Hi
You could try - https://import.io/
Simon
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Mike Kerner
wrote:
> anyone write a site scraper? Feel like sharing it so I don't have to write
> it?
>
> --
> On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
> On the second day, God created the oceans.
> On
On 09/10/2015 04:28 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
On 09/09/2015 12:06 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
I'm sorry you felt it was passive-aggressively not accepted. It was
meant
neither as passive-agressively , nor not accepted.
Well, that was intended to be a flippant remark, the the posting
subject should h
On 09/09/2015 11:25 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Stephen MacLean
wrote:
I mention this most every time after an Apple event, but it’s becoming
more and more relevant each time… LiveCode support?
How ready is LC for iOS9? It’s coming in a week. iOS 8 broke a lot of my
Monte Goulding wrote:
> The issue with submodules is just a workflow thing. You’ve got to
> remember to commit changes to the submodule before you commit to
> the main repo because the commit on the main repo contains a
> reference to the commit on the submodule. In general submodules
> that you
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 11:36 am, Monte Goulding
> wrote:
>
>> As an aside, I believe Monte's lcvcs system involves a binary diff mechanism
>> for comparing two stacks.
>
> No there’s no binary diff in lcvcs although it wouldn’t be hard to build
> something that created a repo, export the origi
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 1:06 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> > I also saw the email notice on the fact that we can expect a lot more
> > submodules in the future to deal with widgets. Not something I'm
> > looking forward to.
>
> What are your concerns?
The issue with submodules is just a workflow
Mark Wieder wrote:
> I also saw the email notice on the fact that we can expect a lot more
> submodules in the future to deal with widgets. Not something I'm
> looking forward to.
What are your concerns?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, M
anyone write a site scraper? Feel like sharing it so I don't have to write
it?
--
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
and did a little diving.
And God said, "This is g
This is excellent!
Thank you and please let us
know when you post more
examples.
John Balgenorth
On Sep 8, 2015, at 11:35 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just taking a quick break from my holiday to let you know that I wrote
> another LiveCode Builder-centric blog post. This one's a
Hi All,
With v8 and beyond, is there any Embeded LiveCode in the future or is that
vision terminated?
Wondering.
--
Ta.
Mark Rauterkus m...@rauterkus.com
PPS Summer Dreamers' Swim & Water Polo Camp Executive Coach
Varsity Boys Swim Coach, Pittsburgh Obama Academy
Recent Head Water Polo C
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Stephen MacLean
> wrote:
>
>> I mention this most every time after an Apple event, but it’s becoming
>> more and more relevant each time… LiveCode support?
>>
>> How ready is LC for iOS9? It’s coming in a wee
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 11:23 am, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> As an aside, I believe Monte's lcvcs system involves a binary diff mechanism
> for comparing two stacks.
No there’s no binary diff in lcvcs although it wouldn’t be hard to build
something that created a repo, export the original stack file
On 09/09/2015 06:25 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
Script only stacks work in 6. Not sure which version they were introduced but
but in 6.7.7 there’s a bucket load of script only stacks in the IDE for
libraries.
Huh. So they are. At least as far back as 6.7.5 anyway.
Somehow I missed that fact.
On 09/09/2015 12:06 AM, Ali Lloyd wrote:
I'm sorry you felt it was passive-aggressively not accepted. It was meant
neither as passive-agressively , nor not accepted.
Well, that was intended to be a flippant remark, the the posting subject
should have reinforced that.
Seems like I struck a n
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 11:07 am, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> It appears to be written as a script-only stack for LC8. Since I ran this in
> LC6.7.5, I just copied the script minus the first line into the card script.
