On 7/1/19 11:47 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Curious: how long does it take to load the document in Chrome on the
same device?
Didn't get a moment to check until now. I had to count in my head, but
it's about 4-5 seconds in Firefox. Maybe 8-10 seconds in Chrome.
13 minutes in C
I did Software service for a few years as part of my previous job, also
on-site.
And there are many more programs who have these issues with AV programs.
And sometimes it is needed to stop using Norton or AVG or whatever just
to get the program running they need to work with.
Op 4-7-2019 om
Virtual Kisses!
That rocks so completely I am almost in love with you . . .
. . . almost because:
1. I believe in marital vows, and, unfashionably, love my wife after 28
years of marriage.
2. Am 98% heterosexual (anyone who says they are 100% is being
disingenuous).
Richmond.
On 4.07.19
Hmphf . . .
. . . feeling fairly 'pseudo' myself, and stumping off to work my way
through something
a bit more worthwhile, like, "Le Recherche Sur Les Verites" by Nicholas
Malebranche
(OK, OK, I admit it, I'm reading the Lennon and Olscamp English
translation), which,
frankly, rocks.
Richmon
"it" is, quite frankly, both a bore and something that makes 9-11 year
olds wish that
Paiget were not dead, but were on hand to explain things (and as the
average 9-11 year old
is not up-to-speed in Swiss French . . . ), or, at a push, Seymour Papert.
While I am, arguably, at the stage of abstr
Almost completely 'done'. 8-)
Where would I be without your help throughout the years (well, about 18
at my last count)?
No! Don't answer that one; it's rhetorical.
Richmond.
On 4.07.19 15:26, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Richmond,
Am 04.07.2019 um 14:14 schrieb Richmond via u
Would this work?
clone control "gizmo" as "blivet"
> On Jul 4, 2019, at 10:04 AM, doc hawk via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode
> wrote:
>>
>> set the name of last img to “XXX_2"
>
> Also
>
> clone control “gizmo”
> set the name of
On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode
wrote:
>
> set the name of last img to “XXX_2"
Also
clone control “gizmo”
set the name of it to “blivet"
Will handle your new object.
If I’m going to work with the new object for a few lines, I always use
put the long id of it i
Richmond.
(pseudo)
Duplicate object
set the name of last object to the short name of the last object & the
number of thatObjectType + 1
Note that as of v.8, and this is an known issue, the keyword "last" may not
support groups. I am not sure if this has been fixed in v.9.
Craig
--
Sent from
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:27 AM Richmond via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I've lost this . . . having done it several times before . . .
>
> So: I duplicate an object, let's call it img "XXX", so I end up with
> 2 objects called "XXX" (which is problematic), and I wish to
Hi all,
> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:31 schrieb Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
> :
>
> Klaus,
>
> you are right! The dictionary entry is wrong.
>
> It would not make logical sense to be able to set the short name of
> something just as it is not logical to set the long or abbreviated name of
> it. H
It is possible to make it an optional keyword though.
set the [short] name of to
Sean Cole
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 13:29, Klaus major-k via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Am 04.07.2019 um 14:22 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.co
Klaus,
you are right! The dictionary entry is wrong.
It would not make logical sense to be able to set the short name of
something just as it is not logical to set the long or abbreviated name of
it. Hence why we have ONLY set the name of it. The 'short' keyword would be
superfluous.
But the dic
> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:22 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:12 schrieb Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
>> :
>>
>> No it is not consistent, but some of the syntax was baked into Metacard long
>> ago,
>> often in response to some specific customer a
Hi Richmond,
> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:14 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode
> :
>
> However . . .
>
> If I do this:
>
> onmouseUp
> setthelockScreentotrue
> setthemoveSpeedto65000
> putitem 1 ofthemouseLocintoML1
> putitem 2 ofthemouseLocintoML2
> moveimg "mill" toML1, ML2
> copyimg "mill" togroup
Hi Paul,
> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:12 schrieb Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
> :
>
> No it is not consistent, but some of the syntax was baked into Metacard long
> ago,
> often in response to some specific customer asking for a way to do some
> specific thing.
> Remember, Metacard was effectively a
However . . .
If I do this:
onmouseUp
setthelockScreentotrue
setthemoveSpeedto65000
putitem 1 ofthemouseLocintoML1
putitem 2 ofthemouseLocintoML2
moveimg "mill" toML1, ML2
copyimg "mill" togroup"map"
setthenameoflast image to("mill" & ML1 & "," & ML2)
setthemoveSpeedto200
setthelockScre
No it is not consistent, but some of the syntax was baked into Metacard
long ago, often in response to some specific customer asking for a way
to do some specific thing. Remember, Metacard was effectively a product
of a single person.
For LiveCode to change it now would break far fr too many e
Thanks, Bob, that’s what I suspected.
From the UI point of view, its just feels a bit clunky - combined with being
uncertain about whether the speechrecognitionserver is still working or whether
recognition has failed, and whether the human needs to repeat the phrase or
not.
Maybe I am confla
Hi Richmond,
> Am 04.07.2019 um 14:02 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode
> :
>
> Thank you, Klaus,
>
> makes me feel even more stupid than I was feeling already. ;-)
you are welcome! :-D
> Richmond.
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
https://www.major-k.de
kl...@major-k.de
Thank you, Klaus,
makes me feel even more stupid than I was feeling already. ;-)
Richmond.
On 4.07.19 11:30, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Richmond,
Am 04.07.2019 um 10:26 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode
:
I've lost this . . . having done it several times before . . .
So: I d
Hi friends,
this is on my mind for a very long time.
put the name of img 1 -> image "xyz"
put the short name of img 1 -> xyz
However:
set the short name of img 1 to "xyz2" -> compilation error, see below...
We have to:
set the name of img 1 to "xyz2"
This does not seem logical at all to me!?
local tList
repeat with rImgNum = 1 to the number of images [in card "x"]
if the short name of img rImgNum is among the lines of tList then
set the name of img rImgNum to the name of tImg rImgNum & "x"
end if
put the short name of img rImgNum into line rImgNum of tList
end repea
Hi Richmond,
> Am 04.07.2019 um 10:26 schrieb Richmond via use-livecode
> :
>
> I've lost this . . . having done it several times before . . .
>
> So: I duplicate an object, let's call it img "XXX", so I end up with
> 2 objects called "XXX" (which is problematic), and I wish to
> rename the new
I've lost this . . . having done it several times before . . .
So: I duplicate an object, let's call it img "XXX", so I end up with
2 objects called "XXX" (which is problematic), and I wish to
rename the new version of "XXX" . . .
err . . .
set the name of the last/recent/latest/headache
Richm
25 matches
Mail list logo
