Re: Inhibit mouse Events possible?

2014-07-04 Thread William Prothero
Mark: What about a transparent graphic with: on mouseDown checkoption end mouseDown on mouseUp checkoption end mouseUp —Other mouse events could be added on checkoption if the option key is down then hide me end if end check option Best, Bill On

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Peter M. Brigham
On Jul 4, 2014, at 3:14 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Luddites unite! "The future ain't what it used to be." -- Yogi Berra -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig ___ use-livecode mailing list use-live

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Jacque- Friday, July 4, 2014, 12:14:14 PM, you wrote: > He's just being...progressive. Luddites unite! Hey! It was *your* idea in the first place. -- -Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret.

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 7/4/2014, 1:49 PM, Richmond wrote: On 04/07/14 21:13, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Friday, July 4, 2014, 10:46:47 AM, you wrote: Should we really limit the language based on "most popular usage?" If so then I'd like to remove all the long forms of various terms and use only the synonyms that

Re: OT: Collaborative Diagramming Software

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
Pencil Project is pretty groovy as well: http://pencil.evolus.vn/Default.html Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists

Re: OT: Collaborative Diagramming Software

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 03/07/14 22:26, Brahmanathswami wrote: Surprising that draw.io gets so little press. Free for up to 500 users with unlimited docs... made by http://www.jgraph.com/... which is a pretty advanced company... Personally I'm not very keen on something that requires an internet connexion; even

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 21:13, Mark Wieder wrote: Jacque- Friday, July 4, 2014, 10:46:47 AM, you wrote: Should we really limit the language based on "most popular usage?" If so then I'd like to remove all the long forms of various terms and use only the synonyms that I use the most. "BackgroundColor" is t

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Jacque- Friday, July 4, 2014, 10:46:47 AM, you wrote: > Should we really limit the language based on "most popular usage?" If so > then I'd like to remove all the long forms of various terms and use only > the synonyms that I use the most. "BackgroundColor" is too long and I > think we should dit

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Richmond- Friday, July 4, 2014, 10:53:00 AM, you wrote: > Backwards compatibility is a good thing: As a generic statement, I think that's arguable (as in "yeah, I know it's broken and stupid but now we can't fix it because someone somewhere might be relying on the current behavior"). > So; perh

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 7/4/2014, 12:53 PM, Richmond wrote: So; perhaps the way to keep everybody happy (well, Thee and Me, at least) is to have some sort of rider in the Dictionary where the ordinal numbers are, that that is for backward compatibility and "delete char 3" is to be preferred. But it isn't for backwa

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 20:46, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 04/07/2014 17:09, Mark Wieder wrote: +1 on that. In all my time using xtalk, I don't think I have ever used ordinal numbers other than "first" and "last". And those sparingly. And backward compatibility? I do see a few stacks that use ordinals. In c

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 04/07/2014 17:09, Mark Wieder wrote: +1 on that. In all my time using xtalk, I don't think I have ever used ordinal numbers other than "first" and "last". And those sparingly. And backward compatibility? I do see a few stacks that use ordinals. In case anyone is wondering, the reason they'r

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 20:28, Jonathan Cooper wrote: Richmond, I don't understand the problem. Can't you simply ignore the ordinal versions ("first " ... "tenth ")? Just teach your students the cardinal versions (" "). Well; that is alright as far as it goes; until some bright spark finds "first" in the

Intersect and Within

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=20960 Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listin

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Jonathan Cooper
Richmond, I don't understand the problem. Can't you simply ignore the ordinal versions ("first " ... "tenth ")? Just teach your students the cardinal versions (" "). I remember, when learning HyperCard ages ago, regarding this alternative syntax as a kind of free bonus. But most of the time I

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Alex Tweedly
On 04/07/2014 17:09, Mark Wieder wrote: +1 on that. In all my time using xtalk, I don't think I have ever used ordinal numbers other than "first" and "last". And those sparingly. And why do we not get to use"penultimate" ? But I agree, I'm another who's never used (and never will use) sec

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Earthednet-wp
+1 Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Jul 4, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Mark Wieder wrote: > > Richmond- > > Friday, July 4, 2014, 1:04:33 AM, you wrote: > >> My feature request would be to REMOVE the ordinals! Then one could ONLY do: > >> delete char 3 and so on > >> and things wo