> That almost ran properly, only causing a harmless error on the final line of
> th
Multitasking is already present, and split screen layout is in dev preview
3.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/ma
On 09/09/2015 01:10 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
I think you should perhaps look at the title of your post for an example
of passive-aggressiveness, rather than Ali's perfectly measured and
appropriate response to your pull request :)
In regards to binary stackfile contributions - I'm sorry b
On 09/09/2015 05:20 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
Hi Folks
Some of you may know that all the references to RunRev and Runtime revolution
are being cleaned out and the github account has changed from runrev to
livecode. This means all our clones are broken so to save everyone some time I
made a st
Hi Folks
Some of you may know that all the references to RunRev and Runtime revolution
are being cleaned out and the github account has changed from runrev to
livecode. This means all our clones are broken so to save everyone some time I
made a stack that will fix it for you. Here it is:
https
Greetings!
Has anyone successfully created a Facebook App that will run with Andre's
FacebookLib? I can't seem to get the Facebook App configured correctly. I
get errors and unsuccessful results. I had a few eMails with Andre, and he
suspects that the Facebook App is setup incorrectly. An
Will non-apple apps be able to do the multi-tasking/split screen? That
would be nice...
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Roger Eller
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Stephen MacLean
> wrote:
>
> > I mention this most every time after an Apple event, but it’s becoming
> > more and more r
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Stephen MacLean
wrote:
> I mention this most every time after an Apple event, but it’s becoming
> more and more relevant each time… LiveCode support?
>
> How ready is LC for iOS9? It’s coming in a week. iOS 8 broke a lot of my
> stuff, would have been nice to be ab
I mention this most every time after an Apple event, but it’s becoming more and
more relevant each time… LiveCode support?
How ready is LC for iOS9? It’s coming in a week. iOS 8 broke a lot of my stuff,
would have been nice to be able to test ahead of time.
AppleTV OS. New, based on iOS. Will t
On 9/9/2015 2:32 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Paul Dupuis wrote:
> > However, I have run into a puzzler. Under Windows 8 (and Win 7) when I
> > set the effective rect of a stack to 0,0,x,y or set the effective
> > topLeft of a stack to 0,0, that stack is NOT taking into account the
> > wider window
Thanks Paul, good to know.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 9/9/15, 11:43 AM, "Paul Dupuis" wrote:
>Scott,
>
>See the dictionary entry for "rectangle". There is a specific note that,
>as of LC6, the effective rect of a stack includes its decorations and
Scott,
See the dictionary entry for "rectangle". There is a specific note that,
as of LC6, the effective rect of a stack includes its decorations and
window borders and is also settable. IMHO it was one of the best new
features of LC6+. What I did nto realize, but discovered this week was
that you
Paul Dupuis wrote:
> However, I have run into a puzzler. Under Windows 8 (and Win 7) when I
> set the effective rect of a stack to 0,0,x,y or set the effective
> topLeft of a stack to 0,0, that stack is NOT taking into account the
> wider window borders of Windows 7 and 8 and is positioning the st
This sounds like there's a legacy flag on those older stacks but I'm not sure
what it might be.
If you file a bug report and attach one of the stacks or send one to Hanson
we'll take a look.
Mark.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 19:11, Paul Dupuis wrote:
>
> I have an application (m
Dumb comment/question on my part: I always thought the effective keyword
was for reading only -- didn't think it was settable. From the docs:
The effective keyword is implemented internally as a property and appears
in the propertyNames. However, it cannot be used as a prop in an
expression, nor
I have an application (main stack + many substacks + several external
stacks) that is ancient (originally built in HyperCard, ported to
Supercard, ported to Metacard, and on up to LiveCode 6.7.6.
I was working on redoing some of the legacy screen layout code today -
taking advantage of 'the workin
Hi Thierry,
I did as you suggested but not seeing any difference with code folding,
still just commands and functions are foldable.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:04 AM James Hale wrote:
> Thierry wrote:
> >
> > Replace the key 'Function Pattern' with the one below
> > and you might have a surprise wi
Thierry wrote:
>
> Replace the key 'Function Pattern' with the one below
> and you might have a surprise with code folding..
Well I did and it works in BBEdit. Not sure what the surprise is though, unless
you have something in mind with the two unused named patterns.
