Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Yes. Gatekeeper and the Mac App Store are two totally separate things, Ill just keep this reply back on the original Gatekeeper thread to avoid confusion. Ive just been playing with gatekeeper signing this morning, took 15 minutes max to get the developer id from Appe, then sign an app success

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows > The Ultimate Collection of Winsock Software ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url t

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

They keep putting it back, the current deadline is June 1st, after that all new apps and updates will have to be sandboxed, unless of course they put it back again! On 9 May 2012, at 20:00, Bob Sneidar wrote: > Wasn't there a discussion that the sandbox would become mandatory at some > poi

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi Andrew, As someone who has obviously been through this process, I'm hoping you can enlighten me on a few things. There is a document named "Mac App Store Review Guide" on the Apple Developers web site which includes several things in it that are an issue for me, e.g.: -* Apps that are "beta",

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Wasn't there a discussion that the sandbox would become mandatory at some point for app store apps, or was that a misnomer? Bob On May 9, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Thanks Andrew. I will have to change my app then. I guess I can put some > version-dependant code at startup to m

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Thanks Andrew. I will have to change my app then. I guess I can put some version-dependant code at startup to move the prefs file to it's new location if necessary. Don't like the sound of the sandbox! I guess I should look into that before making a final decision on whether I want this thing in

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

I take that back. http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons > They must be only for subscribers. There is no link on the home page for > downloads or icons. > > Bob > > > On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > >> By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my >

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

They must be only for subscribers. There is no link on the home page for downloads or icons. Bob On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my > web host is fatcow (who incidentally have a huge selection of 32x32

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Yes it will, ive had an app rejected for writing to the preferences folder. I stick with ~/Library/Application Support/ and just put everything in there. >From June 1st there is also sandboxing to contend with for the Mac App Store, >but I understand sandboxing and the gatekeeper are two tota

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Someone that "Orks" cows. :-P On May 9, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Jerry Jensen wrote: > And, what the heck is a coworker? > > On May 9, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > >> And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I >> believe it's a bovine plot to take over our ti

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

And, what the heck is a coworker? On May 9, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I > believe it's a bovine plot to take over our time line (veiled reference to > Heinlein's "Number of the Beast"). > > :-O > > Tim > > On

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

And don't forget "Don't have a cow, Man!", or Cowabunga, or holy cow!. I believe it's a bovine plot to take over our time line (veiled reference to Heinlein's "Number of the Beast"). :-O Tim On May 9, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Peter Haworth wrote: > By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

By the way, whats' with all these "cow" web sites? There's tucows and my web host is fatcow (who incidentally have a huge selection of 32x32 and 16x16 icons available for free and royalty free). Pete lcSQL Software On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote: > P

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Thanks Bill, checking into all these. Pete lcSQL Software On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote: > Pete, > > Here are some links that were instrumental to me for code signing > InfoWallet and one of them has a link to a $49 commercial application to > help ma

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Matthias, Thanks for the link to the article. I've started the process and have doen as much as I can until my Apple Developer Program membership is activated. Maybe this question will be answered once I can get to the Mac Store Guidelines document, but the article says you have to store prefs fi

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi, seems i found an answer already. The revUp newsletter #112 contains an article how to submit an livecode app to the mac app store. http://runrev.com/newsletter/june/issue112/newsletter4.php I just hope that this still works. Regards, Matthias Am 09.05.2012 um 11:54 schrieb Matthias Rebb

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi, Am 08.05.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Andrew Henshaw: > As far as I was aware all you need to do is sign your apps, if you publish > an app to the Mac App Store it already has to be signed. > > To do this you need the $ 99/year Apple Developer Program, and then you can > use a few simple termin

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Hi Pete, get a look there : http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/ ... cheap and with a free, nice utility, to 'sign' your Win applications (/... I use this with my LiveCode Windows Applications, on Mac I'm on the Developer Program and, in the annual fee, it's included the certificate to sign your

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Pete, Here are some links that were instrumental to me for code signing InfoWallet and one of them has a link to a $49 commercial application to help make is easier. I haven't looked at it (doing it the hard way myself) but if it is half as good as they describe it would be worth it. Code sign

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

While we're on the topic of signing, how do you do the equivalent for Windows apps to get rid of the "Unknown Publisher" message? Pete lcSQL Software On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Andrew Henshaw wrote: > As far as I was aware all you need to do is sign your apps, if

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

As far as I was aware all you need to do is sign your apps, if you publish an app to the Mac App Store it already has to be signed. To do this you need the $ 99/year Apple Developer Program, and then you can use a few simple terminal commands to sign an app. It should not affect Livecode at

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Yes, I guess it's not totally off topic. I'm not very knowldgeable on this but I THINK if you join the Apple Developer Program ($99/year), you get a certificate from them for free. Pete lcSQL Software On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Bruce Pokras wrote: > Why is this "[

Re: [OT] Gatekeeper

Why is this "[OT}"? Won't Apple's use of Gatekeeper affect Livecode apps for OS X? I would hate it if every person who wants to try my software would get a message from Gatekeeper that "this might be malware. Are really you sure that you want to run it?" Are Livecode apps that are complied for

[OT] Gatekeeper

Just got a newsletter from Apple with this link to a page about the Mountain Lion Gatekeeper ID: https://developer.apple.com/resources/developer-id/ Probably old news to some folks but thought it would be worth sharing. Pete lcSQL Software _