Mark Wieder wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 06:38 PM, Lyn Teyla wrote:
>
>> Using a HTTPS connection ensures that the PDF file is transmitted securely.
>
> Uh, sorry, no.
> HTTPS by itself will (mostly) guarantee that you are connected to the server
> you think you're connecting to. There's no encryptio
Just as an idea:
A few times I used this one (it's basically AES-128).
There are also examples that basically worked for me.
So: Not really an experience but the few times it worked.
https://github.com/defuse/php-encryption
___
use-livecode mailing list
I think we weren’t planning on using Acrobat at all. It would be an unencrypted
PDF that is encrypted on a server, saved locally with the same encryption, and
only viewable by the logged in user as a local file,
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 10:55 PM, stephen barncard
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016
On 03/04/2016 06:38 PM, Lyn Teyla wrote:
Using a HTTPS connection ensures that the PDF file is transmitted securely.
Uh, sorry, no.
HTTPS by itself will (mostly) guarantee that you are connected to the
server you think you're connecting to. There's no encryption unless you
enforce it yoursel
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Colin Holgate
wrote:
> I found out more info, the local copy of the PDF needs to be encrypted
> too. This isn’t what it is, but imagine it’s top-secret, that even other
> users of your computer shouldn’t see, I need to download the file and just
> let you see it, w
I found out more info, the local copy of the PDF needs to be encrypted too.
This isn’t what it is, but imagine it’s top-secret, that even other users of
your computer shouldn’t see, I need to download the file and just let you see
it, with some sort of password entry to unlock it.
> On Mar 4,
> Colin H. wrote:
> A PDF is online somewhere...
Of course, if you don't insist on HTML5 (despite the subject)
you could also think about simpler solutions available in php
which is much faster than LC server.
Others here (Peter H.?) will have several ready made solutions
for that.
__
Colin Holgate wrote:
> Is LiveCode required in what you say?
You can use LiveCode Server (or any other server-side language) to perform
those tasks.
> Does the PDF travel securely?
Using a HTTPS connection ensures that the PDF file is transmitted securely.
Lyn
_
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Is LiveCode required in what you say?
Does the PDF travel securely?
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Lyn Teyla wrote:
>
> Colin Holgate wrote:
>
>> A PDF is online somewhere. A logged in user asks for it, and the server
>> encrypts it before sending over, u
@Mark: confirmed... I'm getting selections OK *until* I open on particular
stack.. which turns on acceleratedRendering...*then* selection disappears.
@Devin re: LC 8.. aum-yes... love it... big step forward, enjoying
participating by hitting head on walls and sending descriptions of bruises --
Colin Holgate wrote:
> A PDF is online somewhere. A logged in user asks for it, and the server
> encrypts it before sending over, using some sort of key that was in the
> query. On receiving the data, the client side would have to unencrypted it,
> and show it as the original PDF in a browser.
Forgot to add the link where you can try which functions work (or not) in dp-15
HTML5 standalones:
Because on-rev is moving tonight, you could use this one:
http://hyperhh.org/html5/TerminalZero-8.0.0-dp-15X.html
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-liveco
Hopefully the exception key would help. Only the user would know how to
unencrypt the image.
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:07 PM, [-hh] wrote:
>
> Currently the ask dialog is the **only** way to communicate
> with a HTML5 standalone.
> You simply have to manage, that your imagedata can pass the
> dia
Currently the ask dialog is the **only** way to communicate
with a HTML5 standalone.
You simply have to manage, that your imagedata can pass the
dialog (no CR). And be aware that everybody can read your
script, but that shouldn't matter. The rest works "as usual".
The copy/paste via "ask" mechanism
Yes. There are other options, but I was hoping that LiveCode could do it in an
easier way. At worse, the encryption could be as simple as Base64.
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 6:48 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> I wouldn't expect imageData to be an issue in HTML5 but encryption seems like
> a stretch a
I wouldn't expect imageData to be an issue in HTML5 but encryption seems like a
stretch at this stage. Does it need to be in a browser?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 Mar 2016, at 8:35 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
> I’ve been tasked with a problem to solve, and I think I can use any tool to
> do it
Smashing! "set the style of me to palette" did it, on Linux.
Thank you so much.
Richmond.
On 4.03.2016 22:44, Terry Judd wrote:
Try Œpalette me¹ or Œset the style of me to palette¹ - these both work for
me.
Terry...