I also used it in a modifie
Hi Jose,
Off the top of my head, this would probably look something like the
following in LC:
post tPostString to
url("https://AC0afb9e5c70c0fde47904a9a6ff:e6a1bdc2a7a7484d6cdc96e@api*twilio*com/2010-04-01/Accounts/AC0afb9e5c70c0fde47904a9a6ff/Messages.json";)
Where tPostString contains t
On 09/09/2015 01:41 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
The survey asked if one were likely to attend; but as the choice of
where one could attend was restricted the results would be
like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Err - no - we had a shortlist of areas in which we know we could
afford to run a confer
Hi all - can someone help me convert the following?
curl -X POST
'https://api*twilio*com/2010-04-01/Accounts/AC0afb9e5c70c0fde47904a9a6ff/Messages.json'
\
--data-urlencode 'To=5034554562' \
--data-urlencode 'From=+1212022183' \
--data-urlencode 'Body=test message' \
-u AC0afb9e5c70c0fde47904a9a6f
> Indeed, we could have given a list of an arbitrary number of places -
> Munich, Shanghai, Outer Hebrides, *Tristan da Cunha*, Nuaha...
LiveCode Conference to be held in Edinburgh*!
*of the seven seas
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:41 AM Mark Waddingham wrote:
> > The survey asked if one w
The survey asked if one were likely to attend; but as the choice of
where one could attend was restricted the results would be
like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Err - no - we had a shortlist of areas in which we know we could afford
to run a conference based on the data that we have (i.e. get en
On 09/09/2015 11:30 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
I do think, even if only as a sop to those of us (like myself) who get
fed up how RunRev, for all their ballyhoo about China and so forth,
do seem to give the impression that they don't really seem to think
outside a North Atlantic box, the survey wo
A conference requires a lot of work, planning, and inevitably tons
of problem solving. Trust me.
Flights are one expense but lodging can be far far greater. Negotiating
with a hotel is usually a good idea.
European Perspective - it would currently cost me £50 to take Ryanair from
Malta to Edinbur
On 2015-09-03 14:28, Roger Eller wrote:
That's great news! Thank you.
After a bit of to-ing and fro-ing (the Win32 path behavior is quite
subtle...) we've got a patch ready for this. It's currently scheduled
for 6.7.8-rc-1:
https://github.com/runrev/livecode/pull/2832
Warmest Regards,
Ma
Hi,
Replace the key 'Function Pattern' with the one below
and you might have a surprise with code folding..
Function Pattern
Tested successfully but very quickly with TextWrangler 4.5.12 ( the latest)
I have another option, but let comments arise before going further..
Regard
Well said Mark!
Graham
> On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:30, Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
>> I do think, even if only as a sop to those of us (like myself) who get
>> fed up how RunRev, for all their ballyhoo about China and so forth,
>> do seem to give the impression that they don't really seem to think
>>
I do think, even if only as a sop to those of us (like myself) who get
fed up how RunRev, for all their ballyhoo about China and so forth,
do seem to give the impression that they don't really seem to think
outside a North Atlantic box, the survey would have looked a bit
more friendly if it had le
On 2015-09-08 21:53, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=8404b344b09103bf489dd8a9a&id=cbaad904da&e=30cf6c38b4
Thanks. The form won't accept input in Chrome, and since I didn't
receive an invitation to participate in the survey I'll wait until
it's ready a
On 2015-09-09 05:38, Mark Wieder wrote:
4. My pull request was passive-aggressively not accepted because
"there's no way to review the changes".
I think you should perhaps look at the title of your post for an example
of passive-aggressiveness, rather than Ali's perfectly measured and
appropr
> I know nothing about writing externals for Livecode on Windows.
> Are there any tutorials available?
http://newsletters.livecode.com/november/issue13/newsletter5.php
http://newsletters.livecode.com/november/issue14/newsletter3.php
http://newsletters.livecode.com/october/issue34/newsletter1.p
I'm sorry you felt it was passive-aggressively not accepted. It was meant
neither as passive-agressively , nor not accepted.
Indeed I have used almost the exact same wording in the past:
https://github.com/runrev/livecode-ide/pull/9
In that case it was a one-line bugfix in a stack that was the s
47 matches
Mail list logo
