Thank you very much.
Best, Richmond.
On 25.10.23 17:15, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
This code is MIT license, so freely usable. It does rely on code from HQ, but
should be usable on either the open source or commercial versions.
Brian Milby
br...@milby7.com
On Oct 25, 2023, at 4:36
Paul.
The construction "answer this card of stack “X” does not work if you are not on
stack “X”:
answer the currentCard of stack “X” —works
answer the name of this card of stack “X —works
answer this card of stack “X”—Nope
Craig
> On Oct 25, 2023, at 8:57 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-live
This code is MIT license, so freely usable. It does rely on code from HQ, but
should be usable on either the open source or commercial versions.
Brian Milby
br...@milby7.com
> On Oct 25, 2023, at 4:36 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I should be grateful if you could exp
On 10/25/2023 12:34 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
If you want to do stuff with the current card of a stack, then don't
use the currentCard property - 'this card of stack ...' *is* a chunk
reference and thus it doesn't care whether the card has a name or not.
Okay, I get that
I should be grateful if you could explain the licensing on your work.
Best, Richmond.
On 25.10.23 3:44, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
Well, it sure took me a while to get around to this. I guess better late
than never though. Not sure where the best place to put it, so I just
added it t
