On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:32:47PM +0200, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> You should probably record to /tmp first and move the file to the
> desktop when recording is done, so that the thumbnailer doesn't run all
> the time and sucks up cpu. (This is a nautilus or whatever bug imho).
This has been fixed
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:21:16PM +0200, Estradin Solaris wrote:
> I have been reading the 3.0 roadmap for Gnome, and I found it quite
> worrying. Essentially it talks about a radical departure from the
> desktop metaphor. I don't feel that is quite right. [1]
That is not an official list. There
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Antti Aspinen wrote:
> Talking about the dialogs in gnome. I think that gnome got some really
> stypid gui design things, but it's got also some fast manuvers. It doesn't
> not look pretty, but it sure does is simple to understand and get started
> with it.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:43:08PM +0200, Antti Aspinen wrote:
> I apologize for calling it that. But nautilus is worst program in gnome.
> It's like explorer prosess is in windows. crashes often and it's got
> configuration problems. You cannot deny that simple fact. I remember that
My crasher wa
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:43:21PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my name is Andreas Tille. I'm a Linux user for more than 10 years and Debian
> Developer since 1998. My only reason for using a more complex GUI than
> fvwm,
> ion or something like that is that I can't attract my family to
Reference http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323586
Closing a gnome-terminal window with multiple tabs will display an alert
dialog with 2 buttons, 'Cancel' and 'Close All Tabs'. The default
button is the 'Close All Tabs'. Pressing tab will switch the focus to
the alert text. In bug 323586
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:37:53PM +0100, Kovacs Baldvin wrote:
[..]
> And one other thing: maybe cli is bad, but if everybody would
> know a bit of the cli, I could easily say: give it a -R, and
> that's gonna make it recursive. Now that we think of cli as
> the worst evil on earth, now the only t
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:32:16PM +0100, Tomasz Janowitz wrote:
> I have a question regarding gnome-terminal shortcuts, namely: what are the
> 'shift's standing for ? Wouldn't it be easier to have them as in other apps
> ? 'ctrl+t' - new tab, 'ctrl+q' - quit terminal. Is this because of lack of
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:15:37PM +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:32:16PM +0100, Tomasz
> > Janowitz wrote:
> > > I have a question regarding gnome-terminal shortcuts, namely: what
>
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 10:51:39PM +0100, Armand CORBEAUX wrote:
> Hello with all, I am new in the project of utilisability of GNOME.
> First thing to be made: to explain which I am.
I'm totally not following you. Long post, not much content. Don't even
see suggestions in there other than some ge
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Antti Aspinen wrote:
> I am pretty sure most people consider you as troll but if it has
> anymeaning I think I understand what you are trying to say.
Just wanted to say I consider neither Armand nor you a troll.
> Gnome has good application base which is
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:38:45PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> The problem is, all the theme manager does is set a few gconf keys. It
> has no way of knowing when the settings have been applied, or even if
> they succeeded. I doubt that there is much we can do to speed up the
> process either.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:18:27PM +0100, Piotr Zaryk wrote:
> There have been complaints that Nautilus is very slow especially when
> opening folders that contain many files and folders. Lots of votes on the
> brainstorm confirms that users want to have faster Nautilus. I think that it
> should be
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:27:26PM +1930, Dokuro wrote:
> http://glade.gnome.org/manual/getting-started.html
Glade audience is developers, who can be expected to have access to
bigger screens. For documentation purposes the screenshot is also very
small.
HIG is just a guideline. If you need to de
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:14:56AM +0200, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
> I'm just astonished that not a single developer has taken the time to
> ask this question, so please don't consider this crossposting. No one
> replied there and after a reasonable amount of time, I'm bringing the
> question over he
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:38:29PM +0200, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Olav. Please find below mines.
