Roger
On your wife’s machine - if you right click the app and choose Open from the
context menu, do you get more options about opening?
If you adjust settings in the Security and Privacy System Preferences can you
downgrade standards to allow a one time opening?
If neither of these work, then
Here is a report on the back door approach to opening a standalone on MAC OS
11.2:
I built a stack precisely as Jacqueline specified and made a Mac standalone of
it. I checked to make sure it worked on my own computer. I then sent the
standalone to my wife’s computer – another Mac running the
Thanks, Scott. I will be testing all this in the next day or so and will report.
Roger
> On Mar 27, 2021, at 4:56 PM, scott--- via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Roger,
> Yes, I believe it is on an individual app basis that occurs at the time the
> app is being first opened.
> —
> Scott
>
>> On
Thank you, Richard for these responses . . . some of which I will have to
consider for a while to better understand. But I still think this idea has
merit, is very easy to do and maintain and makes Livecode even more attractive
to prospective customers, especially those who require easy collabor
On 27/03/2021 02:43, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
This makes the Community Edition a natural fit for a generic player,
since the proliferation the license explicitly encourages would be
very much with the grain of its goals.
But then we have to ask: how many of those who might enjo
Roger,
Yes, I believe it is on an individual app basis that occurs at the time the app
is being first opened.
—
Scott
> On Mar 27, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Roger Guay via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Jacque,
>
> You always come thru with such great clarity and thoroughness. I remember
> going thru thi
Jacque,
You always come thru with such great clarity and thoroughness. I remember going
thru this process a few years ago, but I thought this back door approach was
closed by Apple within the last couple of OS releases. Indeed, looking at my
Security&Privacy tab of System Preferences in OS 11.2
Roger Guay wrote:
In the good ol days, I could build a standalone for the Mac,
Windows and Linux and distribute it willy-nilly.
On desktop you still can, sort of, if you don't mind instructing your users how to get around
the security blocks that both Windows and Mac OS have adopted. If your
On 27/03/2021 18:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
My response to Alex was apparently too long to be read, but I touched
on this in third block, re "security", re implications for a player as
well:
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/2021-March/263948.html
Not at all "too
I despair . . . how could one lower oneself to two fingers of 'whiskey'?
Just now I am enjoying a glass of whisky (without the offending 'e').
Richmond.
On 27.03.21 20:29, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Roger Guay wrote:
On Mar 26, 2021, at 5:35 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What are y
Roger Guay wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2021, at 5:35 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> What are you looking for? When were these "good ol days"
>> in which one could run stack files without an engine, and
>> how did that work?
>
> In the good ol days, I could build a standalone for the Mac,
> Windows and L
Hi
Has anyone had problems with file deletion by LC under Windows 10?
According to the docs the following commands should delete a file:
delete file pathname
open file pathname for write
Also the shell() command sequence:
put UnixToWinPath(pFile) into pWinFile
Hi
Has anyone had problems with file deletion by LC under Windows 10?
According to the docs the following commands should delete a file:
delete file pathname
open file pathname for write
Also the shell() command sequence:
put UnixToWinPath(pFile) into pWinFile
A couple of things. The developer is not even required to build a standalone,
and presumably it would be easier to strip out or hide the IDE of
LiveCodeLight. Otherwise, either way is good.
Roger
> On Mar 27, 2021, at 10:36 AM, Richmond via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm missing somethi
Maybe I'm missing something, but what would be the advantage of using
stack runner
over a standalone?
Richmond.
On 27.03.21 19:27, Roger Guay via use-livecode wrote:
Could be, but that requires you to be an Apple Developer. Too much hassle! A
LiveCodeLight from RunRev that runs stacks without
Could be, but that requires you to be an Apple Developer. Too much hassle! A
LiveCodeLight from RunRev that runs stacks without the IDE would be easier.
Roger
> On Mar 27, 2021, at 10:18 AM, ELS Prothero via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I thought that if you set up beta testers, with the id of
A few days ago, a very impressive post came in here from a researcher at an
accelerator lab somewhere. I’ve lost the post and may have some details wrong.
As I recall he was very complimentary of LiveCode as a tool for his work but
was lamenting that he could no longer easily share his work with
I thought that if you set up beta testers, with the id of the device an app
would be run on, others could run your app as a beta tester. But, perhaps,you
need an apple license to do even that?
Bill
William Prothero
https://earthlearningsolutions.org
> On Mar 26, 2021, at 10:10 PM, David Squance
Greetings!
I've been looking around the boards and whatnot and see there has been some
discussion about implementing web sockets in LiveCode. Has anyone come up with
a library or a way to do this effectively for the Big 4 (Windows, Mac, iOS and
Android)?
Thanks in advance,
Dan
__
I too remember the good ‘ol days Roger and in fact still have one of my
eLearning shell projects that still runs stand-alone on both Catalina and
Windows, although I’d have to check which version of Windows. The project has
stacks calling stacks and external media. The MacOS stand-alone versio
This conversation has given me some focus and clarification of the basic idea.
Here is what I would love to see: A LiveCodeLight downloadable from the mother
ship. LiveCodeLight would be a stripped down version of the community edition
that would not open the IDE, but would open and run stacks.
21 matches
Mail list logo
