What is PDF/A?
It’s a TLA I’m unfamiliar with.
Kee
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> Actually, put in PDF/A for #3--without it, I will have no choice but to use
> another platform, as it will be mandatory for ECF court filing in a couple
> of years.
>
___
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mike Kerner
> wrote:
>
>> Wow, that's surprising. So what does your list look like - say for the
>> top
>> 5? Why is multithreading so important to you?
>>
>
> Secure Postgres support
> Multithreading or sla
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mike Kerner
wrote:
> Wow, that's surprising. So what does your list look like - say for the top
> 5? Why is multithreading so important to you?
>
Secure Postgres support
Multithreading or slave processes
Fixing the (*#^%*(m show-stopping bugs in the IDE (shado
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
>
> My brain is too fried to figure out why this should be so my plan is to
> just always encode/decode stuff when importing/displaying.
>
Sorry for the slow reply, but I note your other post on your tentative move
to LC 7 and the gotchas alo
J. Landman Gay wrote:
From what you've seen, it sounds like the default in 7.0 is to encode
the new way, and the dictionary is misleading. Richard G. mentioned on
the list that the default was the new encoding.
To clarify, the new method is used where it exists. :)
It works very much like sta
Right, I was talking about bitmaps. All screen exports are some kind of bitmap.
If I need a higher resolution I open the file in Graphic Converter or Photoshop
and increase the resolution.
The PDF idea is interesting, I hadn't thought of that.
On February 19, 2015 4:55:35 PM CST, Graham Samue
Sorry, final word on this subject.
I loaded the stack, set the stackfileversion to 7.0 and saved the stack.
Quit LC 7 and run again. Try to open the stack - spinning beachball of
death, have to force quit.
Done have any more time to waste on this so back to good old reliable 6.6.
On Thu Feb 19
OK, well this is getting really frustrating.
I changed my code to check the version and issue the 7 version of
arrayencode with the extra parm with a "do" command.
I made a copy of the stack for use in LC7 and opened it in LC7. Now I get
an error on the arrayencode because the stackfile version
David¹s right - PDF export is definitely the way to go. It¹s even good for
bitmaps if you use high res images that have been sized down and locked
within LC.
Terry...
On 20/02/2015 9:56 am, "Graham Samuel" wrote:
>Ha! Sounds promising. Midnight here, I¹ll investigate tomorrow. Thanks
>
>Graham
Wow, that's surprising. So what does your list look like - say for the top
5? Why is multithreading so important to you?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Mike Kerner
> wrote:
>
> > If you were prioritizing features for LC, would this be o
Ha! Sounds promising. Midnight here, I’ll investigate tomorrow. Thanks
Graham
> On 19 Feb 2015, at 23:33, dfepst...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> For high resolution export of vectors: open printing to pdf
>
> David Epstein
___
use-livecode mailing li
Sorry Jacque, I don’t understand. Suppose I have say a filled rectangle (‘draw'
not ‘paint', thus a vector image). When I export it, I think this ends up as a
bitmap with the resolution of the screen it was displayed in while in LC. Is
this what you’re seeing? What about a group containing say v
Thanks Eric. I guess I'll have to go the "do" route. Your bug report is
13406, I just added a comment to it.
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 2:22:53 PM Eric Corbett
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I forgot about that fact. I just checked some code in a library we use and
> indeed the arrayEncode for version 7 is
For high resolution export of vectors: open printing to pdf
David Epstein
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Mike Kerner
wrote:
> If you were prioritizing features for LC, would this be one of your top 5?
> It might make my top 10, but I don't know if it would be in my top 5.
>
I can't see it any lower than my top 2 (the other of which would be
postgres ssl support).
Hi Peter,
I forgot about that fact. I just checked some code in a library we use and
indeed the arrayEncode for version 7 is wrapped in a do statement.
I agree about the behavior. Mark W. made some comments to a bug report I
submitted explaining the current functionality but I can not find it.
Ho Eric,
Spoke too soon. Your code wont compile in versions prior to 7 because of
the extra parameter. I guess I could compile it in 7 but that would mean I
would have to compile that script in 7 every time I wanted to make a change
and there's a lot of handlers in it so high probability of chang
Thanks Eric and Jacque. I entered QCC report 14639. I altered my code to
do as you suggest Eric.
I wonder how this affects how an array variable is stored in a custom
property? As I understand it, the variable is automatically array encoded
if you do something like "set the cArray of me to tArr
One of the "work arounds" isn't really, its kind of a standard thing. A
game loop. Loop, do these things, do those things, update the screen, loop
again. For your "trek to earth" game, this would probably be sufficient.
Rather than waiting for an arrow key event, one of the loop steps would be
to
On 2/19/2015 2:49 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
The
dictionary indicates that if the new parameter, version, is not present
then arrays are encoded the old way. None of my calls include the new
parameter so not sure how they ended up being inaccessible in pre7 versions.
