Hi Craig. No what I am doing is when suspendStack fires, I check a property in
the current stack. If it is not "view" I pop a dialog (as sheet) alerting the
user thet they have unsaved changes, then I go to the stack (otherwise it will
navigate away which is what I am trying to prevent).
I'm t
> On 22 Sep 2018, at 5:34 am, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Monte, I couldn't reproduce this either. Using LC 901, things seem to work OK
> on 12!
Thanks Curry
Cheers
Monte
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.
Monte:
So if you have a recipe that crashes 9.0.1 I would
really like to have it!
Monte, I couldn't reproduce this either. Using LC 901, things seem to
work OK on 12!
Best wishes,
Curry Kenworthy
Custom Software Development
LiveCode Training and Consulting
http://livecodeconsulting.com/
Hi.
"...For instance, I can click the window of the mainstack while in a
substack and I get the suspendStack message. Subsequent clicks however do
NOT get sent."
Now I am not sure what you mean. If I have a mainstack with a suspendStack
handler in the stack script, and one or more sub stacks, tha
I put the suspendStack handler in the card instead. Same thing. Seems the
suspendStack message is only getting sent once for every different stack I
switch to. For instance, I can click the window of the mainstack while in a
substack and I get the suspendStack message. Subsequent clicks however
