On 23/06/13 22:53, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Sunday, June 23, 2013, 12:26:43 PM, you wrote:
That is still "not very good" that the thing wouldn't play ball from
another disk.
That should be pointed out to Linux users.
Well, one of the problems with expanding the audience of the dp
releases
LC has a lot of "moving part" going on behind the scenes and much of it is
not immediately obvious. I can definitely say this list is a great resource
and between the suggestions, the clarifications, and my somewhat kludgy work
around I have a path forward.
Thanks,
John
Arithmetic takes (for each parameter) either a string that is a numeral or it
takes the result of arithmetic (or sometimes binaryDecode).
The result of arithmetic is a "double precision" floating point number, an
internal representation. That essentially means you get about 15 digits of
resolu
Not sure it will work as you need it too, but one last test before I crash.
I put a calc into a field and did this:
*put* format("%1.60e",value(field 1))
Bipassing do, and it seems to function well enough. Would have to wrap it
in a try/catch or something since you can't count on the user put
Mike,
I need to dig a bit deeper and perhaps make a test app. The issue could be
a bit more complicated in my case as the math is happening behind a "do"
statement.
There is field in which the user enters what they want to calculate. I take
that and add a "put" and an "into" targeting
Hmm. was just messing with it in the message box.. I'm not a math guy, but
seems that when using format you shouldn't need to specify the numberformat.
I did this.. put format("%1.60e",1.23456e-41 * 1e-20) where 60 is the
desired precision. Seems to work, same type of result but you specify the
Craig,
With an insanely large number of "#" in number format I can get this to
work: 1234567890123e-10 * 1e-170. I get the result: 1.2345678901230e-168.
It appears that there is a bit more going on as they are floating point
values.
Thanks,
John
On Jun 23, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Craig Newman
Mike,
Thanks for the tip. I am using "format" for display purposes so that I get
correctly formatted numbers but, unless I use "numberFormat" first, there is
not enough precision available from the result of the multiplication and the
result is 0.
It appears that "numberFormat" sets the
I may be old fashioned, in that I always thought that the Apple SANE limits, 19
digits, was still the law of the land. This is OS9 stuff, though and I could
just be doddering. But it would mean that setting the number format to such an
outrageous string would be futile, most of that string ignor
look at the format function, specifically the "%#.##E" (or e) incantation.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:20 PM, John wrote:
>It seems odd that I haven't stumbled into this before and I am sure I
> am doing something wrong, I just can't seem to find a better way around the
> issue of working wit
It seems odd that I haven't stumbled into this before and I am sure I am
doing something wrong, I just can't seem to find a better way around the issue
of working with small numbers.
Suppose I want to multiply two small numbers such as: 1.23456e-41 * 1e-20.
Unless I am happy with a resul
Le 24 juin 2013 à 02:01, Scott Rossi a écrit :
> Although one *could* look at this scenario as simply trying to set the
> filename of the image, but in this case, the filename happens to be empty.
> If you couldn't set the filename of any image, what would you suggest? Having
> 2 types of ima
On 24/06/2013, at 10:01 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> Although one *could* look at this scenario as simply trying to set the
> filename of the image, but in this case, the filename happens to be empty.
> If you couldn't set the filename of any image, what would you suggest? Having
> 2 types of ima
Although one *could* look at this scenario as simply trying to set the filename
of the image, but in this case, the filename happens to be empty. If you
couldn't set the filename of any image, what would you suggest? Having 2 types
of images? Or disallow the filename property for imported imag
On 6/23/13 5:15 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Monte-
Sunday, June 23, 2013, 3:05:33 PM, you wrote:
The first is setting an image's filename to empty when it's not a
referenced image clears the image.. As it would currently return
empty for the filename setting it to empty should have no effect in
my
Exactly my thoughts.
--
M E R Goulding
Software development services
mergExt - There's an external for that!
On 24/06/2013, at 9:03 AM, Jacques Hausser wrote:
> When the filename is already empty, the image was imported and emptying it
> should do absolutely nothing. They are other ways to cl
>From your description I'm not sure how you are using setting the filename of
>an image to empty clearing it as a feature. Note that if you have an imported
>image then setting its text should clear it. If you have a referenced image
>then setting its filename should clear it. The quirk is that
As long as emptying the filename of a *referenced* image actually clears the
imagedata, I would agree with Mark and Monte. When the filename is already
empty, the image was imported and emptying it should do absolutely nothing.
