Peculiar behavior
if I save a stack… after some work… touch the standalone settings… where the
iOS was off before, check it on, choose my profile and build, I will always get
a message that some "arm stuff" cannot be found..
when I run it a second time… it goes through…
This is doubling my tes
Richard,
Thanks for the advise. I agree with you on all counts. However, the computer
I am working with can’t be updated… it’s a older Mac Mini (2004). All I’ve
read says 10.6.8 is the latest OS it can support.
-Dan
> I'd wager that if you look through your Mac's crash logs you'd find
> r
Dan Friedman wrote:
> Ok, here’s a weird one... I make a standalone on my mac (LC Indy
> 8.1.1, OSX 10.12.1). Here’ the ENTIRE project:
>
> New Stack
> Add 1 button
> Set script of button to this:
>
> on mouseUp
>answer “This is a test."
> end mouseUp
>
> Now, build standalone. Everything
Ok, here’s a weird one... I make a standalone on my mac (LC Indy 8.1.1, OSX
10.12.1). Here’ the ENTIRE project:
New Stack
Add 1 button
Set script of button to this:
on mouseUp
answer “This is a test."
end mouseUp
Now, build standalone. Everything is fine. Runs on Mac running 10.6.8, run
Matt Maier wrote:
> Do you need the user to be able to interact with each named object
> individually through the TreeView widget? If not, maybe you can just
> replace the single object name with a list of all relevant objects in
> your preferred sort order. You'd still get a hierarchy of groups
One thing to note: at the moment (and future???), you cannot send compound
transactions from LiveCode to mySQL. I understand this to be a livecode
issue.
So
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
INSERT THIS;
SELECT THAT;
DO SOMETHING ELSE;
END TRANSACTION;
can be handled with a single query in livecode with
Do you need the user to be able to interact with each named object
individually through the TreeView widget? If not, maybe you can just
replace the single object name with a list of all relevant objects in your
preferred sort order. You'd still get a hierarchy of groups that way. You
could just "op
Tore Nilsen wrote:
> Could you build the initial array with the object names as keys, add
> the layer numbers as part of the information you store about each
> element, then sort the array by layer numbers and set the array of
> the tree view widget to the sorted array?
Ah, but arrays aren't so
Matt Maier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> I need a sort of object browser, and have been playing around with
>> the TreeView widget as a possible quick solution.
>>
>> Handy for many things, but being array-based it seems my options for
>> sorting are limited
Could you build the initial array with the object names as keys, add the layer
numbers as part of the information you store about each element, then sort the
array by layer numbers and set the array of the tree view widget to the sorted
array? Or am I missing something in your description here?
+1
> On Dec 10, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Dave Kilroy wrote:
>
> Well when I was a Visual Studio guy if you wanted any sort of a decent
> installer you had to use 3rd party software
>
> Making good Windows installers can be a big thing - and it used to be the
> market leader product for this (this is
I used rTree when I was trying to find a pre-built tree tool. It's pretty
good.
I think I actually got some code straight from the dev that wasn't posted
publicly. I haven't used it in a long time.
http://tapirsoft.on-rev.com/rtree/
As a side note, I just want to say that it's refreshing to see yo
Well when I was a Visual Studio guy if you wanted any sort of a decent
installer you had to use 3rd party software
Making good Windows installers can be a big thing - and it used to be the
market leader product for this (this is about 8 years ago now) was
InstallShield and that was PRICEY! Like a
I need a sort of object browser, and have been playing around with the
TreeView widget as a possible quick solution.
Handy for many things, but being array-based it seems my options for
sorting are limited.
Like the IDE's Object Browser, I need a sort order which reflects
physical layering o
Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> This is kind of a basic functionality of a paid product . . .
Perhaps. Which other commercial multi-platform development tools
include an installer-maker?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
15 matches
Mail list logo
