Randy,
I didn't realize that mouseUp and mouseDoubleUp worked on mobile too. I thought
I had to use touch type messages.
Thanks,
Bill Vlahos
_
InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your important life
information with you, accessible, and secure.
On Oct 2, 201
Bill,
I've used mouseDoubleUp in iOS.
be well,
randy hengst
-
On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote:
> There is a doubleMouseUp message. Is there an equivalent for double taps on
> iOS?
>
> Bill Vlahos
> _
> InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping y
There is a doubleMouseUp message. Is there an equivalent for double taps on iOS?
Bill Vlahos
_
InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your important life
information with you, accessible, and secure.
___
use-livecode m
On Oct 2, 2011, at 7:25 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 10/2/11 3:24 PM, James Hurley wrote:
>> Scott,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> My mistake. It is not removed from the group. What happens is that
>> the dimensions of the group change when an outside control is made
>> invisible.
>
> Th
Jim:
Me neither. I made three buttons (B1, B2, B3) and grouped them into group
"grp1".
This in another button script:
on mouseup
set the visible of btn "b2" to "false"
answer the owner of btn "b2"
end mouseUp
I get "group grp1". LC 4.5.3.
Craig Newman
-Original Message-
Fr
Graham,
You should check out:
http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/ghostscript-9.02/doc/Devices.htm
There it documents how you can use Ghostscript to output
PNG,JPG,TIF,BMP and other formats. HTH.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists
On 10/2/11 3:24 PM, James Hurley wrote:
Scott,
Thanks for your reply.
My mistake. It is not removed from the group. What happens is that
the dimensions of the group change when an outside control is made
invisible.
That's the default behavior, where a group resizes to accomodate its
objects.
Thank you both!
I was trying:set the hilite of the hilitedbutton of me to false
Needless to say, that was not working -- for multiple reasons!
Mark P.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Turn-off-all-Radio-Buttons-tp3865377p3866080.html
Thanks for your understanding, Chipp.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
See what you get with only a small contribution. All our LiveCode downloads ar
Hi, Bill - here's an idea. I created a stack with a button (Button1), 3
rectangle graphics (R1, R2, R3) and a field (data).
The id's of the rectangles are 1011, 1012 and 1013 (referenced in the
button script).
If you touch 1, 2 or 3 rectangles at the same time, the total is
displayed in the fie
Hi All
Don't use shell on windows if you don't administer the computer your using it
on. It is standard practice for system admins (particularly in an education
setting) to block the cmd prompt. That locks up your app!
So use the open process commands instead.
See:
http://goulding.ws/2010/10
Hi Mark,
I understand your point about long emails. FWIW, I try and not offer advice
on emails which I can't take time to fully read and understand.
Actually, I use a number of already compiled commercial apps which also have
to install MS's C++ libraries along with the application. This seems to
HI Roger,
Yes, I should have said, "I *ALSO* wonder if one can use Ghostscript by
itself to read a PDF? I did read your email. If I get some time later, I
might try and play around with this.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Chipp Walters wrote
Scott,
Thanks for your reply.
My mistake. It is not removed from the group. What happens is that the
dimensions of the group change when an outside control is made invisible.
My script did something line this:
--With the outside button invisible
set the visible of button "myButton" to true --
I have two object. Under some circumstances it is fine for only one of them to
be tapped but other times it is appropriate for both of them to be tapped at
the same time. I don't want to drag them anywhere just touch them.
How do I detect both touches?
Bill Vlahos
_
InfoWallet (
Jim:
Are you sure the control gets physically placed outside the group? Are you
using any scripts to manipulate object layers?
Doing a quick test here with a single object in a group, I don't see your
result (v4.6.4). The rect of a group does indeed "collapse" to encompass
only its visible conte
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Roger,
>
> Interesting. I wonder if one can use Ghostscript by itself to read a PDF?
>
>
> Chipp Walters
> CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc
>
Yes. I posted into the other thread about this topic (a cry for help),
exactly how it can be done. I
Good sleuthing Bernard! Most valuable. I suspect if this can be tested, it
would be super easy to "suck up" this exe into an app and then "spit it out" on
first run.
(see Chipp's Tips below)
http://www.altuit.com/webs/revCentral/Number6/default.htm
Chipp Walters
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc
O
Roger,
Interesting. I wonder if one can use Ghostscript by itself to read a PDF?
Chipp Walters
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc
On Oct 2, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote:
>>
Is this supposed to happen? When I set the visible of a control within a group
to false, it is removed from the group.
As a work-around I find that if I include a rectangle that physically
encompasses everything in the group and THEN set the visible of a control
within the rectangle to false,
could this Passive-agressive BS stop, now PLEASE?.
On 2 October 2011 04:40, Mark Schonewille
wrote:
> Chipp,
>
> Sorry but I don't have the time to read very long e-mails, yet I try to
> help where I can.
>
> Richard's explanation was mere speculation, even though a nice one.
>
> Graham mentions
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote:
>
> I just downloaded one of the binaries from the IM download site (the
>> zip file that is meant to require no installation/windows registry
>> atlerations). No compilation was involved.
Hi Mark,
Am 02.10.2011 um 18:25 schrieb AcidJazz:
> Is there a single line of code that will turn off all radio buttons in a
> group?
Yes :-)
Ah, the line:
...
set the hilitedbutton of grp X to 0
...
> - Mark P.
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
_
On 10/2/11 11:25 AM, AcidJazz wrote:
Is there a single line of code that will turn off all radio buttons in a
group?
set the hilitedbutton of grp "groupName" to 0
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Bernard Devlin wrote:
> I just downloaded one of the binaries from the IM download site (the
> zip file that is meant to require no installation/windows registry
> atlerations). No compilation was involved. No error messages were
> thrown up in the installation (i
On 10/1/11 7:45 AM, Olivier Dussutour wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I'm sorry to insist (needless to say I'm a beginner).
I read your answer but I wanted this script to a program that would
allow students from primary to copy files on all the computers of their
room and I found the drag and drop easier tha
Is there a single line of code that will turn off all radio buttons in a
group?
- Mark P.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Turn-off-all-Radio-Buttons-tp3865377p3865377.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 10/1/11 4:38 PM, Sivakatirswami wrote:
So I am trying to understand what "me" references.
In order for there to be a scrollbar of a group of "me" , "me" would
have to refer to a card
or "bigger" parent group, or stack.
Did I get that right?
You can think of behaviors as private backscript
I just downloaded one of the binaries from the IM download site (the
zip file that is meant to require no installation/windows registry
atlerations). No compilation was involved. No error messages were
thrown up in the installation (i.e. unzipping process). I found what
I took to be the GUI inte
Chipp,
Sorry but I don't have the time to read very long e-mails, yet I try to help
where I can.
Richard's explanation was mere speculation, even though a nice one.
Graham mentions C++ packages, which seem to be necessary for compiling.
If Graham wants to find a solution, he'll have to study m
On 30/09/2011 17:23, stephen barncard wrote:
> THis is absurd for them to expect this to take off.
>
Optimistic perhaps, absurd is too strong. It strikes me as YAOM (Yet
Another Optimistic Moonshot). If they are exactly on target they may do
very well. If they miss, even slightly, they probably g
31 matches
Mail list logo
