I can't remember, was the image imported into LC or referenced from disk?
Could the file on disk be fine but some hiccup have happened during the import?
--
Scott Morrow
On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 8/7/12 11:30 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>> The image does seem to be f
On 8/7/12 11:30 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
The image does seem to be fully usable. Given how small it is, why do
you not use PNG instead of JPEG?
Even with saving the JPEG as PNG, it's smaller. If you took the
original gradient straight to PNG, it may be smaller still.
I started with png origina
Alejandro-
Tuesday, August 7, 2012, 10:44:58 AM, you wrote:
> Hopefully, you will find time to create (and sell)
> a robust and general solution that could work with
> any kind of application created in this platform.
OK. I uploaded libUndo to revOnline as a general purpose mechanism.
Turns out
Colin-
Tuesday, August 7, 2012, 9:30:56 PM, you wrote:
> Even with saving the JPEG as PNG, it's smaller. If you took the
> original gradient straight to PNG, it may be smaller still.
Eventually you'll be able to fold it into its own pocket and never
have to worry about parking again.
--
-Mark
According to Kevin's presentation at RRLive '12 this should be easy. So what
am I doing wrong? I want to create a reusable graphic object that would sit
at the left edge of some cards, and not others. So, here goes...
Create a rectangle object, make it opaque, i filled mine with 20% grey. It
will
The image does seem to be fully usable. Given how small it is, why do you not
use PNG instead of JPEG?
Even with saving the JPEG as PNG, it's smaller. If you took the original
gradient straight to PNG, it may be smaller still.
___
use-livecode mailing
Alejandro Tejada wrote
>
> I don't know anything about databases...
> How could I help?
> I guarantee that I could make mistakes
> that you could not believe were possible
> while using your application... :-D
>
> Al
>
Where's the "Like" icon when you need it :)
--
View this message in con
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Alejandro Tejada
wrote:
>
> Andre Garzia-3 wrote
>>
>> The library is tested and targeted at SQLite databases but it works
>> with any database supported by RevDB (with a sane SQL standard)
>>
>
> How different is this library from SQLYoga?
The quick version is th
FWIW, dpi doesn't really matter for display images. 72,75,300 dpi all
display the same as long as they have the same number of pixels..
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> I know of someone who was asked to prepare some Photoshop files at 32 bit,
> 165 dpi. I'm not sure where
On 8/7/12 9:41 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Tuesday, August 7, 2012, 7:16:04 PM, you wrote:
It may not crash for you, it might have been my stack. But if you find
out anything I'd like to know.
I created a new stack, made a new image, and set the filename to the
url you specified. It worke
On 8/7/12 9:20 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Is that link supposed to take me to something?
You should be able to right-click on the link and save the image to your
drive.
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/23431607/crasherGradient.jpg
--
Jacque
Jacque-
Tuesday, August 7, 2012, 7:16:04 PM, you wrote:
> It may not crash for you, it might have been my stack. But if you find
> out anything I'd like to know.
I created a new stack, made a new image, and set the filename to the
url you specified. It worked fine here with no crashes on Win XP
Is that link supposed to take me to something?
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/23431607/crasherGradient.jpg
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
On 8/7/12 7:25 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
Can I have it too?
On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Will you send this Photoshop JPG image to RunRev?
Sure, anyone who wants to examine it can get it from my dropbox here:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/23431607/crasherGradient.jpg
It
I have no idea, I haven't seen the JPEG. I would start by seeing if it goes
wrong for me, and then to see if there was anything odd about the JPEG.
On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
> What do you think, Colin?
___
use-livecode mail
What do you think, Colin?
This file have a sequence of bytes that
the engine reads in the wrong way.
How many bytes could that be?
2, 3 or 4 characters in sequence?
Al
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/What-was-that-thing-with-Photoshop-images-
Andre Garzia-3 wrote
>
> The library is tested and targeted at SQLite databases but it works
> with any database supported by RevDB (with a sane SQL standard)
>
How different is this library from SQLYoga?
Al
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Ne
Can I have it too?
On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
>
> Will you send this Photoshop JPG image to RunRev?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
Hi Jacque,
J. Landman Gay wrote
>
> Okay, this is wrong. I've narrowed down the crash to a single Photoshop
> jpg image. I couldn't even select it in the application browser without
> LiveCode blowing up and quitting unexpectedly. Any use of the image in a
> script crashed only intermittently
I'm going to say that the preview thumbnail is corrupted. I have had the Finder
lock on other files where the preview thumbnail was messed up.
