I have no doubt! LOL
Cheers,
Erik
On 07:42, Mon, May 16, 2016 Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> > On 16 May 2016, at 3:40 PM, Erik Beugelaar wrote:
> >
> > for me it
> > means Android because it has always been neglected to offer an easy to
> use
> > SDK for Android.
>
> Nobody is looking forward to t
> On 16 May 2016, at 3:40 PM, Erik Beugelaar wrote:
>
> for me it
> means Android because it has always been neglected to offer an easy to use
> SDK for Android.
Nobody is looking forward to that more than me Erik I assure you ;-)
Cheers
Monte
___
u
Correct but this thread started with Infinite LiveCode as a subject to
express the need to accomplish a very important issue: connect to native
API's of different platforms via widgets LCB development and esp. for me it
means Android because it has always been neglected to offer an easy to use
SDK
It does have an effect however resources are limited. One thing I've suggested
is we start indicating whether there are resources available to work on the
request in a reasonable timeframe. It could be a feature or a bug that is only
an edge case that might not come to the top of the todo list.
Mike Kerner wrote
> I agree with Monte. The nice thing about the bug db is everyone can see
> it, and everyone can comment on it. If you have a feature "request" that
> you are promoting, you can just fire off a message over here with the
> number, and we can all pile on with our "YEAH, EDINBURGH
Started my love of programming with a course in Fortran IV in college about
1972. Borrowed my older brother’s Commadore Vic 20 and learned Basic from its
documentation. Later purchased a Mac SE from my brother that came with the full
version of HyperCard. Still going strong, but with LiveCode no
I agree with Monte. The nice thing about the bug db is everyone can see
it, and everyone can comment on it. If you have a feature "request" that
you are promoting, you can just fire off a message over here with the
number, and we can all pile on with our "YEAH, EDINBURGH!" comments until
it's res
On 5/15/2016 6:07 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
> See and add comments here:
>
> http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17654
>
>
>> But IMHO a group of objects should be just that,
>>
>> Not a group which also wears a hat and a dress
>
This is a known behavior of the default settings
This works now I fixed my "blooper" (put instead of "set"… one caveat
When dynamically relocating the controls of the group. This process seems to
relayer them.
So if you set the background as the last in the list… the other controls are
underneath..
So, order matters here:
on setBottomNavto
See and add comments here:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17654
>But IMHO a group of objects should be just that,
>
>Not a group which also wears a hat and a dress
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit t
Uhoh you said the 'C' word - now Heather's going to weigh in...
Dr. Hawkins wrote
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:59 AM, RM <
> richmondmathewson@
> > wrote:
>
>> I'd just like to state that I'm sorry I made a political statement
>> a few messages back (pace Donald Trump).
>>
>
> On a lighter n
Talk about buggy - my last posting had so many typos I'm doing it again:
--
Yeah that inspector is buggy.
I think the 'Key:' and 'Value:' properties are only for when you are using
the inspector to add or update elements to it
If you click the "+ Add new element" button at the top of the
Yeah that inspector is buggy.
I think this 'Key:' and 'Value:' properties are only for when you are using
the inspector to add or update elements to it - although the inspector still
has rough edges...
If you click the "+ Add new element" button at the top of the 'Arraydata'
property field, then
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:59 AM, RM wrote:
> I'd just like to state that I'm sorry I made a political statement
> a few messages back (pace Donald Trump).
>
On a lighter note . . . are you aware that Trump wants to ban the sale of
shredded cheese?
Yes, he's going to make America grate again .
Ah, sorry Sid I should have clarified enhancement request also (it's the same
form and site as for bugs). If you think something is missing then search the
issue database for an enhancement request and if you don't see it write up what
you need.
Cheers
Monte
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 May 2
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 5/15/2016 9:18 AM, Rick Harrison wrote:
>> HTML5 still being in the early experimental stage which
>> also has no means of communicating with outside files
>> or databases kills any potential usefulness of it’s
>> abilities for me.
>
> Isn't that a browser restriction t
On 5/15/2016 9:18 AM, Rick Harrison wrote:
HTML5 still being in the early experimental stage which
also has no means of communicating with outside files
or databases kills any potential usefulness of it’s
abilities for me.
Isn't that a browser restriction to prevent malware from reading and
wr
I am sorry, but it is NOT always about a "bug report".
While I concede the internet is oft used for pure negativity, a discussion
of features and capabilities - especially those missing - is about facts.
It is both proper and should be allowed.
To express a fact and a concern is valid. To say some
I saw that 8.0 was announced, so I downloaded it to have a look.
I see there is a tree widget. However, looking at an instance of this
object through its property inspector, I see the inspector has a "key"
field and a "value" field. I would expect these to display/edit the
key/values of the widg
Hi Herman,
Yes, I understand now that everything gets downloaded
with this HTML5 deployment including my app.
That being the case, I find the icon to be annoying, but
I’m glad to here that my future (already paid for) license
will get rid of the thing.
HTML5 still being in the early experimental
But IMHO a group of objects should be just that,
Not a group which also wears a hat and a dress
If I want my group to wear a hat ( have a border)
Or wear A dress ( have margins) then let us do that on our own
I will enter a feature change request
BR
( from my mobile )
On Sat, May 14, 2016
Set. Not
Put
Right
Oh duh! I think I need to get away from the code for a few days and go mill
firewood for our camp out!
Br
( from my mobile )
_
From: Dave Kilroy
mailto:d...@applicationinsight.com>>
Hi, instead of
put the loc of widget "queue-content" to 315,
Hi, instead of
put the loc of widget "queue-content" to 315,390
try
set the loc of widget "queue-content" to 315,390
-
"The first 90% of the task takes 90% of the time, and the last 10% takes the
other 90% of the time."
Peter M. Brigham
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-
23 matches
Mail list logo