> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 12:44 pm, Phil Davis wrote:
>
> function app_helperAppPath pAppName
>dispatch function ( "_helperAppPath_" & the platform ) to me with pAppName
>return the result
> end app_helperAppPath
>
>
> function _helperAppPath_MacOS pAppName
>-- Mac-specific app path dis
Actually here's another situation where I've used 'dispatch' simply to
avoid a 'do'. But I could as easily use 'send' to get the job done:
function app_helperAppPath pAppName
dispatch function ( "_helperAppPath_" & the platform ) to me with
pAppName
return the result
end app_helperApp
> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 12:23 pm, Phil Davis wrote:
>
> Use case: You use 'dispatch' as a coding style preference.
>
> (That's all I could come up with.)
;-)
Actually thinking on it I can imagine a use case but it fails if you are
wanting to dispatch a private handler:
dispatch “SomethingOverr
Use case: You use 'dispatch' as a coding style preference.
(That's all I could come up with.)
Phil
On 11/8/16 5:00 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 9 Nov. 2016, at 11:52 am, Phil Davis wrote:
You also can't execute a private handler with the "dispatch" command.
I guess that’s true but what use
> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 11:52 am, Phil Davis wrote:
>
> You also can't execute a private handler with the "dispatch" command.
I guess that’s true but what use case is there for dispatch within the same
script?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@
You also can't execute a private handler with the "dispatch" command.
Phil Davis
On 11/8/16 4:44 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 9 Nov. 2016, at 11:31 am, James Hale wrote:
Can someone explain why making a handler private speeds up a script?
Private handlers are called directly rather than gi
> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 11:31 am, James Hale wrote:
>
> Can someone explain why making a handler private speeds up a script?
Private handlers are called directly rather than giving all the frontscripts a
chance to handle them.
> Should I be making more of my handlers private?
If you only ever n
In a reply to a post on loop speed Mark made this aside...
> the aData array (also making sure explodeRow is private will help too)
Can someone explain why making a handler private speeds up a script?
Should I be making more of my handlers private?
Really intrigued.
James
__
Ralph’s idea was good though, you could export snapshot from a card window
that’s the real size. But yes, scaling up is what I’ve done as well.
One thing to be wary of is having complex splash screens. You will find that if
you support every required size you could reach 30 MB of app space, befo
Thanks Ralph, Phil, Colin
So the interim solution (until I upgrade my systems to get access to iPad Pro
Simulator) is to take a Retina screenshot and scale up (this is to satisfy that
AppStore requirements) and hope that's good enough...! :-)
cheers
Alan
On 9 Nov 2016, at 4:03 am,
wrote:
What I'm seeing is if I unlock the PI, then I ask for a PI on something
else (say an object on a separate card), the unlocked PI becomes up locked
with the new object. I did think about the location being the same, so I
checked that, but no joy. Same token: If I lock the PI, it doesn't always
s
Tore.
Did you notice the difference in Craig's post?
We can't use
'from point A to the points of'
but either 'from point A to point B' or 'to the points of'.
Hermann
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to s
'Lock moves' or 'set lockmoves to true'
works here as it should with LC 8.1.1 and 9.0.0-dp1 on MacOS 10.12.1.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
prefer
I've noticed that inspector windows stack perfectly on top of each other,
and the 'new' inspector falls directly on top of the locked one, giving the
visual feedback of being replaced, when actually the locked one is behind
the new one. Some UI designs make sure 'new' windows will be offset
slightl
Mike Kerner wrote:
> Any idea how to make the lock on the property inspector stick? If I
> select the property inspector for an object and hit the lock, it does
> not seem to stick. So for example, pick A. Unlock PI. Pick B. PI
> is now locked. Unlock PI. Repeat - PI lock doesn't seem to sti
Since the original thread was hijacked,
Any idea how to make the lock on the property inspector stick? If I select
the property inspector for an object and hit the lock, it does not seem to
stick. So for example, pick A. Unlock PI. Pick B. PI is now locked.
Unlock PI. Repeat - PI lock doesn't
The easiest way, without a menu item, is from the message box: "clone this
card".
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On November 8, 2016 11:36:12 AM Marc Siskin wrote:
Ralph,
Does typing “Copy thi
Ralph,
In a button use either of these statements:
copy card “ymCardToCopy" of this stack to this stack
copy card "ymCardToCopy" of this to stack "DemoStack” ---assuming DemoStack
stack is open
be well,
randy
Randy Hengst
www.classroomFocusedSoftware.com
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Ra
Sorry, I had a "hot key nightmare" and sent it with the wrong subject line. I
resent with correct subject.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of
Thanks for hijacking my thread, guys. GET YOUR OWN THREAD!
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Marc Siskin wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> Does typing “Copy this card to this stack” work in the message box?
>
> Marc
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Ralph DiMola mailto:rdim...@evergreeninfo.net>> wrote:
>
> How
Ralph,
Does typing “Copy this card to this stack” work in the message box?
