Re: Upcoming MacOS 14.5 with software “notarization” requirements

ugh great. just last night i was like..."you know ... i need more s*** to think about." . and here it is. Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: Upcoming MacOS 14.5 with software “notarization” requirements

This is one of the reasons, having been given a swanky, new 2018 Mac Mini I have kept hold of my Polycarbonate iMac running Mac OS 107 and a Polycarbonate PPC iMac running MacOS 10.4, 10.5 and "Classic". Richmond. On 16.04.19 18:18, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: I agree with most of what

Re: Upcoming MacOS 14.5 with software “notarization” requirements

I agree with most of what you said, but I've been getting alerts recently that certain apps are not optimized to run on Mojave, which is their way of telling me that some update in the near future is going to render them unusable. These are not old apps they are recently purchased apps. What e

Browser HTML Source & URLs

I am able to load the browser widget with a URL and go to the URL successfully. I can get the HTMLtext of the page I have browsed to just fine. What I have yet to do is to get the page source code of the page I have browsed to in LiveCode into a field. I also would like the browser widget to sho

Re: Upcoming MacOS 14.5 with software “notarization” requirements

"consistent scientific HIG again" . . . "scientific" . . . is not a word I would use about galloping subjectivity. "a bit on the obsessive control, hard-on-the-eye schemes, and planned obsolescence" Yes, these are disgusting. Not convinced about "hard-on-the-eye schemes" as they seem to be all

Re: Upcoming MacOS 14.5 with software “notarization” requirements

Richmond: > The frightening thing about this is that Microsoft produce a > fairly shoddy product, and as Linux has signally failed to > displace Microsoft from world dominator, it will become > ever worse and shoddier without any healthy competition. So the only scary thing about Apple doing s