Dear List Members,
Sometimes we make a joke of this, but it is essential to the useful
operation of this list that *everyone* on the list respects the rules,
which have been imposed for very good reason. Clearly you are all
aware of the no politics and religion rule, but some of you may hav
On 25 Jan 2011, at 01:14, Scott Rossi wrote:
> There are more polite ways to
> go about reminding folks about the "no politics/religion/cheese" aspect of
> the list.
I was not aiming to be polite, and of course i am sorry if my message was vague
on that point.
__
No worries Scott. Thanks. I've actually had a nice private chat with the
original poster who assured me he had no intention of offending anyone, which I
also had no intention of. I thought I was putting together a rather witty
tongue-half-in-cheek response to the whole extremist thing. Oh well.
Recently, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
>> I wouldn't think of it. :-) I enjoyed your well thought out rebuttal though.
>> ;-)
>>
>> Bob
>
> I rebutted nothing. Mostly because you have no argument, and this is not the
> space, so please be reminded to not reply here.
May I suggest that stating Bob
On 25 Jan 2011, at 00:27, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> I wouldn't think of it. :-) I enjoyed your well thought out rebuttal though.
> ;-)
>
> Bob
I rebutted nothing. Mostly because you have no argument, and this is not the
space, so please be reminded to not reply here.
--
official ChatRev page:
h
I wouldn't think of it. :-) I enjoyed your well thought out rebuttal though. ;-)
Bob
On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
>
> On 24 Jan 2011, at 21:27, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> blah blah wank blah wank wank blah
>
> I disagree, and you can't make me agree to your drivel by repl
On 24 Jan 2011, at 21:27, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> blah blah wank blah wank wank blah
I disagree, and you can't make me agree to your drivel by replying to this.
have fun
Bjoernke
--
official ChatRev page:
http://bjoernke.com?target=chatrev
Chat with other RunRev developers:
go stack URL "http:/
Then let's refrain from calling other views extreme and saying that they are
unacceptable by all reputable scientists everywhere, okay?
Thanks
On Jan 24, 2011, at 12:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 1/24/11 2:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's
On 1/24/11 2:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's have a brief
rundown on what we know so far:
Oh, let's not.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
Whoops sorry about the double post!
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Hi Doug. I just sent this to a use list in response to someone who remarked
that no current scientific viewpoint considers such an extreme point of view
like Creation to be valid. I thought you might enjoy it. :-)
Bob
Hi all.
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's have a brie
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's have a brief rundown on
what we know so far: A super infinitely small dense point of nothingness got a
little too infinitely small and dense and exploded into an almost infinite
universe with bits of super (albeit not quite infinitely) dens
12 matches
Mail list logo