They are other ways to clear it (set the text of image "X" to "").
Mark,
I use this as an useful feature all the time when i need to load and work on an
image and its magedata in putting it first in (the template of) the pre
definite empty image.
Le 24 juin 2013 à 00:15, Mark Wieder a écrit :
> To put that into perspective:
>
> create a new stack
> import a
Monte-
Sunday, June 23, 2013, 3:05:33 PM, you wrote:
> The first is setting an image's filename to empty when it's not a
> referenced image clears the image.. As it would currently return
> empty for the filename setting it to empty should have no effect in
> my opinion. This would be consistent
I've identified another couple of quirks while working on the properties array
that might need addressing in various ways.
The first is setting an image's filename to empty when it's not a referenced
image clears the image.. As it would currently return empty for the filename
setting it to emp
Richmond-
Sunday, June 23, 2013, 12:26:43 PM, you wrote:
> That is still "not very good" that the thing wouldn't play ball from
> another disk.
> That should be pointed out to Linux users.
Well, one of the problems with expanding the audience of the dp
releases is that people will install them.
On 06/23/2013 10:03 PM, Richmond wrote:
http://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/6_1_0/
Richmond.
To which; having downloaded the Linux version of LC 6.1 dp 2 and
attempted an install we
get a "merry little message":
"The installation was not successful.
"Installer slave quit unexpectedly.
http://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/6_1_0/
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-
The new units also have a certain amount of local storage for using with
Google Drive.
The chromebook is designed mainly to be a lightweight, fast, cheap,
high-battery life machine for running HTML5. The main weakness, IMHO, is
that it is about 5 years late because ipads and android tablets are f
Perhaps when we have an Arm version of LiveCode. It looks like a 'true' OS
can be installed on Chrome book hardware. See ChrUbuntu.
http://chromeos-cr48.blogspot.com�;
~Roger
Sent from my Pipo M2
On Jun 23, 2013 12:41 PM, "Richmond" wrote:
> On 06/23/2013 05:39 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
>
>> Yo
On 06/23/2013 05:39 PM, Mike Kerner wrote:
You can't. Chromebooks are running Chromium, which is just enough OS to
get you into a browser (and a very minimal file system).
I have just fired up Chromium in VMware player and can see that it is
not really
what I would call an operating system
You can't. Chromebooks are running Chromium, which is just enough OS to
get you into a browser (and a very minimal file system).
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ian Wood wrote:
> I thought you could only run web apps on Chromebooks, not native code?
>
> Ian
>
> On 22 Jun 2013, at 16:48, Mark
No I haven't seen this behaviour - however the LiveCode updater hasn't been
firing for me since version 6.0.0
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Installer-always-downloads-community-version-rather-than-commercial-version-tp4666716p4666727.html
Sent
Dunno . . .
. . . but here's something worth looking at to get started with:
http://chromeos-cr48.blogspot.com/2012/10/how-to-run-chrome-os-not-chromium-os-on.html
I'm going to "have a go" after the other 57 things on my list!
Richmond.
___
use-live
Hi all
Am trying to build an app for iOS with LC 5.5.5 and get the error:
Could not find external revdb for Device
though I can see that it's in the application subfolder:
/Tools/Runtime/iOS/Device/
I've successfully built the app with previous versions of LC.
Has anyone else seen this error
http://www.roywood.co.uk/
and resemblance between Roy Wood's website and Livecode Kickstarter
Goals and Stretch Goals is purely . . . .
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and ma
Got errors popping up "no such button" -- the button was referred to as "bg btn
id 1" and it evidently referred to the popup button to choose the number of
iterations, and its ID in the properties inspector was 4982. I found several
other similar object references, then poked around a little mor
Not round here, mate!
I just found the Spam filter (thank you, thank you, thank you
Thunderbird e-mail client)
of my g-mail account stuffed with 15 copies of a st-o-o-o-pid message
about 'GOLD SHARES'
and wondered if anybody else is getting the same sort of nonsense.
I have been getting about
34 matches
Mail list logo