Re: sorting words ?

2015-12-10 Thread Kay C Lan
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote: > > The "word" chunk is not loosely implemented - it does precisely what it is > meant to do. > > Which of course is the reason why the sort container command has no problem if you sort by word on the right side of the equation - 'by word x

Re: Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread William Prothero
Bug reported. Bill > On Dec 10, 2015, at 2:29 PM, William Prothero wrote: > > I’m really loving the widgets and new version 8. However, the first thing I > did was make a new stack and fiddle with the widgets. Then, when I tried to > close and remove the stack from memory from the file menu, i

Re: Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread William Prothero
I’m really loving the widgets and new version 8. However, the first thing I did was make a new stack and fiddle with the widgets. Then, when I tried to close and remove the stack from memory from the file menu, it gave me the “really?” dialog, but didn’t remove the stack. It still showed. So, s

$332 to go on Feature Exchange

2015-12-10 Thread Malte Brill
Just pushed it over the line. :-) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: $332 to go on Feature Exchange

2015-12-10 Thread Walt Brown
I tossed in $100. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, stephen barncard < stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote: > To show team spirit.. I just pledged $50.00 - let's get a few more... > > -- > Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Heather Lain

Re: $332 to go on Feature Exchange

2015-12-10 Thread stephen barncard
To show team spirit.. I just pledged $50.00 - let's get a few more... -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Heather Laine wrote: > and 50 minutes left. Anyone care to jump in here? Surely we can do another > $332 and get nicely preserved fo

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread dunbarx
Here is the link: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=25132&hilit=routines+for+very Craig -Original Message- From: Peter TB Brett To: How to use LiveCode Sent: Thu, Dec 10, 2015 1:47 pm Subject: Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values? On 2015-12-10 17:54,

$332 to go on Feature Exchange

2015-12-10 Thread Heather Laine
and 50 minutes left. Anyone care to jump in here? Surely we can do another $332 and get nicely preserved formatting on find and replace added to LiveCode's feature set? Anyone? Warm Regards, Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread dunbarx
There are handlers developed to handle numbers of any length. See the forums. "Routines for very large numbers" Craig -Original Message- From: Peter TB Brett To: How to use LiveCode Sent: Thu, Dec 10, 2015 1:47 pm Subject: Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values? On 2

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
Looks like the largest decimal number that can be represented then is 4.50359962737E+15, or 450359962737 Bob S > On Dec 10, 2015, at 10:46 , Peter TB Brett wrote: > > On 2015-12-10 17:54, Geoff Canyon wrote: >> LiveCode works in 64 bit numbers, so why does >> put 100 * 100

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread Peter TB Brett
On 2015-12-10 17:54, Geoff Canyon wrote: LiveCode works in 64 bit numbers, so why does put 100 * 100 result in 1303786028427003666890752 which is close to the right answer, instead of some 18 digit value? When numbers are too large to repr

Re: Probably a pointless question about using sort to search..

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
If the keys are numerical, you can just drop it into a datagrid and sort on the column you want. Bob S On Dec 10, 2015, at 09:47 , Peter Brigham mailto:pmb...@gmail.com>> wrote: Someone on this list at some point posted an array sorting function that might be relevant here for some applicatio

Re: Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread Peter Haworth
Thanks Mark, I can confirm that it is there now. Pete Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote: > On 2015-12-10 19:

Re: Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Waddingham
On 2015-12-10 19:21, Peter Haworth wrote: I've found two bugs already but the QCC does not have an option to specify DP11 in the version dropdown. Thanks for the heads up - there should now be a DP11 option. Warmest Regards, Mark. -- Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
Correction. The web calculator had a maximum which I exceeded. The binary equivalent of 1E40 is 111010110001100101001000111110101110010100101. That is 133 bits. That far exceeds the limits of Livecode. Bob

Re: Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread Peter Haworth
I've found two bugs already but the QCC does not have an option to specify DP11 in the version dropdown. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:2

Re: Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
Because the binary equivalent of a 40 digit decimal number is NOT 40 bits. It is many more bits. For example the binary equivalent of 1 (17 digits) is 1010101 (27 digits). You are thinking of each decimal digit as a binary bit. Bob S > On Dec 10, 2015, at

Why aren't large numbers limited to 64 bit values?

