I’ll be interested in hearing the answer to this. I had assumed that the setup
would be a splash stack that loaded the other app stacks, which were in the
resources folder. True?
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 9:25 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> w
J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> It's not actually a regression, it's always been that way. But it's
> too piddly to bother the team with right now, and there's a
> workaround. Maybe
It's curious that the entire Stacks pane is disabled when either mobile
platform is selected.
That
It's not actually a regression, it's always been that way. But it's too
piddly to bother the team with right now, and there's a workaround. Maybe
I'll ask why it works that way when I see them at the conference.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://w
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> ...encrypted scripts don't matter in the app stores. So I'm still
> wondering what the reason is for disabling it in the SB.
The key question is whether the disabling was intentional.
If it's a regression while making other changes it all makes sense.
Without a bug repo
Apparently my theory of why we can't do it in the standalone builder was
wrong, and encrypted scripts don't matter in the app stores. So I'm
still wondering what the reason is for disabling it in the SB.
I knew how to set a password on a stack, but if you do that then you
have to enter the pas
I just was creating a simple test stack under Windows 10, LC9.0.4rc2 and
discovered that whether I allowed automatic selection of inclusions or
explicitly included the Ask/Answer dialogs, the Ask dialog was not being
included in my Windows standalone of this test stack.
See https://quality.liv
I'm sure you meant the source code is encrypted. The stack itself is never
encrypted.
Bob S
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 09:30 , JJS via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> If you use this sentence in the message box (which i got from another fine
> member here) the stack is encrypted, and when turned into
What you've seen is the difference of the htmltext of a browser
(also of a browser widget) and the *generated* htmltext.
The latter includes for example also parts that are generated by
JavaScript parts of the htmltext.
> BobS. wrote:
> I've seen that too.
>
> > Rick H. wrote:
> > I thought it w
If you use this sentence in the message box (which i got from another
fine member here) the stack is encrypted, and when turned into an APK is
well accepted by Google Play Store:
*set*thepasswordofstack"beststackever"to"mostdifficultpasswordofalltimes"
Op 18-4-2019 om 02:33 schreef Richard Ga
I've seen that too.
Bob S
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:22 , Rick Harrison via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for getting back to me on this.
>
>> The htmltext is the page source code. So
>>
>> put the htmltext of widget "browser" into field 1
>
> I thought it was the source code originally
10 matches
Mail list logo
