Printing is not available at this time." titled "Printing Error"

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Thanks everyone for the contribution! I first tried Mark Schonewille's script and that one works immediately. My app is almost finished now. Now searching the forum for a way to use AirPrint (but that one seems sort of impossible at the moment). greetings, William 2012/5/8 Dar Scott : > Whoops

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

This came in late into my mailbox. Of the index calculation methods, this one works. -- Dar On May 8, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote: > Hi William, > > This should work: > > repeat with x = 1 to 100 > set the backgroundColor of grc ("d" & x) to l

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Whoops. Still not right. The line number has to go up twice as fast as the object number. This can be done with a separate loop variable or doing some math on the repeat loop variable. It might be easiest to count graphic objects and then calculate the lines as (2*i-1) and (2*i) Dar On M

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

This will only set every other odd numbered graphic. Bob On May 8, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Paul Dupuis wrote: > repeat with i = 1 to 200 step 2 > put "d"&i into tObjectName > set the backgroundcolor of grc tObjectName to the text of line i of fld "in" > set the foregroundcolor of grc tObjectName

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

o the text of line i+1 of fld "in" > end repeat > > Bob > > > On May 8, 2012, at 11:21 AM, William de Smet wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> Can anyone help me shorten this script? >> Eventually there will be 100 graphics (d1 to d1

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Yeah just figured that out. I set the grc name to "d" & i div 2 +1 in my new script. Bob On May 8, 2012, at 11:32 AM, John Dixon wrote: > that won't work... > >> >> repeat with i = 1 to 200 step 2 >> set the backgroundcolor of grc "d1" to the text of line i of fld "in" >> set the foregrou

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

> >> >> On May 8, 2012, at 11:21 AM, William de Smet wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> Can anyone help me shorten this script? >>> Eventually there will be 100 graphics (d1 to d100) and 200 lines of >>> text in field "in"

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

That won't work either. See my updated repeat loop using div Bob On May 8, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Paul Dupuis wrote: > repeat with i = 1 to 200 step 2 > put "d"&i into tObjectName > set the backgroundcolor of grc tObjectName to the text of line i of fld "in" > set the foregroundcolor of grc tObj

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

repeat with i = 1 to 200 step 2 put "d"&i into tObjectName set the backgroundcolor of grc tObjectName to the text of line i of fld "in" set the foregroundcolor of grc tObjectName to the text of line i+1 of fld "in" end repeat On 5/8/2012 2:32 PM, John Dixon wrote: > repeat with i = 1 to 20

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

I'm not sure what you intended with the "text of" object expression, so I made an assumption. That can be modified to fit your real need. Perhaps something like this (untested): put field "in" into colorLines repeat with n = 1 to 100 get "d" &am

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Hi William, This should work: repeat with x = 1 to 100 set the backgroundColor of grc ("d" & x) to line 2*x-1 of fld "in" set the foregroundColor of grc ("d" & x) to line 2*x of fld "in" end repeat -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Ec

RE: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

gt; Bob > > > On May 8, 2012, at 11:21 AM, William de Smet wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > Can anyone help me shorten this script? > > Eventually there will be 100 graphics (d1 to d100) and 200 lines of > > text in field "in" > > Each graphic use

Re: Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

there, > > Can anyone help me shorten this script? > Eventually there will be 100 graphics (d1 to d100) and 200 lines of > text in field "in" > Each graphic uses two lines of follow up numbers (correct English?) of fld > "in" > > set the backg

Is there a way to shorten this script? (100 graphics and 200 lines of text)

Hi there, Can anyone help me shorten this script? Eventually there will be 100 graphics (d1 to d100) and 200 lines of text in field "in" Each graphic uses two lines of follow up numbers (correct English?) of fld "in" set the backgroundcolor of grc "d1" to

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

I'm on the PC. Mike Sent from my iPad On Oct 25, 2011, at 12:32 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: > On 10/25/11 6:44 AM, Roger Eller wrote: > >> >> Show Safari in Finder. Get info. Check the 32-bit mode checkbox. It >> should be there at least in Snow Leopard, and Lion. > > Right, I thought o

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

On 10/25/11 6:44 AM, Roger Eller wrote: Show Safari in Finder. Get info. Check the 32-bit mode checkbox. It should be there at least in Snow Leopard, and Lion. Right, I thought of that after I posted. Haven't had time to check if it works though. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:17 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 10/24/11 5:43 PM, David C. wrote: > > I verified that the plugin seems to work using 64 bit Firefox& Safari >> 5.1.1 (7534.51.22) for Windows. >> Does NOT work in Chrome (not supposed to yet I think). >> Did NOT work using I.E. in eith

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

On 10/24/11 5:43 PM, David C. wrote: I verified that the plugin seems to work using 64 bit Firefox& Safari 5.1.1 (7534.51.22) for Windows. Does NOT work in Chrome (not supposed to yet I think). Did NOT work using I.E. in either 32 or 64 bit mode. Doesn't seem to work in 64-bit Firefox on Mac,

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

Drinker: Whose round is it? Pete Molly's Revenge On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote: > On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:43 PM, David C. wrote: > > > Now, the question is whether that proverbial glass is half empty or > > half full? ;-) > > Optimist:

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:43 PM, David C. wrote: > Now, the question is whether that proverbial glass is half empty or > half full? ;-) Optimist: The glass is half full. Pessimist: The glass is half empty. Engineer: The glass is twice a large as it needs to be. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmai

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

It's both, you silly goose! ;-) Bob On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:43 PM, David C. wrote: > Now, the question is whether that proverbial glass is half empty or > half full? ;-) > > Best regards, > David C. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.ru

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

> Also, upgraded to 5.0 > and was told they fixed the web plugin, but chrome still does not work > as a browser for the revlet plugin - is there a new version to download > (the revlet installer)? Since I cannot access the site, I cannot > download the installer. > > Does anyone know if web has bee

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

From: "Admin" >> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:24:56 PM >> Subject: Runrev site still not 100% >> >> >> >> Although the site is kinda back up, not really. If you type >> www.runrev.com I still get the

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

u?fmt=freebusy > http://go.carleton.edu/f > > - Original Message - > From: "Admin" > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:24:56 PM > Subject: Runrev site still not 100% > > > > Although the site is kinda back up, not rea

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

://mail.carleton.edu/home/cb...@carleton.edu?fmt=freebusy http://go.carleton.edu/f - Original Message - From: "Admin" To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:24:56 PM Subject: Runrev site still not 100% Although the site is kinda back up, not really. I

Re: Runrev site still not 100%

I had the same issue with cpanel /apache, but went in and cleared my cache, and turned off chromes preload stuff and it started working. Of course that was until a 30 min or so ago when i can't get to www.runrev.com again. On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Admin wrote: > > > Although the site is

Runrev site still not 100%

Although the site is kinda back up, not really. If you type www.runrev.com I still get the apache and cpanel error. I can get into the site by going to lessons.runrev.com - that works fine. From there, I can use the store, but almost everything else does not work. I wonder how long it will ta