re: To Infinity and beyond!
Would you mind sharing some of that excess capacity?
I don't mean the 'infinity" stuff.
I mean the "beyond" stuff.
I'm wondering ... does "beyond" still use a binary system?
TED
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Has-
I also have the founder package, running on diesel.
My FTP is failing during uploads, but I can use CPANEL to upload files.
My "disk space usage" report shows the following in the top section:
/9,857.63 MB total disk space used.
50,000.00 MB quota limit (0.00 MB used)./
The bottom section of
re: you might consider using the more ubiquitous /* ... */
Yes, I have done that.
However, I have been "conditioned" to distrust that format. I use the
"ubiquitous" format extensively for commenting blocks of code. ie: How did
we get here, what are we doing here, and what do we expect as a re
You're right. Everybody has their own way of working.
I have no reason to doubt they fixed it, considering the detailed
self-validating script I submitted. However, I will most certainly verify
it in my own app when I enhance that app. If it fails for some reason at
that point in time, then the
Richard: re: I thought Kay's post lent a welcome balance to the discussion.
Good for you. It's all in perspective. The tone of Kay's post certainly
didn't sound like a "welcome balance" to me. It sounded condescending, so I
responded in kind. Trust me, that was far milder than what I felt lik
Kay C Lan: Well, I'm glad you got that off your chest. Feel better?
It seems you have an emotional tie to somebody or something at RunRev. It
could simply be that your years of Revolution/LiveCode usage has created a
strong loyalty. Whatever ... It's likely your view is somewhat biased
towards
re: Does LC6.7.3 not work for you until LC7 performance improves?
I gave up quite a while ago trying to use any version higher than 6.1
because I ran into an intermittent issue with arrays. I don't even remember
what the problem was now, but that same app now works in 7.0.4.
Well, it *almost* w
Bernard: I didn't see the transition in Dr. Brett's discussion to be as black
and white as your interpretation.
re: all the goodness of widgets and the javascript engine and the new "DSL"
language enhancements seem to me to be far more significant than unicode.
Agree 100%, and I am looking forwa
Paul: Thanks for the response.
I asked: "/Can we turn off that /[Unicode]/ detection, thus eliminating
Unicode processing?/"
You replied: "/No, this has been asked several times on the list, it's part
of the internal processing that LC uses and is too deeply embedded to
eliminate/".
I have been
No response to my prior post, so let's try this again ...
Dr Peter Brett wrote: "Internally, the LC7 engine only uses Unicode if it
has to. If your application only uses native strings, then LC7 will only
use native strings. Built-in Unicode support has very little to do with the
fact that LC7 i
re: Internally, the LC7 engine only uses Unicode if it has to. If your
application only uses native strings,
then LC7 will only use native strings. Built-in Unicode support has very
little to do with the fact that LC7 is slower for some workload
I don't now, and don't intend to, use Unicode.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