>
> 2008/8/8 Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:14:56AM +0200, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
> >> I'm just astonis
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:03:48PM +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> Due to the high amount of spam currently bombarding the usability
> moderation queue (~1000/day), I have temporarily set mailman to discard
> all messages to usability@gnome.org that have been held for moderation
> for more than tw
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:43:20PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> Mostly bounces, mostly from postermaster and mailer-daemon
That should be severely limited as of ~12.00 UTC Sep 24. There is still
some bounces coming through (qmail mostly), but hopefully most of the
flood should have stopped.
--
Re
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:48:36AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> I totally regret that I never had the time or patience to learn how to
> program properly, but I hereby volunteer to do any graphics design
> needed (icons/website/whatever) for such a app.
To each his own IMO, I am very happy
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:02:26PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
> first time.. look here for the full discussion (about 150 posts):
> http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=65669&viewmode=flat&order=ASC&start=0
[..]
>
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:02:26PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> >> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
> >> first time.. look h
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:13:00PM +, Calum Benson wrote:
> AFAIK "you" weren't put on moderation-- mailman has queued a number of
> emails in this thread, which I've only just cleared. (I suspect most of
> the moderators, including myself, are on vacation this week, so
> apologies in adv
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:24:36PM +, Allan Day wrote:
> Eek! Never noticed that before! Agreed - most uncomfortable. Right mouse
> button should == context menu. Nothing else.
Disagree. If it isn't used, then I don't see the problem of having it
work the same as the other button. Actually nic
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:31:34PM +, Calum Benson wrote:
> Hmm. Do you expect a file in nautilus to be selected when you
> right-click? Because that's what's happens (and that behaviour is the
> same on most other platforms I can think of)...
I mean: if there is no point for the right mouse
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:46:12AM -0700, Jim March wrote:
> To ignore this bug for 3+ years means that at a fundamental level,
> Gnome doesn't care about that.
Please don't forget about:
http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
- "Assume people mean well"
I know the author who currently maintains gn
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:27:02AM +, kerbe...@piestar.net wrote:
> Firstly, I think bugzilla has no place in any discussions of
> usability. Bugs are absolute, and bug tracking software is designed
Of course.
> Secondly, and ironically, there is no greater divide in the software
> community
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:48:04AM +, kerbe...@piestar.net wrote:
> Quoting Olav Vitters :
>
> >>but few can contribute code - which seems to be the sole focus.
> >
> >In case you're not aware: Yes, it is a meritocracy. Don't see how this
> >is a so
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:24:14PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> Now you've really done it, you've got me mad!
Please do NOT respond to this thread.
Your friendly mailing list moderator.
Mark: You will receive a private email shortly.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
Us
Is there still time to discuss the need for the Interface tab? It will
be gone in 2.30.
Of course, it can be changed with gconf-editor, but I don't consider
that to be a good solution.
Is it is usability issue to have that tab?
Note: attached message is a bit emotional, please ignore those bits
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:17:57AM -0600, Ted Pomeroy wrote:
> Dear Gnome, I have seen the fork request by Linus Torvalds and I
> agree. I am a happy user of Gnome 2.30.2 and wonder why the
Linus did not make any fork request. He only indicated he was unhappy.
Some blogs tried to get a lot of hits
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:06:31PM -0800, Teunis Peters wrote:
> I haven't figured out how to test this on my primary environment
> (netbook) as all I have access to is unity and it's effectively
> unusable (and causes crashes). So I'm asking from the perspective of
> trying to figure out where t
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:49:28AM -0800, juan smith wrote:
> I clicked this link in Wikipedia, hoping to find a list of Internet Service
> Providers with their APN`s.
> http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/MobileBroadband/ServiceProviders
>
> All I got to was a huge page detailing how I could co
removed and banned from mailing list
--
Regards,
Olav (moderator)
___
usability mailing list
usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:12:10AM +0100, Paweł Kubik wrote:
> I have joined this mailing list because I am very impressed with new Gnome
> interface. He's smart and innovative but also annoying at some points. I'd
> like to share my ideas and leave some feedback.
> I know it's quite obvious.
Hell
34 matches
Mail list logo