Bob
On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:58 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 8/7/12 1:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty well convinced now the issues I'm h
Not sure but I think there *may* have been an issue way back when using JPEG
images that were saved in progressive format.
But apparently you solve the problem so no need to check.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design
Recently, Jacque Landman Gay wrote:
> On 8/7/12
A big thank you to my current supporters/customers. Here's to a lively
externals market!
--Maarten
On Monday, August 6, 2012, Maarten Koopmans wrote:
> LOL. I want forced spellchecking *in my fingers*...
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Peter M. Brigham
> >
> wrote:
> > On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:
Jacque,
I been using PIXresizer from http://bluefive.pair.com/ for years and it
never disappoints. It is freeware and does single image or folder level
resolution/format conversions. Every image I use gets converted to jpgs(or
just resaved from jpg to jpg) with PIXresizer regardless of the origina
Adobe Community Professional, not a Photoshop one.
On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:53 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
> >Said friend remarked that you have been designated an official Photoshop
> >Professional. Congrats! I mention it so the list will know we have a pro in
> >our midst.
On 8/7/12 1:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I'm pretty well convinced now the issues I'm having as due to the new
field object. I'm tinkering with that.
Okay, this is wrong. I've narrowed down the crash to a single Photoshop
jpg image. I couldn't even select it in the application browser withou
Thanks all for your answers.
I am doing now a simple replace to get the characters corrected.
Matthias
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences
On 8/7/12 1:30 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
By which I'm sure you mean 8 bits per channel, otherwise known as regular 32
bit.
Yeah. Whatever you said is what I got. I'm fuzzy on all those details.
Said friend remarked that you have been designated an official Photoshop
Professional. Congrats! I
once the LC desktop external interface (and LC desktop) is more
"current" (i.e. Cocoa, entitlement support, ...) : definitely!
--Maarten
On Tuesday, August 7, 2012, Klaus on-rev wrote:
> Am 07.08.2012 um 17:09 schrieb Magicgate Software - Skip Kimpel <
> s...@magicgate.com >:
>
> > What is
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:54 AM, stephen barncard
wrote:
> It's a small lib that simplifies the communication with a sqlLite database,
> using a small set of commands.
>
> Very logical and straightforward.
>
Thanks for the kind words Stephen =D
The library is tested and targeted at SQLite databas
By which I'm sure you mean 8 bits per channel, otherwise known as regular 32
bit.
On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> >The ones you told her to use. :) We're down to 72 dpi and 8-bit photoshop
> >images.
___
use-livecode mailing lis
On 8/7/12 6:26 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
I know of someone who was asked to prepare some Photoshop files at 32
bit, 165 dpi. I'm not sure where the 165 comes from, but on the bit
front my friend was running into problems when using the 32 bits per
channel mode in Photoshop.
I explained that 32 bi
Mark Wieder wrote
>
> Ick! No, I would never suggest something as cumbersome as that!
> It's as simple as adding another dimension to the undo array.
> Here's a minor adjustment to the Undo.Push and Undo.Pop commands in
> the code I posted earlier.
> [snip amazing LiveCode Script]
>
Ok, Now I g
Databases are so stupid-easy that I am using a DB. I've tried both an
angry hard-core DBMS and LC connected to . Both work great. If
you are scared of/inexperienced with databases, then there are several LC
database libraries that will make that problem go away.
I think you guys are overthinkin
Hi Dan,
I have several fields on one card so I don't want the field to display
on the entire card, as it ruins everything else. I understand you
are trying to use that as an example, but other than the display what
should I be setting the rect to if not the size of the contents for scrolling?
It
Am 07.08.2012 um 17:09 schrieb Magicgate Software - Skip Kimpel
:
> What is the possibility of accessing the iCloud files from a LC
> project running on Windows?
Yep!
What about a desktop version of the external? 8-)
> SKIP
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Rebbe
> wrote:
>> Maa
What is the possibility of accessing the iCloud files from a LC
project running on Windows?
SKIP
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Rebbe
wrote:
> Maarten,
>
> i will definitely buy it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 03.08.2012 um 13:53 schrieb Maarten Koopmans :
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I hav
I know of someone who was asked to prepare some Photoshop files at 32 bit, 165
dpi. I'm not sure where the 165 comes from, but on the bit front my friend was
running into problems when using the 32 bits per channel mode in Photoshop.
I explained that 32 bit really means 8 bits per channel for RG
37 matches
Mail list logo