On 5/03/2016 7:18 am, "use-livecode on behalf of RM"
wrote:
What am I do
On 4.03.2016 23:20, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 3/4/2016 2:18 PM, RM wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Why does this NOT palettise my stack:
on preOpenStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end preOpenStack
nor this:
on openStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end openStack
They work here. Try the co
On Mar 3, 2016, at 2:30 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 3/3/2016 8:22 AM, Mike Kerner wrote:
>> Slightly off-the-subject, but for usability, command-9 and command-0 are a
>> PITA to reach for me, as a right-hander, when my right is usually on the
>> trackpad or mouse.
>
> I changed this years ago
I’ve been tasked with a problem to solve, and I think I can use any tool to do
it. LiveCode could be a good choice. Here’s what’s needed:
A PDF is online somewhere. A logged in user asks for it, and the server
encrypts it before sending over, using some sort of key that was in the query.
On rec
Be careful using mouseMove. It gets sent along with messages like mouseDown
regardless of whether or not the mouse is moving. So make sure the logic in
it is idempotent (produces the same result when called multiple times).
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Terry Judd
wrote:
> Hi Mark - you proba
On 3/4/2016 2:18 PM, RM wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Why does this NOT palettise my stack:
on preOpenStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end preOpenStack
nor this:
on openStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end openStack
They work here. Try the command later in the opening sequence, or send
Try Œpalette me¹ or Œset the style of me to palette¹ - these both work for
me.
Terry...
On 5/03/2016 7:18 am, "use-livecode on behalf of RM"
wrote:
>What am I doing wrong?
>
>Why does this NOT palettise my stack:
>
>on preOpenStack
>palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
>end preOpenStack
>
>nor this:
>
Hi Mark - you probably want to use a mouseMove handler rather than
mouseWithin. Try starting off with something simple like this...
on mouseMove
put word 2 of the mouseLine into n
set the textColor of line 1 to -1 of me to empty
set the textColor of line n of me to blue
end mouseMove
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> (Sorry Heather! I’m sending this message again from the ‘proper’ account..)
>
> I’m not sure how long it has been around, but I have just discovered the
> ‘mousewhithin’ message combined with the mouseline() function… Awesome! So,
> for
What am I doing wrong?
Why does this NOT palettise my stack:
on preOpenStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end preOpenStack
nor this:
on openStack
palette stack "ARGEEBEE"
end openStack
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.ru
(Sorry Heather! I’m sending this message again from the ‘proper’ account..)
I’m not sure how long it has been around, but I have just discovered the
‘mousewhithin’ message combined with the mouseline() function… Awesome! So,
for those of you who don’t know, the ‘mousewithin’ message is sent to
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-04 16:07, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
>> Suddenly any object I select has not selection handles and is not
>> hilited. Double clicking will invoke the inspector, I can see the name
>> of the object, but it is not selected.
On 2016-03-04 16:07, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
Suddenly any object I select has not selection handles and is not
hilited. Double clicking will invoke the inspector, I can see the name
of the object, but it is not selected. Actually it is, because I can
move it around, change colors etc.
Thanks Mark!!
Sorry to take up everyone’s time on that, but good to know I guess.
Tim
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-04 16:12, Tim Bleiler wrote:
>> Thanks Mark,
>> I submitted the file in bug report 17067.
>> Tim
>
> Okay - so - the problem with that fi
Thanks, Peter,
I'm planning on implementing code that will email me notifications, with some
error source info. Will this kind of error information be available in my app?
My apps get pretty complicated and I want to know when users encounter bugs in
my software. I know there is a flag that can
Personally I'd just save your stack in '7' format and get on with things
in version 7.
Perhaps not the best idea to do 'serious' work with a Developer Preview
- sorry.
Richmond.
On 4.03.2016 17:07, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
Suddenly any object I select has not selection handles and
On 2016-03-04 16:12, Tim Bleiler wrote:
Thanks Mark,
I submitted the file in bug report 17067.
Tim
Okay - so - the problem with that file is that your text editor has
decided to be nice and convert normal double-quote " to appropriate
paired quotes. Your file has:
script “MyTest”
Rat
On Mar 2, 2016, at 5:29 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> The final script for your button should look like this:
>
> on mouseUp
> put "tell application " & quote & "Finder" & quote & cr & \
> "activate" & cr & \
> "open document file " & quote & "test.workflow" & quote & " of folder
> " & quote & "Document
Suddenly any object I select has not selection handles and is not hilited.
