On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> I think we found a bug. If you hold down shift and use the arrow keys the
> selectionChanged message is sent. If your just moving the cursor it isn't
> sent but it should be. Do you want to report it or me?
>
> I'm not sure that I fully u
Not yet, but I've noted your interest and Lynn's replies and whenever it
does become an option with on-rev it's something I'd certainly be
experimenting with.
Let's hope it's not too far away.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:46 PM, william humphrey wrote:
> Does anyone host a valentina server on the o
On 6/7/12 6:27 PM, william humphrey wrote:
This is the working screenrect for my mac os laptop pro 0,22,1440,830 and
that is much larger than the stack which is 726 by 780 and the max height
is 900 (it was originally the default of 6500 but that seemed to make no
difference). It was something to
This is the working screenrect for my mac os laptop pro 0,22,1440,830 and
that is much larger than the stack which is 726 by 780 and the max height
is 900 (it was originally the default of 6500 but that seemed to make no
difference). It was something to do with upgrade to Lion as that was the
only
Bob Sneidar writes:
> But in my defense it was only once.
Would that I had your self-control...
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe a
:-)
On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Sue-
>
> I'm not home right now, but leave a message at the beep and I'll get back to
> you.
>
> --
> Mark Wieder
> mwie...@ahsoftware.net
>
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode
I agree, to which I might add that any crash which causes the end user to run
down the street screaming, "Once more into the breach!" and throwing old CD's
at the neighborhood pets is extremely severe. But in my defense it was only
once.
Bob
On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
Sue-
I'm not home right now, but leave a message at the beep and I'll get back to
you.
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage yo
Richmond writes:
> This sort of problem is minor and should never deter anybody considering
Ah, no. A crash of the IDE for whatever reason is never minor. A crash that
takes the user's data with it is severe.
--
Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
__
Peter Haworth wrote:
> I think I brought this up the last time this discussion surfaced,
> but I think there's benefit to be had from being to able to discern
> exactly what changes took place between two versions of a stack file
> - were any controls added/deleted or did their properties change,
Hey, you know what would make this a lot easier? A new property called
objectVersion (a number), and a stack property called stackObjects (an array).
Each time an object is edited, the objectVersion gets incremented by 1. This
way you could simply compare a list of stackObjects with a saved one,
I think I brought this up the last time this discussion surfaced, but I
think there's benefit to be had from being to able to discern exactly what
changes took place between two versions of a stack file - were any controls
added/deleted or did their properties change, which scripts were
added/delet
Many long years ago (about 9) I did some work for an odd person
in Edinburgh to design a stack that could be convereted to HTML at a
button click,
where it is now I really don't know.
If anyone can locate the thing it may have some, residual, value.
Richmond.
_
But it wouldn't work as a stack anymore. If all a stack consisted of were the
things in it, you could probably export to all those easily, but a stack is not
just the things, but the interaction between the things, and the things and the
user. How would you get a web version of a stack to refere
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote
[snip]
Maybe, but the absence of other devs anxious to dive in to help may also
merely suggest that such a translator has limited utility to the
community.
[snip]
But LiveCode stacks are only useful when run with the LiveCode engine.
Well, that is
Hi Richard and Colin,
Richard Gaskin wrote
>
> [snip]
> Maybe, but the absence of other devs anxious to dive in to help may also
> merely suggest that such a translator has limited utility to the
> community.
> [snip]
> But LiveCode stacks are only useful when run with the LiveCode engine.
>
Hi William,
check "the working screenrect"...
Am 07.06.2012 um 18:24 schrieb Paul Looney:
> If the stack is tall and the dock is located at the bottom of the screen, the
> bottom of the stack will be cut off - even if the dock is hidden.
> Paul Looney
>
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Richard Ga
If the stack is tall and the dock is located at the bottom of the screen, the
bottom of the stack will be cut off - even if the dock is hidden.
Paul Looney
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> william humphrey wrote:
>> the MaxHeight is only available when the stack is resizable.
Definitely!
Another Yahoo account compromised.
On 2012-06-07, at 9:12 AM, René Micout wrote:
> Spam ?
>
> Le 7 juin 2012 à 18:00, Sue Smith a écrit :
>
>> hi!my friends were sick of always paying for me this couldnt have
>> worked out better I had finally hit rock bottom!> href="http://job-36
Am 07.06.2012 um 18:12 schrieb René Micout:
> Spam ?
Whatever, bravo Sue! :-D
> Le 7 juin 2012 à 18:00, Sue Smith a écrit :
>
>> hi!my friends were sick of always paying for me this couldnt have
>> worked out better I had finally hit rock bottom!> href="http://job-360.eu/currentevents/45Graha
Spam ?
Le 7 juin 2012 à 18:00, Sue Smith a écrit :
> hi!my friends were sick of always paying for me this couldnt have
> worked out better I had finally hit rock bottom! href="http://job-360.eu/currentevents/45GrahamRoberts/";>http://job-360.eu/currentevents/45GrahamRoberts/
> this proves that
Hi everyone,
I have just released an update of the Installer Maker Plugin, the plugin which
allows you to wrap your LiveCode standalones in an installer without using
additional software. This version fixes a few bugs reported by customers and
enables support for resource forks.
More informati
william humphrey wrote:
the MaxHeight is only available when the stack is resizable.
The property still exists and can affect rendered size - what is its value?
I have the stack set to "no-resize" so I was surprised when my
laptops 15 inch monitor, the same one that ran fine before upgrade
t
the MaxHeight is only available when the stack is resizable. I have the
stack set to "no-resize" so I was surprised when my laptops 15 inch
monitor, the same one that ran fine before upgrade to Lion, now cuts the
stack down to a smaller size even though the original size fit fine on the
monitor.
O
XML predates RunRev, though it's only been a standard for five years or so. But
Richard was onto the main reason why it hasn't been used to convert things to
other formats. XML just describes a way of structuring data, it doesn't specify
what that data is. Even if you take something that is high
william humphrey wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the height of stacks is forced back to 735 pixels
on MacOS lion on laptop with a stack designed to be 790 pixels high and not
resizable? How do we prevent that?
How big is your monitor?
And what is the value of the stack's maxHeight property?
N
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 6/6/12 2:36 PM, Richmond wrote:
An on-going problem is that the RR/LC Dictionary crashes the IDE on
Linux (3.5, 4.0, 4.5 at least),
and, at last, I have found a suitably mental workaround for this problem
. . . .
Build Metacard using Jacque's 2.0.1 Metacard builder fro
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
I believe that the real problem is to work alone in this XML exchange
project... :-)
Maybe, but the absence of other devs anxious to dive in to help may also
merely suggest that such a translator has limited utility to the community.
After all, it's not like XML is a
Has anyone noticed that the height of stacks is forced back to 735 pixels
on MacOS lion on laptop with a stack designed to be 790 pixels high and not
resizable? How do we prevent that?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please vis
On 06/07/2012 10:32 AM, Richmond wrote:
Hey-Ho; more jollifications:
If I try to access RevOnline RR/LC version 3.5 it does not work,
Does anybody know where the "cut-off" is for (new) RevOnline?
I am trying to build a version of Metacard to build Mac Classic
standalones
that is later than v
Hey-Ho; more jollifications:
If I try to access RevOnline RR/LC version 3.5 it does not work,
Does anybody know where the "cut-off" is for (new) RevOnline?
I am trying to build a version of Metacard to build Mac Classic standalones
that is later than version 2.5.
Retro Richmond.
__
31 matches
Mail list logo
