I was thinking the same thing.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 26, 2024, at 16:54, Tom Glod via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Richard, thanks for chiming in.
>
> 1. dunno, it can't be that hard, i would take an existing implementation in
> another language and rewrite it in livecode.
> 2. dunno
>
Richard, thanks for chiming in.
1. dunno, it can't be that hard, i would take an existing implementation in
another language and rewrite it in livecode.
2. dunno
3. interesting thought, I will look into testing this.
4. many blockchains are websockets only, and most API with data "streams".
Mike,
Tom Glod wrote:
> Can we get a measure again as to the interest in web sockets implementation
> in livecode?
Requested 2015, last activity 2020:
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16091
Given the elapsed time so far, maybe we can find another way to do this.
- How hard would it be to s
i'm interested in client side, especially on mobile. we have an app that is
in the wild that would be much better if we could stop pinging the server
every five seconds.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 4:10 PM Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can we get a
Hi Folks,
Can we get a measure again as to the interest in web sockets implementation
in livecode?
As far as I know we still do not have one that is available or able to be
contributed to,
I'd be willing to put in some engineering time if there was help from
others available.
Here are the full spe
