On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> Is it possible Bill A. is unaware of LiveCode?
Impossible. Bill and his wife sat next to me at the San Jose conference.
Although most of the time he couldn't stop talking about his iPad Keyboard
thing he just got.
Also I didn't know who he was and though
> On 2 May 2016, at 9:23 AM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
>
> For example, would it be possible to create a version of that allows building
> IOS standalones under commercial license, but nothing else. Then such a User
> could build IOS standalones (non-GPL), other standalones (under GPL), they
> coul
He attended and spoke at the LC conference in San Jose. He had written most of
PhotoCard in ObjectiveC and was looking at the cross-platform possibilities of
LC. Since then, I don’t know his plan or interest. I was surprised as well that
he didn’t mention LC in the interview.
.Jerry
> On May 1,
Richard.
Is it possible Bill A. is unaware of LiveCode? He intimated that the current
"Hypercard" is a program called "iBooks Author".
Really?
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaskin
To: How to use LiveCode
Sent: Sat, Apr 30, 2016 12:17 pm
Subject: [OT] Atkinson Intervie
From 2013…
http://www.slideshare.net/techahead/html5-vs-native-app-battle-infographics
But still interesting. The “code once run anywhere” vs “Native dev” is the
underlying driving force behind HMTL5 app dev.
So if you can sell LiveCode by marketing that same line… you can target an
entire
Any market researchers out there who could actually begin to answer this?
Bill
William Prothero
http://ed.earthednet.org
> On May 1, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
>
> No, it's not an Apple problem - they're not losing any money over it, and
> they're certainly not losing any sleep ove
No, it's not an Apple problem - they're not losing any money over it,
and they're certainly not losing any sleep over it.
I think it's a Livecode Ltd problem (for the reasons described in the
earlier post), though it is partly caused by Apple.
Yeah. it would be great if Livecode Ltd could use
> On 2 May 2016, at 8:46 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
> wrote:
>
> Forgive me, Monte.. But I think this is an extremely “blinkered” regressive
> point of view that seriously limits the possible future user base. The
> “middle ground” is not small at all. The digital revolution is *exploding
On 4/30/16, 11:41 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Monte Goulding"
wrote:
>In the end you are either making or intending to make money with the platform
>so $1-2k isn't a deal breaker or you aren't making money so GPL isn't a deal
>breaker. The middle ground is therefore small and from a cost-b
I've got white-blond hair, a white mustache, and black eyebrows. 67yo. Can't
afford to retire. Not a professional coder, but at it for over 25 years on the
side.
I just hope that all of us aren't over 40. Is LC going to disappear with the
boomers?
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
O
I think you should be able to use the screenPixelScale and/or systemPixelScale.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media UX/UI Design
> On May 1, 2016, at 12:12 PM, David Beck wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know of a way to determine if a stack is being displayed on a
> high r
Yet another display of HEX (and optional decimal base).
Read one day the date and time in HEX.
Raspberry Pi stacks collection #13
= MACadressTime.livecode (HEX display of time)
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?p=100500#p100500
(works on Mac/Win/Linux/Raspi, watch your monospaced display f
Hello,
Does anybody know of a way to determine if a stack is being displayed on a
high resolution monitor? It seems like there should definitely be a
function for this purpose but I can not find one. Is this even
theoretically possible or is there some contour of the universe that makes
this impos
'Grey hair
that mantle of glory,
the only item of respect
that does not incite envy' ...:-)
> Subject: Re: Beeing a developer after 40
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> From: richmondmathew...@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 20:49:38 +0300
>
> I'm getting there, slowly: my beard is about 50
I'm getting there, slowly: my beard is about 50% white now: Hey, wait,
that must mean I'm 50% of a programmer!
There's hope for me yet.
Richmond.
On 1.05.2016 20:25, stephen barncard wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, wrote:
I don't feel so old anymore. I thought everyone on this li
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, wrote:
> I don't feel so old anymore. I thought everyone on this list, going back
> to the HC list, was a teenager or worse. Shows what cultural influences can
> do to you.
>
>
obviously one hasn't been to a LC event lately. More white hair and
ponytails on old
NO, and I'm glad I didn't as I had a lot of stimulating fun working out how
to do things myself . . . and will have fairly sadistic fun in the Summer
when I get teenagers who think they know all about computers to
work out how to do it.
Richmond.
On 1.05.2016 20:02, Jerry Jensen wrote:
Have you
No.
On 1.05.2016 20:02, Jerry Jensen wrote:
Have you seen the baseConvert() function? In the dictionary.
On May 1, 2016, at 8:58 AM, RM wrote:
I have now included a "catcher so that when you try to decode a Hexadecimal
number
of the form "123WP2A" it will catch you out and point out that th
Have you seen the baseConvert() function? In the dictionary.
> On May 1, 2016, at 8:58 AM, RM wrote:
>
> I have now included a "catcher so that when you try to decode a Hexadecimal
> number
> of the form "123WP2A" it will catch you out and point out that that isn't a
> Hex number.
>
> This ma
I have now included a "catcher so that when you try to decode a
Hexadecimal number
of the form "123WP2A" it will catch you out and point out that that
isn't a Hex number.
