Here is the Ubuntu wiki page on this issue if it's of any help:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TabConsistency
It is quite dated though
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Long Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. In my opinion, recently used objects should be divided
> > into three categories: programs, documents, and locations.
>
> That's an interesting p
I run into the small issues too from time to time.
Maybe have a team of people that find these things, discuss the best
solution, then go to upstream and file bug with proposed solution?
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.or
I actually had a very big problem in Banshee. Maybe it's just me who didn't
bother to read the manual, but I thought it was a basic thing that shouldn't
require one.
Using the "open with" function on a music file with banshee would open it,
but not play the file I told it to, instead it'd play som
Hi!
I have a usability question. An application I'm on the developer team for
benefits extensively from different preferences settings, so it allows the
user to make 'profiles' and change them on-the-fly.
One issue that was raised however is that it's too tedious to go to edit ▸
preferences and c
Could anyone offer any input on this?
Thank you!
On 3/12/09, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have a usability question. An application I'm on the developer team for
> benefits extensively from different preferences settings, so it allows the
> user to make 'prof
Ah sorry, I was suggested to show a live example
The program is this: http://shutter-project.org/ and is already available
for download.
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
hots options - sometimes its needed in order to be able to setup a
menu before the screenshot is taken.
>
>
> Vadim Peretokin a écrit :
>
>> Ah sorry, I was suggested to show a live example
>>
>> The program is this: http://shutter-project.org
;t capture the mouse, etc) - but they
wouldn't need this when taking a screenshot of their desktop for a friend.
So they could have a "documentation" and a "usual" profile.
Hope that explains it okay
>
>
> Kirk
>
>
>
>
>
> Vadim Peretokin wrote:
Ah. That solves it then, thanks ;)
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
We don't think that this of such great importance to be in the toolbar,
which we try to keep only for the essential functions (such as ways of
taking a screenshot + upload button + edit button, and that's it)
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
Just to note, I dislike Epiphany's removal of File -> Quit. They didn't seem
to think through the case where one would want to close the browser, and the
open it again, with the same tabs open - which current file->quit
accomplishes.
___
Usability mailing
The point of shutting down was to save resources / have the content still
open after a restart.
Thanks for the extension, but isn't it puzzling that this sub-basic
functionality is considered unnecessary?
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
ht
I'd second the survey via Google Docs idea. It works out nice.
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
What about those you are on/off? Maybe you should add "in total".
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
Sorry... what happened to under 18 people?
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
And people being forced to use windows in the work enviroment, but gnome
being just good enough?
(sorry... if it's too late to raise this, then it's fine)
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
What do you use to *opeare* the devices inside Gnome?
Typo
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
Seems the "How do you think Gnome may be improved in the next major
version?" column is too small and you can't resize it to be bigger.
A sticking point is Compiz integration. Gnome seems to be doing their best
to ignore it (esp. with the conflicts raised in gnome shell), but the
question response
Just being signed in with a google account worked for me
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
Frankly, I've yet to see a single yet besides you who makes such a big fuss
over their panel.
Your behavior about this is more horrifying than the error that barely
anyone notices.
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mail
The ComboBoxEntry seems to just work well for pre-defined values, that's why
Epiphany is using them for fonts. I'd say a slider is more applicable in the
general case...
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
Glade 3?
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
It's all about developers. Those that care ask for feedback and
listenhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/docky-design-feedback-wanted.html
(Ubuntu forums does have a section for this in development
*Ubuntu Dev Link Forum
* This forum allows developers to ask questions and
have the user base reply.
Try reading what people actually write:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity
in it recently. *We were wondering is this still an issue for you?* Can you
try with latest Ubuntu releas
They asked if it's relevant to you, if you read it. If it's not relevant,
then no, you don't have to download a 5 year old OS to test it - you'd be
affected by it right now.
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list
26 matches
Mail list logo
