Dar-
Monday, June 9, 2014, 7:01:55 PM, you wrote:
> I tried 1<&2, but it had no impact on the command line (after I
> put in start /w) and did not help shell().
OK - maybe we're talking about two different things.
In your standalone app, try directing the output of shell() to stderr.
I think t
I would like to learn about server.
But, as Frodo would way, I don’t know the way.
Dar Scott
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http:
I think I have some temporary workarounds.
I can use ‘open process’ instead of ‘shell()’ to use the standalone as a
command-line process. This is fine.
In the command window I can use ‘start /w’ to use the standalone as a
command-line process. This is a little embarrassing, but I can ship thi
Thanks, Mark!
I tried 1<&2, but it had no impact on the command line (after I put in ‘start
/w’) and did not help shell().
Do I need server?
Dar
On Jun 9, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Dar-
>
> Monday, June 9, 2014, 6:05:24 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Well, technically STDOUT does go to t
Oh. I forgot about launch applications and console applications on Windows.
OK. So, I used ‘start /w’ on a command window and that works as expected. But
shell() still has problems. If I set hideConsoleWindows to false, I see the
output on the window that flashes up. But, whether true or fa
Dar-
Monday, June 9, 2014, 6:05:24 PM, you wrote:
> Well, technically STDOUT does go to the DOS window, but it is
> after the next prompt. And (so far) a quick test with shell() is
> not working.
Yes, Microsoft has a rather strange definition of stdout. If you pipe
the output to stderr instea
Well, technically STDOUT does go to the DOS window, but it is after the next
prompt. And (so far) a quick test with shell() is not working.
Dar
On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I’m still using 6.6.1. I’ll upgrade!
>
> Dar
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:07 PM,
I wonder if it would be a good platform for developing Xtras.
Bill
On Jun 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Jerry Jensen [via Runtime Revolution]
wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Geoff Canyon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Apparently it was 9 hours with some interruptions. If we're talking basic
> >
On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
> Apparently it was 9 hours with some interruptions. If we're talking basic
> functionality -- fly the bird, flap the wings, move the pillars left and
> count how many the user has passed, collision detection, start/end games
> and high score track
Ah, I forgot something really important:
Like Video Players, all Games are greedy
by nurture. They want/need all hardware
resources available to perform better.
Does LiveCode have this behavior?
Could LiveCode grab all hardware resources
available to perform better in a game?
Al
--
View this
Scott McDonald from http://livecodegamedeveloper.com/index.html
could provide the definitive answer, but your guess of
4 hours or more is accurate for an experienced
LiveCode developer.
Al
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Flappy-bird-clone-takes-9
Thanks!
I’m still using 6.6.1. I’ll upgrade!
Dar
On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Dar Scott wrote:
>
> > I can run my LiveCode standalone application on the command-line on
> > OS X and writing to STDOUT goes to the terminal window.
> >
> > But on Windows 7 I don’t see
Dar Scott wrote:
> I can run my LiveCode standalone application on the command-line on
> OS X and writing to STDOUT goes to the terminal window.
>
> But on Windows 7 I don’t see STDOUT in the DOS prompt window.
Which version are you using?
This bug was marked as Fixed for 6.6.2, the current sta
I can run my LiveCode standalone application on the command-line on OS X and
writing to STDOUT goes to the terminal window.
But on Windows 7 I don’t see STDOUT in the DOS prompt window. The -ui switch
seems to work, because no GUI window is displayed. Also, the command-line
prompt comes bac
writes:
> I'm still getting some very weird behavior with the compiled program using
Windows XP and 6.1.1 (rc4) -
> behavior that doesn't show up in the IDE, but does show up in the compiled.
>
> Do you have a recommendation as to any later release that would be more
stable?
dp => developer re
larry wrote:
> I'm still getting some very weird behavior with the compiled program
> using Windows XP and 6.1.1 (rc4) - behavior that doesn't show up in
> the IDE, but does show up in the compiled.
>
> Do you have a recommendation as to any later release that would be
> more stable?
I tend to u
I shouldn't have written that, because LiveCode just crashed :-)
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Installer Maker for LiveCode:
http://qery.us/468
Hi Larry,
I don't use XP at the moment. Today I happen to be using LC 6.6.1.4005
on Windows 8.1 and I don't experience any problems. Revolution 4.5-dp4
always worked fine for me on Windows XP. What kind of weird behaviour to
you observe?
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Con
Hello All,
I'm still getting some very weird behavior with the compiled program using
Windows XP and 6.1.1 (rc4) - behavior that doesn't show up in the IDE, but does
show up in the compiled.
Do you have a recommendation as to any later release that would be more stable?
TIA
Larry
_
QCC bug 12614
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
On 07/06/2014 21:23, Colin Holgate wrote:
With this version, how do you create a nav bar that has a title, or a tab bar
that has buttons in it? I only seem to be able to make gray rectangles. Also,
the browser object seems not to l
Ok, my bad. Seems I do not understand when you wrote:
3) in the datagrid templates substack I see two cards, id 1002 and id
1005. I've never seen that before!
When all is working, a template stack is composed at least by 2 cards:
- id 1002 should be the card which contains the instructions group,
Apologies...it is id 1005, not id 1002 that I have in every template. And I've
never to my recollection deleted any cards from the template stack.
g
On 9 Jun 2014, at 6:23 pm, zryip theSlug wrote:
> A thing I doesn't understand: how are you customizing the row template
> group in the cd id 10
Has anyone used LiveCode on Kobo Touch (or any other reasonably cheap e-ink
ereader)?
I've been wanting to create a... thing... using an e-ink display, and it
appears that hacking an e-reader is by the far the cheapest way to get the
hardware. I've been looking at Kindles, but then I came acr
Gerry,
Sorry to be insistent, but having only one card in the datagrid
template substack is not the normal behavior for datagrids. That is
probably your problem when you are trying to edit a template. A new
datagrid = a new template card = a new behavior button.
A thing I doesn't understand: how a
I created a test stack. I created six buttons and grouped them. I ran the
following in a seventh button. It never failed.
I'm using 6.5.2. Somewhere along the way the more specific childControlIDs
was added. I didn't know if it is available in 6.1.1 so I didn't use it.
on mouseUp
repeat 1000
Browser loads url OK for me in LC6, but not 7 - which I assume is an LC
bug as it's the exact same code in the behavior for the control - I'll
check it out today and file a QCC. The main fix was that the plugin
actually runs in LC7. I don't think the any of the native controls are
created pro
26 matches
Mail list logo