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Richmond- Friday, July 4, 2014, 1:04:33 AM, you wrote: > My feature request would be to REMOVE the ordinals! Then one could ONLY do: > delete char 3 and so on > and things would be consistent. +1 on that. In all my time using xtalk, I don't think I have ever used ordinal numbers other than "f

Re: searchKey, backKey, menuKey

2014-07-04 Thread Klaus major-k
Am 04.07.2014 um 17:40 schrieb Richard Gaskin : > Richmond wrote: > > I was mucking around in the Dictionary and found the terms: > > > > searchKey, backKey and menuKey > > > > and wondered where they might possibly be on my keyboard ??? > > You won't - the Dictionary notes: > > Platforms: Mo

Re: searchKey, backKey, menuKey

2014-07-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond wrote: > I was mucking around in the Dictionary and found the terms: > > searchKey, backKey and menuKey > > and wondered where they might possibly be on my keyboard ??? You won't - the Dictionary notes: Platforms: Mobile Supported Operating Systems: Android Summary: Sent

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 04/07/14 03:59, Mark Wieder wrote: > >> Jerry- >> >> Thursday, July 3, 2014, 4:50:45 PM, you wrote: >> >> So my answer is, of course, three. 8-) >>> >> Three is also the largest number crows can distinguish, so that makes >> sense. >> >> > May

Re: OT: Collaborative Diagramming Software

2014-07-04 Thread Alejandro Tejada
mwieder wrote > Maybe this? > http://blog.chipp.com/category/diagram-creator/ Hi All, Did anyone noticed spam under this entry: Diagram your websites! by on JUNE 19, 2010 in DIAGRAM CREATOR, LIVECODE in Chipp's webpage? Please, ask Chipp to remove or update the plugin that allows to write spam

searchKey, backKey, menuKey

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
I was mucking around in the Dictionary and found the terms: searchKey, backKey and menuKey and wondered where they might possibly be on my keyboard ??? Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to su

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Peter M. Brigham
On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > What would seem a reasonable upper limit to English-like spelled numbers? --Ten. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 03:15, Paul Looney wrote: 31 - the maximum number of days in month. The Mayans used a 36 day month. And, as I am sure you are well aware, the number of Mayans programming with Livecode is swelling daily. Richmond. ___ use-livecode mail

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 04:50, Jerry Jensen wrote: On Jul 3, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: Jerry- Thursday, July 3, 2014, 4:50:45 PM, you wrote: So my answer is, of course, three. 8-) Three is also the largest number crows can distinguish, so that makes sense. Ah! Oh, wait... I'm not waiti

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 03:59, Mark Wieder wrote: Jerry- Thursday, July 3, 2014, 4:50:45 PM, you wrote: So my answer is, of course, three. 8-) Three is also the largest number crows can distinguish, so that makes sense. Maybe next year I'll run a "Livecode for Crows" Summer School: should pull them i

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 02:49, stephen barncard wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Charles E Buchwald wrote: These 21 additional words would allow numbers up to 999 billion if you construct your phrases like this: "one hundred thousand two hundred fourteen" or "twenty million four hundred twenty two

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 02:50, Jerry Jensen wrote: In the Electronic Maintenance shop at Capitol Records, one guy had two stock answers that he snarkily claimed would answer all questions. First answer: three. Second answer: it can't be done. So my answer is, of course, three. 8-) .Jerry 42 Richmond.

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 02:29, Charles E Buchwald wrote: Richmond, As a sometimes teacher myself, I really appreciate your compulsion to foster initiative. How about showing your "champion" how to define constants? Then she could go ahead and use "eleven" and "twelve" and so on... - Charles That's not

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 01:59, Mark Schonewille wrote: No idea. Just take a pencil, start writing and see when you think you've had enough. That made my Friday morning a 1000 times brighter! Love you, man! Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 01:46, Richard Gaskin wrote: What would seem a reasonable upper limit to English-like spelled numbers? The problem is not with English spelt numbers: the problem is with the inconsistency of using ordinal numbers for 1 -10 and cardinals thereafter. Richmond. ___

Re: Ordinal numbers

2014-07-04 Thread Richmond
On 04/07/14 00:43, Mark Schonewille wrote: Hi Richmond, Ten is defined as a constant and tenth as a keyword according to the dictionary. Eleven and eleventh aren't defined. Although a warning might be appropriate, it is easy to find out why it doesn't work, if one reads the dictionary: eleven