Double clicking will invoke the inspector, I can see the name of the object,
but it is not selected. Actually it is, because I can move it around, change
colors etc.
Even after rebooting LC this behavior now persists. A
Thanks Mark,
I submitted the file in bug report 17067.
Tim
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 5:38 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-03 20:45, Tim Bleiler wrote:
>> It probably doesn’t matter much as long as it’s made clear what
>> encodings are allowed. I would guess most users taking advantage of
Thanks Jim,
Since you aren’t having the problem I tried a couple of other things. First, I
had been dragging the file to the Livecode icon in the dock, so I tried opening
it through the menu as you had done but I still get a file is not a stack
message. I then shut my whole system down and trie
On Mar 1, 2016, at 8:07 PM, William Prothero wrote:
> 89,2654,1
>
> 69,2654,1,graphic id 74731 of group id 69783 of card id 1002 of stack
> "/Users/prothero/Oceanography Projects/LiveCode-RunRev Projects/PT_Explorer
> Projects/EarthExplorer_CurrentWkg/appStacks/datastacks/Map Display.livecode"
On 4.03.2016 12:48, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
> I wonder why the 32 bit Linux builds of the 6 series won't
> run on my 64 bit Xubuntu even though I have multi-arch
> installed?
Because, despite the name, multi-arch doesn't really do the job of
supporting multiple architectures. I w
Yes i had a strange bounce back of last post I sent early morning, so I
re-posted as suggested. thanks for the hint. Robert.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Overnight-list-issues-tp4701997p4702007.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list
I shall too, for myself, just apply the rules stated directly or indirectly
by livecode. These were not, at all, as crystal clear as it seemed.
And that is precisely why I took time to research, clarify and exchange
here.
[ Actually, there was a last issue raised, still un-cleared : I still do n
Richmond wrote:
> I wonder why the 32 bit Linux builds of the 6 series won't
> run on my 64 bit Xubuntu even though I have multi-arch
> installed?
Because, despite the name, multi-arch doesn't really do the job of
supporting multiple architectures. I was spending a lot of time in the
Ubuntu fo
On 2016-03-03 20:45, Tim Bleiler wrote:
It probably doesn’t matter much as long as it’s made clear what
encodings are allowed. I would guess most users taking advantage of
this feature could live with that. Casual users may be confused
however, because most of us don’t give much thought to such d
Heather wrote:
"Folks, we had a brief issue with the list delivery last night/early this
morning. If you sent a post and it has not appeared - check your bounces. You may
need to send it again.
Apologies for the inconvenience, all up and running again now.
Regards,
Heather"
Credit where cre
On 2016-03-03 19:43, Robert Mann wrote:
I guess you checked that the first line is not empty and that there is
no
space before the first line?
"script" must be at the beginning of first line. Engine is very pick at
that.
And sometimes the engine/ide adds another line at top, leading to 2
line
Heather wrote:
"
Folks, we had a brief issue with the list delivery last night/early this
morning. If you sent a post and it has not appeared - check your bounces. You
may need to send it again.
Apologies for the inconvenience, all up and running again now.
Regards,
Heather"
>> Richmond M.
On 2016-03-03 20:33, Richard Gaskin wrote:
As for the Inspector, it may be time to consider a property sheet
rather than manually arranged control layouts. VB and Toolbook use
prop sheets and I love having absolutely every property available in
one place. Helps with learning too, so folks can se
On 2016-03-04 02:49, Richard Gaskin wrote:
AFAIK this has always been how it works. In fact I discussed this
with Dr. Raney shortly after if was implemented, and in his view it
works as spec'd: when you mouseDown anywhere in browser mode it
doesn't do marquee select, so when an individual objec
On 2016-03-03 19:48, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I have a routine that includes:
set the defaultStack to tValidStackName
revert
...and instead of reverting the specified stack it reverts the topmost
toplevel stack.
Why?
Because that is the way it has always been...
I suspect the reasoning was
Folks, we had a brief issue with the list delivery last night/early this
morning. If you sent a post and it has not appeared - check your bounces. You
may need to send it again.
Apologies for the inconvenience, all up and running again now.
Regards,
Heather
Heather Laine
Customer Services Man
Just checking we're all here today...
Heather Laine
Customer Services Manager
LiveCode Ltd
www.livecode.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
pre
51 matches
Mail list logo
