Re: Exiting Browser Widget

Hmmm… I don’t have control over the JS attached to a youtube page… makes for an interesting challenge On 5/26/16, 7:43 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of David Bovill" wrote: >You would need to get javascript to call a Livecode handler. > >So that means doing something like: > >set the javaScriptH

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

Hi All, How difficult could be to leverage audio (.ogg) and video (webM) playback from Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF) within LiveCode 8? Using current LC8, How could we do this: 1) play a webM video from script and LC8 just create an instance of RevBrowserCEF and put in the card a brows

Re: the keys of the dragData?

Thanks everyone. My mistake. the keys of the dragdata does actually work. Interestingly the keys of (the dragdata) also works - but with different results :) On 27 May 2016 at 16:54, Ali Lloyd wrote: > You should also be able to do > > *put* the keys of (the dragData) into dragKeys > > > On Fr

Re: Alternative interfaces

I went lateral today: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=27328&p=143042#p143042 Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preference

Re: the keys of the dragData?

You should also be able to do > *put* the keys of (the dragData) into dragKeys On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM Matt Maier wrote: > I think it should be "the keys of the dragData of something" or just "the > keys of dragData". > On May 27, 2016 17:58, "David Bovill" wrote: > > This isn't workin

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

On 5/27/2016 9:52 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > think everyone on the team has made it clear that this work in > response to Apple's deprecation of Quicktime or Windows would be > specific to Windows. > > But in all fairness, I can appreciate the longing to have video and > audio playback restored on

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

On 27/05/2016 16:01, Mark Wieder wrote: On 05/27/2016 03:11 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: On 27/05/2016 06:27, Mark Wieder wrote: On 05/26/2016 09:11 AM, Heather Laine wrote: Folks, A fine blog post from Iain MacPhail regarding his recent work on the LiveCode Player Object: Dang! I was really h

Re: the keys of the dragData?

I think it should be "the keys of the dragData of something" or just "the keys of dragData". On May 27, 2016 17:58, "David Bovill" wrote: This isn't working for me in 8.1: > *put* the keys of the dragData into dragKeys Is this a bug or am I doing something silly? __

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

On 05/27/2016 03:11 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: On 27/05/2016 06:27, Mark Wieder wrote: On 05/26/2016 09:11 AM, Heather Laine wrote: Folks, A fine blog post from Iain MacPhail regarding his recent work on the LiveCode Player Object: Dang! I was really hoping this was going to work on linux.

Re: the keys of the dragData?

Hi David, The dragData isn't an array but a property. By putting the dragData into a variable, you convert it into an array and you'll be able to get the keys. Kind regards, Mark Schonewille http://economy-x-talk.com https://www.facebook.com/marksch Buy the most extensive book on the LiveCod

the keys of the dragData?

This isn't working for me in 8.1: > *put* the keys of the dragData into dragKeys Is this a bug or am I doing something silly? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your su

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

On 27/05/2016 14:52, Richard Gaskin wrote: In the meantime, with the focus of the current work indeed on Windows, it may be helpful to review this thread describing some of the issues people have found on Windows (yes, I've asked them to submit bug reports, but relative newcomers are not yet acc

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

Peter TB Brett wrote: > On 27/05/2016 06:27, Mark Wieder wrote: >> Dang! >> I was really hoping this was going to work on linux. > > I'm really curious what made you think that that was at all likely to > happen. I thought that Kevin and I had been _very_ clear, from the > point at which this wo

Re: OT Livecode and Intego Virus Barrier

Not entirely related, but on some of our Win machines, every time I build a new win executable with LC, Norton complains and blocks it. I then have to tell Norton on those machines that the the executable is, indeed trustworthy. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Matthias Rebbe < matthias_livecode_

Re: OT Livecode and Intego Virus Barrier

I filed a bug now Bug 17748 http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17748 Feel free to add a comment. > Am 27.05.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Peter TB Brett : > > On 27/05/2016 09:19, Matthia

AW: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

Good news indeed! Thank you Tiemo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von Heather Laine Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2016 18:12 An: How to use LiveCode Betreff: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved Folks, A fine blog post

Re: OT Livecode and Intego Virus Barrier

On 27/05/2016 09:19, Matthias Rebbe wrote: so there´s no need for me to file a bug, right? Or should i report it? I do not to bother the team with unnecessary things. Maybe it would be worth filing a bug report about the tools log grows continuously rather than being kept to a sensible maxim

Re: [blog] Quicktime Dependency Solved

On 27/05/2016 06:27, Mark Wieder wrote: On 05/26/2016 09:11 AM, Heather Laine wrote: Folks, A fine blog post from Iain MacPhail regarding his recent work on the LiveCode Player Object: Dang! I was really hoping this was going to work on linux. I'm really curious what made you think that tha

Re: OT Livecode and Intego Virus Barrier

Fraser, so there´s no need for me to file a bug, right? Or should i report it? I do not to bother the team with unnecessary things. Matthias > Am 27.05.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Fraser Gordon : > > On 27/05/16 02:39, Lyn Teyla wrote: >> 2. The method used by LiveCode to write to LiveCodeToolsLo

Re: OT Livecode and Intego Virus Barrier

On 27/05/16 02:39, Lyn Teyla wrote: 2. The method used by LiveCode to write to LiveCodeToolsLog.txt (presumably multiple times) might not be ideal. Could be a "write to file" vs "put into url" issue. Better yet, perhaps the writing to this log file should not be performed by default, unless a