Could anyone give me some advice on bug 149323 (HIG issues with Theme
Preferences). The issue is that the theme manager often takes longer
than one second to apply a theme, so therefore it should not be instant
apply. Would it be acceptable to most people to change the theme manager
to explici
Kirk Bridger wrote:
Thomas Wood wrote:
Could anyone give me some advice on bug 149323 (HIG issues with Theme
Preferences). The issue is that the theme manager often takes longer
than one second to apply a theme, so therefore it should not be
instant apply. Would it be acceptable to most
I have a few bug reports I'm not sure how to resolve:
Bug 331835 [1] - Missing maximize button (in Theme Preferences)
Bug 330303 [2] - theme-manager "theme details" window should be transient...
Any advice from a usability point of view on the above
bugs would be much appreciated!
-Thomas
[1
Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a few bug reports I'm not sure how to
resolve:
Bug 331835 [1] - Missing maximize button (in Theme
Preferences)
I think what the reporter really wants is a 'smart
resize' button like Mac
Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 11:51 +0100, Thomas Wood
wrote:
So definitely should be fixed? I could never see
any use case for having
the capplet open multiple times, so if it gets the
approval of the
usability team, then
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
[...]
Having said all that, I don't understand why the Theme Preferences
window is not a dialog and is resizable, but doesn't become
maximizable automatically. That looks like too much flexibility in
Metacity.
I think the problem here is the theme preferences is a di
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 3:29 AM, Sven Jaborek wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 30.04.2006, 15:42 +0100 schrieb Thomas Wood:
Could anyone give me some advice on bug 149323 (HIG issues with Theme
Preferences). The issue is that the theme manager often takes longer
than one second
I'm currently working on a colour schemes tab for gnome-theme-manager. I
have attached a screenshot of the current UI (note this is not in CVS
yet). I would be glad of any usability and accessibility comments,
particularly in relation to HIG compliance.
-Thomas
___
Sven Herzberg wrote:
> On So, 2006-10-29 at 19:02 +0000, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> I'm currently working on a colour schemes tab for gnome-theme-manager. I
>> have attached a screenshot of the current UI (note this is not in CVS
>> yet). I would be glad of any usability
Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
[..]
>
> When work on gtk named colors was done first, it was supposed that there
> will be color schemes that will define complete look of desktop
> widgets.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/SymbolicThemableColors
>
> It's usually very hard to select consistent color
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
[...]
>> We can simply take the tick back with the new color. I agree that
>> people may confusing between cross and ticks.
>
> Great!
Just a heads up to say the change has been made in the 2.9.4 release of
gtk-engines to revert the checkbox mark from crosses to ticks.
I'm currently looking at integrating the various appearance settings
throughout GNOME into a single "Appearance Settings" application for the
control center.
I have made some mockups, which can be seen here:
http://live.gnome.org/ControlCenter/AppearanceSettings
We've discussed these on the co
On 04/16/2007 09:57 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:57 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> I'm currently looking at integrating the various appearance settings
>> throughout GNOME into a single "Appearance Settings" application
On 04/16/2007 04:31 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:57 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> I am not sure
>> if the advice in the HIG applies to this, as it is (or should be) fairly
>> obvious that changing to a different theme will affect options not show
On 04/16/2007 03:56 PM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:57:31PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> http://live.gnome.org/ControlCenter/AppearanceSettings
>
> Theme selection doesn't affect Fonts, Desktop and Options, right?
> There should be some sep
On 18/04/07 18:47, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 16:23 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> Either that, or including the remaining options in the theme. For those
>> on the "Options" tab it might make sense as some themes might want to
>> specify
On 19/04/07 13:57, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 19:21 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> Maybe we get some of these things with the new Xrandr? I haven't been
>> following it too closely. The problem I can see here though, is that
>> Display may not be
Firstly, apologies for the dely in replying. I often miss e-mails if I
am not explicitly included in the recipient list!
On 18/04/07 17:53, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
[...]
>
> I also think people will change their background picture far more often
> than they change anything else in the window
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:25:13 -0400
Caleb Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It seems that the default tooltip delay in GNOME is 0, meaning that
> tooltips show up as soon as a button or menu item is highlighted. I
> find this really annoying, a
On 31 Oct 2007, at 13:54, Denis Washington wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:44 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 19:20 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
>>> Le samedi 13 octobre 2007, à 14:25 +0200, Francesco Fumanti a écrit :
Hello,
[...]
I have made a mockup that integra
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:35 +, Charline wrote:
> > I would appreciate it if everybody who is planning on attending the
> > GNOME 3 Usability Hackfest could speak up and share their ideas of
> what
> > we should focus on while together, and what things each person plans
> to
> > bring to the eve
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 14:38 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Can you clarify what you mean by 'usability assessment'? Are you
> referring to heuristic analysis or to actual user testing?
I guess I was really just hoping for a useful feedback and prototyping
session, so we can uncover any weakness in the
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 14:36 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> > A possibility for one of these meals would be to meet up with other
> > GNOME folk who are in London. Perhaps we could tie in with a GNOME
> > London Beer [2] event?
>
> I like the sound of that :)
I can definitely arrange that too!
Reg
Hi Folks,
The accessibility folks are over in London town for a usability hackfest
next week, so we thought it would be nice to have a meet-up event to
coincide.
The normal wiki page is up and available for you to let us know if
you're coming:
http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.10
If th
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 14:21 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/London2010
>
> http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/London2010/GoalsAndAgenda
>
> What time of day does the hackfest start? I can't seem to find this
> rather vital piece of information on a
Unfortunately the usual Pizza Express was full, but there is an even
closer Pizza Express round the corner so we have a table booked for 8:15
at:
7/9 St Bride Street, London EC4A 4AS
We'll still all meet in the Olde Cheshire Cheese at 7pm and head on over
about an hour later, but if anyone is n
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:20 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> On mié, 2010-03-03 at 00:03 +0100, Filippo Argiolas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Filippo Argiolas
> > wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> > > Well it's not actually the radio functionality that I really care,
> > > that
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 14:49 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi :),
>
> On mié, 2010-03-03 at 11:45 +0000, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:20 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> > > Hi!,
> > >
> > > On mié, 2010-03-03 at 00:03 +0100, Filippo A
28 matches
Mail list logo