2015-12-10 Thread Geoff Canyon
LiveCode works in 64 bit numbers, so why does put 100 * 100 result in 1303786028427003666890752 which is close to the right answer, instead of some 18 digit value? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-l

Re: Probably a pointless question about using sort to search..

2015-12-10 Thread Peter Brigham
Someone on this list at some point posted an array sorting function that might be relevant here for some applications. See below. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig "Why is the alphabet in that order? Is it because of that song?" -- Steven

Re: Search in arrays

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
Sounds like data returned from a database query. SQL Yoga returns query data in this format. What I do is I populate a datagrid with the returned array data, then I use a selectionChanged handler in the data grid script to populate whatever I want. In my case I have distinct fields named "fld" &

Re: Step through libURL

2015-12-10 Thread Phil Davis
Nice! No more revLibUrl cloning for me. Phil On 12/10/15 3:08 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote: Hi Dan, The global gRevDevelopment controls whether breakpoints trigger in scripts in stacks with rev-prefixed names. If you do put true into gRevDevelopment in the message box, the breakpoints should trigger. A

Re: Step through libURL

2015-12-10 Thread J. Landman Gay
It can also be changed in the variable pane of the message box if you want a UI for it. On December 10, 2015 10:46:07 AM CST, Mark Wieder wrote: >On 12/10/2015 03:08 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> The global gRevDevelopment controls whether breakpoints trigger in >scripts >> in stacks with

Re: Step through libURL

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Wieder
On 12/10/2015 03:08 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote: Hi Dan, The global gRevDevelopment controls whether breakpoints trigger in scripts in stacks with rev-prefixed names. If you do put true into gRevDevelopment in the message box, the breakpoints should trigger. And just to be clear, in the messagebox type

Re: Probably a pointless question about using sort to search..

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
You can get the keys of an array and sort them before accessing them. The array itself cannot be sorted, and there would be no benefit to doing so that I can see. Bob S On Dec 9, 2015, at 07:56 , Mike Bonner mailto:bonnm...@gmail.com>> wrote: I was just thinking how useful sort could be to f

Re: [OT] Free pre-loaders

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Sneidar
Yes but with a caveat. Since Livecode is a single threaded process, if any activity is going on like your own scripts running, the animated GIF will pause until Livecode is idle. This makes animated GIFs a bad choice for progress indicators. Bob S On Dec 9, 2015, at 14:07 , William Prothero

Release 8.0 DP 11

2015-12-10 Thread Ali Lloyd
Dear list members, We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 8.0 DP 11. Warning: this is not a stable release. Please ensure you back up your stacks before testing them. *Release contents* *HTML 5 Enhancements* The following have been added for HTML 5 standalones in DP 11 - ability to

Re: Feature exchange - find and replace ending today

2015-12-10 Thread Heather Laine
Replying to myself... just wanted to say wow, thanks folks - we're s close now! Just $707 short, 82% funded, and 6 hours to go. Can we do that last little burst? Hopefully... Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com > On 10 Dec 2015, at 10:18, Heath

Re: Step through libURL

2015-12-10 Thread Ali Lloyd
Hi Dan, The global gRevDevelopment controls whether breakpoints trigger in scripts in stacks with rev-prefixed names. If you do put true into gRevDevelopment in the message box, the breakpoints should trigger. Ali On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:06 AM Phil Davis wrote: > Hi Dan, > > In 6.7 I was able

Feature exchange - find and replace ending today

2015-12-10 Thread Heather Laine
Dear List Folks, Our new and improved Find and Replace project is ending in a few hours on the Feature Exchange. We're close to success, so if you want to see this feature happen, please do go and back it now: https://livecode.com/project/find-replace/

Re: sorting words ?

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Waddingham
On 2015-12-09 22:27, dunb...@aol.com wrote: The "word" chunk has always been loosely implemented, in that it can hardly be considered a truly delimited chunk at all, like an item or a line is. Even though it seems to have been included in the "family" of chunks. The "word" chunk is not loosely