Re: Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0

Another weirdness is that patterns that I used in Rev 4.0 don't display anymore. However, if I add the revPatterns.rev or something like that to the Stacks section of the standalone builder, suddenly the fonts are OK. What's going on? That shouldn't even be related. Patterns then appear correctly t

Re: Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0

On 6/24/13 9:14 PM, Roger Eller wrote: This isn't for mobile. I'm seeing this difference on the same machine. It's just IDE -vs- standalone for Windows. Oops. That's pretty odd then. It could be the font size, maybe. I know some Windows fonts look scrawny at a different size than the IDE uses.

Re: Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0

This isn't for mobile. I'm seeing this difference on the same machine. It's just IDE -vs- standalone for Windows. ~Roger On Jun 24, 2013 10:07 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: > On 6/24/13 3:43 PM, Roger Eller wrote: > >> In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I >> a

Re: Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0

On 6/24/13 3:43 PM, Roger Eller wrote: In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I am moving forward, but text is becoming extremely bitmapped in appearance. I have tried LiveCode 5.5.4, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2, all with the same results. In all cases, the stacks look

[on-rev] LC code output bumping against a server size limit?

Hi Folks, My on-rev LC server code takes data from many files and organizes it into an array. It then arrayEncodes and base64Encodes the array and "puts" it to the requesting app. Normally the code works as expected, but when the encoded array approaches 8 MB, an internal server error (500)

Re: Using the Find command in IOS

I have filed a bug report (*10978 *) about this issue. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Howard Bornstein wrote: > Thanks for the response. That would be great but my testing does not > support this. When I do a find of a field within a scroller gr

Re: LiveCode for iPad dev

This one perhaps: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Media_Tool On Jun 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, "Javier Miranda V." wrote: > >a product from Apple (surprisingly I don´t remember the name!) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Ple

LiveCode for iPad dev

Hi friends, I have been "inactive" for many months. I am happy to see how LiveCode has evolved and matured, also by inspecting the list,I see familiar names, certainly this is a great community. Plese let me share something for you, a couple of weeks ago a pharmaceutical laboratory approached

Fonts look awful in standalones built in v5.5+ -vs- v4.0

In an attempt to bring my stacks out of the dark ages of Revolution 4.0, I am moving forward, but text is becoming extremely bitmapped in appearance. I have tried LiveCode 5.5.4, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2, all with the same results. In all cases, the stacks look fine in the IDE, but as a standalone they g

Re: Does Apple accepts App with LC field instead of native iOS fields?

The problem being that native fields on an iOS form tend to have different proportions than fields on other platforms. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Mike Kerner wrote: > I think that might be coming. > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Roger Eller > wrote: > >> LiveCode fields are just ea

Re: Does Apple accepts App with LC field instead of native iOS fields?

I think that might be coming. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Roger Eller wrote: > LiveCode fields are just easier to use. I really wish the builder would > automatically make the distinction based on the target platform. > > ~Roger > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Gerry Orkin > wrote:

Re: Post command help

Thanks Mark, that's exactly what I needed to know. This stuff is out of my league. On 6/24/13 11:03 AM, Mark Wilcox wrote: Another suggestion would be setting the property libUrlSetSSLVerification to false as this may also resolve the issue.. Another question: does setting libUrlSetSSLVer

Re: Does Apple accepts App with LC field instead of native iOS fields?

LiveCode fields are just easier to use. I really wish the builder would automatically make the distinction based on the target platform. ~Roger On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Gerry Orkin wrote: > I have an app in the store that uses LiveCode fields. Native fields are > useful where the user

BETA RELEASE: LiveCode 6.1.0 RC1

Dear All, We are please to announce the release of LiveCode 6.1 RC1. This beta release is for test purposes only. We would encourage all those who would like to contribute to the development of the product to download, install and test this release, reporting issues back to us via http://quality.r

Re: Running LiveCode on Google Chrome Books

Mike Kerner wrote: > The new units also have a certain amount of local storage for using with > Google Drive. > The chromebook is designed mainly to be a lightweight, fast, cheap, > high-battery life machine for running HTML5.  The main weakness, IMHO, is > that it is about 5 years late because i

Re: Post command help

Thanks Mark. In the meantime, I found this one for more security: http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6995&p=31804&hilit=https#p31804 Regards, Thierry 2013/6/24 Mark Wilcox > > > >> Another suggestion would be setting the property > libUrlSetSSLVerification > >> to false > >> as t

Re: Installer always downloads community version rather than commercial version

On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Dave Kilroy2 wrote: > No I haven't seen this behaviour - however the LiveCode updater hasn't been > firing for me since version 6.0.0 And I wrote to soon. This morning, on the machine in my office, it went for the developer version. But I'm still dealing with it

Re: Post command help

>> Another suggestion would be setting the property libUrlSetSSLVerification >> to false >> as this may also resolve the issue.. > Another question: does setting libUrlSetSSLVerification to false mean > security is turned off completely, or only that the certificate isn't checked? Not doing SS

Re: Running LiveCode on Google Chrome Books

Hi, Thinking more, but sorta selfishly. Our LC based camp attendance application could "operate" on a Chrome Book with a teacher in the field should we make some changes, it seems. What this means is we make the content of the app into a Read Only presentation (perhaps PDF) and the stuff th

Re: Post command help

2013/6/24 J. Landman Gay > > Another suggestion would be setting the property libUrlSetSSLVerification >> to false >> as this may also resolve the issue.. >> > > Another question: does setting libUrlSetSSLVerification to false mean > security is turned off completely, or only that the certificat

Re: Post command help

​Hello Jacque, ​ 2013/6/24 J. Landman Gay Thanks for posting that, Thierry. I'm working on a project that needs SSL > and your problem had me worried. > ​Well, it still worries me :( ​ > > It sounds like the issue only occurs on OS X 10.6, right? Mac 10.7+ and > Windows machines are not affe

Re: Post command help

Another suggestion would be setting the property libUrlSetSSLVerification to false as this may also resolve the issue.. Another question: does setting libUrlSetSSLVerification to false mean security is turned off completely, or only that the certificate isn't checked? -- Jacqueline Landman

Re: Post command help

Thanks for posting that, Thierry. I'm working on a project that needs SSL and your problem had me worried. It sounds like the issue only occurs on OS X 10.6, right? Mac 10.7+ and Windows machines are not affected? Do you know? On 6/24/13 9:07 AM, Thierry Douez wrote: 2013/6/22 Thierry Douez

Re: Post command help

2013/6/22 Thierry Douez > Coming back :( > > More details: > > I'm on MacOS. > > Restarting my Mac and my Internet Box and got again the same error: > > post myData to url "https://myDomain"; > > > > But, executing this line of script always works: > > get shell("curl -s -d" && quote & myData

Re: Running LiveCode on Google Chrome Books

Here's a nice demo of a Chrome book running Ubuntu (for ARM). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AmkViFJbAg ~Roger On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Roger Eller wrote: > Perhaps when we have an Arm version of LiveCode. It looks like a 'true' > OS can be installed on Chrome book hardware. See Chr