Marc
On Nov 8, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Ralph DiMola
mailto:rdim...@evergreeninfo.net>> wrote:
How does one duplicate a card in v8? I can't seem to select a card in the
IDE. "duplicate card" is no longer displayed. I guess thi
Yes, this is what does not work in 8.1.0. I've tried it both on my Macbook and
on my iMac, and the second movement only start once the first is finished.
I should probably look for a bug report/file a bug report if no other report
exists.
Tore
> 8. nov. 2016 kl. 17.16 skrev dunbarx :
>
> Hi.
>
How does one duplicate a card in v8? I can't seem to select a card in the
IDE. "duplicate card" is no longer displayed. I guess this have been
replaced by the "duplicate" text. If I select the card in the property
inspector the copy and duplicate edit options are grayed out. Also after
selecting th
How does one duplicate a card in v8? I can't seem to select a card in the
IDE. "duplicate card" is no longer displayed. I guess this have been
replaced by the "duplicate" text. If I select the card in the property
inspector the copy and duplicate edit options are grayed out. Also after
selecting th
Any idea how to make the lock on the property inspector stick? If I select
the property inspector for an object and hit the lock, it does not seem to
stick. So for example, pick A. Unlock PI. Pick B. PI is now locked.
Unlock PI. Repeat - PI lock doesn't seem to stick.
--
On the first day, Go
I guess I haven't had to work any text properties in dg's in 8, because I
don't see how to change either the header or the body text props.
--
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few
I made no reference to stack ID; I'm familiar with its role as a
container for the ID incrementer.
The short name of a stack is not the only distinguishing attribute. Its
file path is also available.
Indeed, topstack returns the path as a part of the stack reference, but
apparently does not
Hi.
Do you mean something like this:
on mouseUp
set lockmoves to true
move grc "Oval1" to the points of grc 3 in 350 milliseconds without waiting
move grc "Oval2" to the points of grc 4 in 2 seconds without waiting
set lockmoves to false
end mouseUp
Works fine here in v 6.7, so I assume the iss
I create all my screen shots in the IDE. I resize the screen for each
resolution and then export a screen shot to a png. The status bar is missing
but one click export of all resolutions makes up for that.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Or
The screen size is bigger, and Apple now expect you to provide at least one
screenshot in that size. I did it for a recent App update using the iPad Pro
simulator in Xcode 8 on iOS 10.11.6 on a retina iMac. The previous time I did
it for an App update I took a standard iPad retina screenshot and
As he said, the stack ID is not really it's ID. In other words LC does not use
the stack ID to identify it. Think of the stack ID as "the next ID to be
assigned to a new object" much like SQL maintains a value in a master table of
some sort with the next unique ID for each unique numerical colum
In LC 8.1.0 on a Mac with macOS 10.12, I have encountered some problems when
trying to move several objects simultaneously. The script below works as
expected:
on mouseUp
set lockmoves to true
move grc "Oval1" from 50,60 to 1200,60 in 350 milliseconds without waiting
move grc "Oval2" from 50,
All iPad apps work on iPad Pro. What would you achieve if you could simulate
it, that you can’t already do?
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:50 AM, Alan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies Peter, Stephen, Terry... but I guess I didn't explain
> myself well enough.
>
> The problem is that, AFAIK, the iPa
In the simulator the File menu only has one entry, Save Screen Shot. Maybe that
would do?
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:22 AM, stephen barncard
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:21 PM, stephen barncard <
> stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote:
>
>> can't you just take a screenshot on the iPa
Very interesting discussion! I'm still curious though. Since the op
already takes the json based file and turns it into an array ( probably
using an existing json library.) Since this step is already done, and the
array esists, is there an actual benefit to then breaking that array into
separate
Hi Mark,
There's a reason why I haven't posted the code of explodeRow... but I'm sure
it _could_ be efficient!
Thanks for reminding me about split with one delimiter - I never use that.
I think when I first encountered it I was so annoyed by the thought that it
was pointless, because what I
Apologies - I clicked the wrong button in my email client and managed to
send a partially composed message. Here is the correct version!
On 2016-11-08 12:48, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
The point is that in my first pattern, I have outside the loop
assigned column (item) indices to named variables (b
On 2016-11-08 12:48, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
The point is that in my first pattern, I have outside the loop
assigned column (item) indices to named variables (based on the items
of the first, header, row). In the loop LC then has to locate the
indexed items in an individual data row.
In the first
On 07/11/2016 18:05, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I wouldn't care to hazard a guess as to the relative speed of
"aData[x]" versus "item x": but it's the overhead of the function
which creates the array on that I don't want to pay *on every row*.
The function call itself has very small overheard. Wh
Thanks for the replies Peter, Stephen, Terry... but I guess I didn't explain
myself well enough.
The problem is that, AFAIK, the iPad Pro isn't supported with OSX 10.9.5? i.e.
I can't install the required xCode that will provide the necessary simulator
and/or support for building for iPad Pro
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> But maybe Bramanathaswami has some special use case?
Assuming that is the case then 'do' is the answer and you'll find an
example in the Dictionary under the 'local' command; the last example.
Unfortunately the example is a bit of negative lea
41 matches
Mail list logo
