Bernd:
> A new version of Code Folding has been uploaded
That's a good effort. Thanks!
Best wishes,
Curry Kenworthy
Radically Innovative Christian LiveCode Development
"PASSION for Elegant, Efficient Code!"
https://livecodeconsulting.com/
___
use-l
Bill,
Well, for the basics, there is this LiveCode Lesson:
https://lessons.livecode.com/m/4071/l/1496056-how-do-i-put-my-first-app-on-the-web-lc-10-and-later
It shows the basic/standard way of deploying a LiveCode stack to web.
The WebDeployHelper tool mainly hooks into the final steps of that
A new version of Code Folding has been uploaded to the Forum
https://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38912&p=229971#p229971
It addresses a couple of bugs and has been tested to work from 9.6.9 up to
9.6.12 (RC1) and 10.0.0 (DP8)
Kind regards
Bernd
___
seconding on the compiler as the biggest thing. (you owe me a year, lc. i
paid for it)
my #2 priority would be more effort on mobes (long paragraph deleted -
you're welcome).
but i could be convinced that #3 could be web, if it wasn't a squirrel,
too. (you also owe me a year, here, lc).
On Wed, M
Yes, my top priority would definitely be the compiler, and second would be
seamless standalone app building. I would love a true compiled version of my
apps, but barring that, being able to build ALL my app for all platforms in one
pass, and then being able to build again without having to quit
Andreas:
> all it’s features really should be available in the standalone
> builder of the first stable release of LC 10
Indeed. Another context of ...
Richard Gaskin (Oct 13, 2023):
> SIMPLIFYING DEPLOYMENT IS THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.
This is a true classic, the #1 best comment last year!
M
4d's qodly, which is, imho, even a more promising web dev tool, is also
stalled, and has been stalled for almost six months.
i can't hide my disappointment with lc's eternal chasing of the next
squirrel (script compiler is now 17 months overdue because, ooh! look! web
apps! squirrel!). however, i a