From what you've seen, it so
On 2/19/2015 10:50 AM, Graham Samuel wrote:
Is there any way to export a vector image? What I’m actually trying
to do is to export a screenshot that can have a higher resolution
than that of the screen, for printing and so on. Other apps can do
this, in effect (I mean they can have enlargement an
Additionally,
The dictionary may be a bit inaccurate. In LC 7, if there is no version,
arrayEncode uses the encoding for the version you are on, LC 7 encoding. So, if
LC 8 has different encoding than 7, LC 8 will use LC 8 encoding when no version
is specified.
Eric
On Feb 19, 2015, at 12:49 P
I think what you will have to do is this:
Check the LC version;
if it’s >= 7 then
arrayEncode(tData,6) — force the engine to use the old arrayEncoding
else
arrayEncode(tData) — older versions can not have the extra parameter
end if
LiveCode 7 will be smart enough to decode the array either way.
Thanks Eric, yes that does indeed help. However, I'm still confused. The
dictionary indicates that if the new parameter, version, is not present
then arrays are encoded the old way. None of my calls include the new
parameter so not sure how they ended up being inaccessible in pre7 versions.
I g
Not sure if this helps, but LiveCode 7 uses a different arrayEncoding than
previous version due to Unicode. Check the dictionary on how to use arrayEncode
in 7 to be able to decode in an earlier version.
Eric
On Feb 19, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> I've been careful to create
Joseba,
on which on-rev server is your account hosted? Diesel, Tio, Pancake or Jasmine?
My accounts on the servers canary, pancake and jasmine are working.
The on-rev status page at http://on-rev.com/support/server-status/ does not
show any malfunction.
But if your website is not working then
I've been careful to create separate versions of my stack files and
Livecode Preferences folder for use when running LC 7. However, it seems
there other issues with compatibility.
I save the preferences for my application in a file in the
/Library/Application Support folder with the following sta
Is there problems in On-Rev
Our website does not work since yesterday!!!
Someone else??
Un saludo.
Joseba
(jagu...@telur.es)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage you
Got a question I’m hoping someone can answer. I’ve done some research, but
can’t find what I’m looking for.
With LC 6.7.2, we gained 64-bit support for iOS apps. It seems to include
32-bit support as well, since I can install and run an app on my 1st Gen iPad
mini running iOS 8.1.3. However, we
Richmond wrote:
> I wonder WHY Livecode cannot do two things at once . . .
There is a difference between concurrency and parallelism which is
useful here because LC currently provides a limited form of concurrency
for some operations but delivers true parallelism only in the most
recent versi
Well, for anyone who's ever made an application
multitasking/multithreading, they'll tell you that there is all sorts of
extra complication involved in making it work, and if you've ever written
anything for a multithreading environment, it is definitely a lot of extra
work (it's worth it, IMHO, bu
That's a quote from another posting . . .
this might be the rock on which Livecode founders.
Other languages can do two, or more, things at once . . . I am either
too out of touch
with other computer languages, or I don't know enough about how computer
languages
talk to computers (which, de fa
AFAICS when one does ‘export snapshot’, the result is a bitmap even though the
original object or group may have been a vector image or made up of vector
images. At least that’s what I’ve seen from experimenting with the ‘export’
features of LC
Is there any way to export a vector image? What I’
Datagrids… GOOD!
Bob S
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 24:47 , BNig wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I ran into the same problem and figured that acessing the field and ask for
> formattedWidth is slow.
>
> So I tried to minimize that.
>
> I took each tab delimited item an stuffed it into an array. For each co
> On 18 Feb 2015, at 01:52, Alex Tweedly wrote:
>
> If the problem is that LC is just too slow, and the required calculations
> continuously or consistently take more time than is elapsed (i.e. we just
> keep getting further and further behind), then the problem is performance,
> not how/when
Thanks Mike,
you can load the field with 5000 lines worth of data via the Helper stack ->
Examples -> choose 5000 -> click button "fill with n lines of random data",
then move the lines by moving the dividers and then control-click into the
field.
This triggers the recalculation of the column widt
On 19/02/15 03:31, Bob Warren wrote:
A few days back I finished doing a few minor corrections to my Unicode
"File/Folder/Picture Choosers" for Windows and Linux, and declared
them "stable". If you download them, please test them well before
distributing them in any way, to make absolutely sure
Wow. Nice Bernd.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:47 AM, BNig wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I ran into the same problem and figured that acessing the field and ask for
> formattedWidth is slow.
>
> So I tried to minimize that.
>
> I took each tab delimited item an stuffed it into an array. For each column
> one
Hi Dan,
I ran into the same problem and figured that acessing the field and ask for
formattedWidth is slow.
So I tried to minimize that.
I took each tab delimited item an stuffed it into an array. For each column
one key.
You end up with each key holding the data of one column worth of data
Th
39 matches
Mail list logo
