On 30/09/2011 17:23, stephen barncard wrote:
> THis is absurd for them to expect this to take off.
>
Optimistic perhaps, absurd is too strong. It strikes me as YAOM (Yet
Another Optimistic Moonshot). If they are exactly on target they may do
very well. If they miss, even slightly, they probably g
On 09/30/2011 07:23 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
THis is absurd for them to expect this to take off.
Well, I ALWAYS read the BBC website, but ALMOST NEVER TRUST what they
write . . . :)
And, certainly, the whole thing seems to be a load of people being paid
to sit
around in committee rooms
THis is absurd for them to expect this to take off.
What about security - not trivial
Is this proprietary? - if so, bound to fail
what processor is this based on?
Who coordinates development and support?
How is it paid for?
an OS of any kind is a big deal. I am very skeptical.
On 30 September 2
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15109403
http://cataspanglish.com/2010/07/26/urban-os-a-city-operating-system/
-
http://urbanlabs.net/index.php/UrbanLabs_OS_%28English%29
How good is your (err ?) C
