When the GDPR comes into force in May 2018, Facebook et al will be legally
obliged to remove all of your data from its databases should you make that
request https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/
On 12 Dec 2017 4:28 am, "J. Landman Gay via use-livecode" <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> That
That's kind of amazing, half the no-facebook people in the world are on
this list. I'd be a boring participant anyway, I usually skip breakfast.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On December 11, 2
Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 12/11/2017 03:29 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
> > I don't know, I'm one of the six people on earth who doesn't have
> > or want a Facebook account
>
> I'm one of the other six. Never been tempted by it.
If you develop apps for others to publish, that can
On 12/11/2017 04:36 PM, Dr. Hawkins via use-livecode wrote:
I guess I make it three.
I signed up, and didn't log in, the day they announced their own
email, just to stop someone else from being labeled dochawk.
One thing I found while helping a neighbor get untangled from fb is that
you can n
I guess I make it three.
I signed up, and didn't log in, the day they announced their own
email, just to stop someone else from being labeled dochawk.
Then at my reunion a couple of months ago, it came up that someone had
a page for our class. We went through a comedy of errors trying to
find an
On 12/11/2017 03:29 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
> I don't know, I'm one of the six people on earth who doesn't have or
want a Facebook account. But Ghostery blocks any unwanted junk that
comes in via a web page, and since you're viewing Facebook inside a web
page then it's worth
If nothing else, there is a ghostery browser for iOS; it is what I use
on the rare time I need one on my phone.
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscrib
I do use Ghostery on my workstations/laptops, but this is of course on my
iPhone. I'll see if there is any such thing. If it can't hook into Facebook
tho, I doubt it will work, and Facebook is unlikely to provide a way to block
ads as that is their bread and butter.
Bob S
> On Dec 11, 2017,
I don't know, I'm one of the six people on earth who doesn't have or
want a Facebook account. But Ghostery blocks any unwanted junk that
comes in via a web page, and since you're viewing Facebook inside a web
page then it's worth a try. Can't hurt.
Even if it doesn't work completely there, you
Do they have Ghostery for Facebook? I'm talking about facebook pages where you
click to read an article, and it takes you to a browser IN facebook where you
are lambasted with ads. Also seems the more you scroll, the more ads there are.
Bob S
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 13:47 , J. Landman Gay via
Hi Sean
The HTTPS redirect uri requirement does make things a little trickier. A quick
search indicates that a local HTTPS server is possible (Adobe’s Java SDK for
sign uses one). I would need to research on the feasibility of implementing
such a thing in LC though. At a minimum I suspect we wo
On 12/11/17 3:15 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
I find that the browser combination of AdBlockPlus and uninstalling
Flash does wonders. Of course, I also disabled third-party cookies and
have HTTPSEverywhere and PrivacyBadger installed.
Ghostery does most of this. I uninstalled everyt
On 12/11/2017 12:59 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
A very good point. I block sites on facebook all the time because while trying
to read an article, there are more ads than content, and I get so frustrated
because the ads are designed so that if I try to scroll, and the page shifts
(
You might place a keyboard shortcut in a library script or plugin to reset
the rect of the SE to your liking. Better than slogging through the msgs.
Craig
--
Sent from:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Revolution-User-f278306.html
___
A very good point. I block sites on facebook all the time because while trying
to read an article, there are more ads than content, and I get so frustrated
because the ads are designed so that if I try to scroll, and the page shifts
(and it will ALWAYS shift while scrolling) I end up clicking on
Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I've tried to get this discussion going before, and failed. So
> perhaps a crasser start:
>
> Is anyone actually making money from livecode app's advertising,
> either iOS or android?
>
> If so, how did you get it done, who did you use, etc.?
Good news: Roxio reported Ang
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
wrote:
>
> Point taken. Thanks - that was me typing without being sufficiently
> caffeinated.
set the detailed caffeination of Mark to "High. VERY high."
:)
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
_
I've tried to get this discussion going before, and failed. So
perhaps a crasser start:
Is anyone actually making money from livecode app's advertising,
either iOS or android?
If so, how did you get it done, who did you use, etc.?
All I have so far is that the folks that livecode supposedly se
On 11/29/2017 12:30 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
I downloaded 8.1.2 and performed the same test as above and the difference
was substantial. I’m on a different machine, but the times appear
consistent with the test I did on 7.x on the other one.
https://github.com/livecode/livecode/p
Hello,
thank you for your helpfull answers.
-> Richard Gaskin: syserr is 2, wrong adress
-> Mike Bonner: Standalone tries to save the datastack in folder Contents/MacOS
of the App-Package; I changed the folder to Resources/_MacOS and it worked ok.
Richard H.
__
Mark Waddingham wrote:
> In general, it is best for us to avoid introducing / making worse the
> whole function/property synergy as any function which has a property
> form reserves the name of the function - i.e. you can no longer use
> that as a property of an object (whether custom, or engine)
On 12/11/2017 08:59 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
No - see http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3210
Awesome.
My general feeling is that the english-like syntax *should* be:
the [detailed] files of folder
i.e. 'the files' is a property of a pseudo-folder object
P
On 2017-12-11 17:48, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
It *is* a step away from natural-language xtalk syntax though.
I take it the syntactic sugar of offering
"the detailed files of pFolder"
would fall under the dreaded category of synonyms?
No - see http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cg
On 12/11/2017 06:47 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
I added a second optional parameter to files/folders this morning:
get files(pFolder) -- the files
get files(pFolder, "detailed") -- the detailed files
It *is* a step away from natural-language xtalk syntax though.
I take i
Hi Mark,
> Am 11.12.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
> :
> On 2017-12-10 02:33, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote:
>> Hi Swami,
>>> Am 10.12.2017 um 02:25 schrieb Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
>>> :
>>> it was a huge step to do away with the defaultfolder r
On 2017-12-10 02:33, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Swami,
Am 10.12.2017 um 02:25 schrieb Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via
use-livecode :
it was a huge step to do away with the defaultfolder requirement to
get a file list
put files(somePath) is wonderful
but, "u" …we are still
Hi all
I’ve been doing some work for a client who is still using LC5.0.2 ?(because it
works and they don’t want to go to the subscription model) and needed to add in
functionality with Adobe echoSign (now just Adobe Sign™). This has changed from
a SOAP auth method over to OAuth2, rightly so. Th
Hi Monte,
Just edited the plist file and it works now.
Thanks!
groeten,
William
2017-12-11 4:24 GMT+01:00 Paul Hibbert via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>:
> Thank you for the quick response Monte, the fix works well!
>
> Paul
>
> > On 10 Dec 2017, at 13:36, Monte Goulding via
28 matches
Mail list logo