This may seem trivial, but I can think of at least one kid I know who
has serious problems counting
in Base 16 (to say not
Yes, I suppose it would be, but it isn't an issue as converting one
Decimal to Hex per second is faster
than my fingers can move.
Richmond.
On 1.05.2016 15:37, Monte Goulding wrote:
If speed is an issue then integer division would be faster than real division
then trunc.
Sent from my iPhone
To see whats going on, do this..
on mouseUp
-- Local undeclared un-initialized variables evaluate as string values.
myvar is "myvar"
-- so the value returned is the name of the variable Meaning the engine
doesn't see it as a variable
-- and sees it as a string.
answer myVar
put 1 into my
Hello again,
Please take a long at the following script :
on mouseUp
if myVar is empty then
answer 1
else
answer 0
end if
put 1 into myArray[1]
put 1 into myArray[2]
if myArray[3] is empty then
answer 1
else
answer 0
end if
if myArray1[3] is e
My point is only made from the view of the so called "Hobbyist brigade" and
the "Poor boys" who have dreams to buy a house maybe later from the sales
;-)
Btw I have nothing against paying for a licence. I own a team licence of
Appcelerator Studio which costs me $3.250/year so that is not my point.
Hmm... If you believe in your idea and business plan then make the investment
just like if you believe the property market will go up then buy a house.
There's risk in getting out of bed in the morning but it doesn't outweigh the
benefits ;-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 May 2016, at 10:11 PM, E
If speed is an issue then integer division would be faster than real division
then trunc.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 May 2016, at 9:01 PM, RM wrote:
>
> I have already found a way using 'trunc'
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runre
Hello list
localNames and variableNames return an internal error 500 on LC server 6.1.0
while they work on desktop LC.
Anyone has more info on this ?
Thanks
jbv
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subs
I agree but if you have a brilliant idea for an iOS app and you believe it
will generate money in future you need audiance. And for iOS the only
common way is the AppStore to present your app to buy or offer it as free
download to turn it later if succesfull in a payed version ot subscription
model
Thanks Dick and Monte,
but I'm sure that isn't what Mrs Whitaker used :)
I have already found a way using 'trunc'.
Richmond.
On 1.05.2016 13:19, Monte Goulding wrote:
div
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
I've just bought myself some Leopard-skin posing briefs;
if you don't believe me; go and have a look:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=27163&p=141874#p141874
Love, "I'm just too much" Richmond.
On 30.04.2016 18:18, RM wrote:
That's me, the ultimate Hex-object of 2016.
However, a
div
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 May 2016, at 7:59 PM, RM wrote:
>
> It must be somewhere on the sunny side of 40 years since
> I did anything like this: probably with Mrs Whitaker when I was
> about 10 (1972) . . . and she, poor woman, has probably been
> gathered to the Great Primary Maths Clas
> On May 1, 2016, at 2:59 AM, RM wrote:
>
> BUT, what is the non-mod bit?
13492571 div 16
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://li
Hey; My old friend Nelly the Elephant:
trunc
R.
On 1.05.2016 13:08, RM wrote:
And before somebody mentions 'numberFormat" it turns 843285.6875 into
843286
because it rounds the 0.6875 up: fioch!
R.
On 1.05.2016 12:59, RM wrote:
It must be somewhere on the sunny side of 40 years since
I did
And before somebody mentions 'numberFormat" it turns 843285.6875 into 843286
because it rounds the 0.6875 up: fioch!
R.
On 1.05.2016 12:59, RM wrote:
It must be somewhere on the sunny side of 40 years since
I did anything like this: probably with Mrs Whitaker when I was
about 10 (1972) . . . an
It must be somewhere on the sunny side of 40 years since
I did anything like this: probably with Mrs Whitaker when I was
about 10 (1972) . . . and she, poor woman, has probably been
gathered to the Great Primary Maths Classroom in the sky.
So: here I am mucking around trying to convert Decimal nu
I very much doubt the subscription model will go away any time soon. It may be
constructive to determine a price point that hobby developers requiring
proprietary distribution might be prepared to pay but I think the issue you
will bump into is that's a small market so the price point would need
On 1.05.2016 11:45, Erik Beugelaar wrote:
I have a feeling that this thread will end up in a very long one again...
I suppose it will.
I am not going to write any more on this as my initial message said all
I have to say on it.
R.
The only point I will make is the fact to deploy only o
Is it possible for Livecode to do Mathematics in Hexadecimal?
Or, am I going to have to shove Hex numbers through a Hex-to-Decimal
meat grinder,
do the Math(s) and then shove the result through a Decimal-to-Hex meat
grinder . . .
. . . all going to be a pain-in-the-b quite frankly (especially
I have a feeling that this thread will end up in a very long one again...
The only point I will make is the fact to deploy only on IOS then $999 is a
lot for the so called "Hobby brigade" or the "Poor boys".
A lot about this issue has already been said on
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?
Please do not mention my roof: I was up there after a few really violent
April showers messing around with a blow torch
on the tar-paper - and I'm scared of heights.
Nobody is going to spin me the vast amount required to RENT Livecode
Commercial.
AND I really DON'T want to RENT anything: I wa
40 matches
Mail list logo
